58-60 Headlamps - NCRS Discussion Boards

58-60 Headlamps

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mark P.
    Very Frequent User
    • May 13, 2008
    • 934

    58-60 Headlamps

    If I locate T-3 bulbs with 3 prongs (Low/high) and 2 prongs (high) with a clear T-3 triangle (no pepple grain) and the word GUIDE below the T-3 triangle near the bottom edge of the bulb, will they judge correctly ? I will make sure they are not the repro bulbs with the DOT on the face.
  • Jim D.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • June 30, 1985
    • 2882

    #2
    Re: 58-60 Headlamps

    I believe the triangle should have the pebble grain and the "Guide" along the bottom to be correct for a 1960. 58 & 59 were the same except the Guide" was above the triangle.

    Jim

    Comment

    • Mark P.
      Very Frequent User
      • May 13, 2008
      • 934

      #3
      Re: 58-60 Headlamps

      I read quite a few threads that the pepple grain may actually be the same as clear. Has anyone ever received a deduction for a 58-60 T-3 with a clear triangle and Guide below it ?

      Comment

      • Jeffrey S.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • May 31, 1988
        • 1879

        #4
        Re: 58-60 Headlamps

        1958-'59 T-3's had a clear triangle with the word "Guide" embossed (raised) on top of the triangle. 1960 to '67 had a clear triangle with the "Guide" at the bottom. I'm not sure of the exact deduction but there would be one for a '58-'59 with the Guide at the bottom.
        Jeff

        Comment

        • Jim D.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • June 30, 1985
          • 2882

          #5
          Re: 58-60 Headlamps

          Jeffrey,

          Everything you posted is in direct conflict of what is printed in the 4th edition of the 58-60 Tech. Info. Manual & Judging Guide.

          Jim

          P.S. The originals in my 1960 have the pebble-grain triangles as per the above reference manual.
          Last edited by Jim D.; October 7, 2008, 07:06 PM.

          Comment

          • Mark P.
            Very Frequent User
            • May 13, 2008
            • 934

            #6
            Re: 58-60 Headlamps

            Here is how I wanted my question to read:

            "I read quite a few threads that the pepple grain may actually be the same as clear. Has anyone ever received a deduction for a 1960 T-3 with a clear triangle and GUIDE below it ?"

            When I look for T-3's they seem to all fall into these 3 categories:

            1. GUIDE above the T-3 logo - 1958-1959 per the JM
            2. GUIDE below the T-3 logo with a T-3 logo that does not have any vertical lines and appears clear - 1960 per the JM
            3. GUIDE below T-3 logo with a T03 logo that has vertical lines - later model per JM

            Comment

            • Jack H.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • March 31, 1990
              • 9906

              #7
              Re: 58-60 Headlamps

              The 'pebble grain' structure of the glass within the T3 triangle of '58 & later Guide quad beam lamps is a long time, well known, descriptive error. The dual beam lamps from '56-57 had this aspect of cosmetics but the quad beam lamps didn't (T3 triangle is clear).

              The change in relocating the 'Guide' emboss (early lamps have it over the T3 triangle) to the bottom of the lamp isn't locked in concrete as to change over date. Some 'untouched' original 1960 Corvettes built as late as Nov/Dec have been seen with the early version of T3 lamp and there have been '60 cars with mix and match components of early & late T3 quad beams on them...

              Comment

              • Jeffrey S.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • May 31, 1988
                • 1879

                #8
                Re: 58-60 Headlamps

                Jim:
                As Jack stated above, there may have been some very early '60's that had the '58-'59 style T-3's but other than that I think my descripton is correct. The pebble grain triangle was evident in the '56-'57 Corvette and other GM cars using the single large headlamp but the triangle of all quad system T-3's from '58 to '67 were clear. I am not familiar with what the early judging guide states. I'm sure others will chime in.
                Jeff

                Comment

                • Jeffrey S.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • May 31, 1988
                  • 1879

                  #9
                  Re: 58-60 Headlamps

                  Jim:
                  The triangle in your bulbs may appear to have a pebble grain but may just not be crystal clear with some waviness in the glass which is common or it may be some "road rash" (from gravel, stones, etc). After all we are not dealing with Baccarrat crystal here.
                  Jeff

                  Comment

                  • Jim D.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • June 30, 1985
                    • 2882

                    #10
                    Re: 58-60 Headlamps

                    Okay, I had to go up to my shop to take a look. My triangles are indeed clear. My mistake. Note to self, don't trust your memory once you hit 50. Sorry for the confusion.

                    The Judging Manual calls for the pebble grain vs. verticle ribs. No mention of clear triangles.

                    Jim
                    Last edited by Jim D.; October 7, 2008, 11:17 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Jack H.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • March 31, 1990
                      • 9906

                      #11
                      Re: 58-60 Headlamps

                      "The Judging Manual calls for the pebble grain vs. verticle ribs."

                      Yes it does, but that's the reason the book's title was INTENTIONALLY changed from 'Judging Manual' to 'Judging Guide' several years ago. The name change reflects the fact that there will be errors of omission/errors of commission in the book and that it's intended as a supplement to the judge's personal knowledge.

                      Bottom line, don't believe everything you read that's in print!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      Searching...Please wait.
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                      There are no results that meet this criteria.
                      Search Result for "|||"