62 water pump pulley - NCRS Discussion Boards

62 water pump pulley

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John F.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • March 23, 2008
    • 2395

    62 water pump pulley

    Just installed a 609 water pump and went to put the pulley back on and it hits the crank pulley. What diameter should the pulley be? I didn't see a number on the old one. They appear to line up ok, but touch. Need advise or suggestions.
  • Larry C.
    Very Frequent User
    • March 31, 1980
    • 279

    #2
    Re: 62 water pump pulley

    John,

    My original '62 340 hp has water pump pulley #3724816 GM stamped on the outside under the area that is covered with the fan installed. It is approx. 7 1/16 " in dia. and 2" deep from outside front edge to back of pulley edge.

    Also, there is a spacer that fits between the inside of pulley and the water pump flange. Spacer is a circle with curved edges that sort of wraps around the water pump flange with four corresponding holes like the flange. Space is somewhere between 1/16" and 1/8" in thickness.

    Hope this helps. Larry

    Comment

    • John F.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • March 23, 2008
      • 2395

      #3
      Re: 62 water pump pulley

      Mine is just a 250 hp. I may have to try again tomorrow and see what fits.

      Comment

      • Mike E.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • February 28, 1975
        • 5132

        #4
        Re: 62 water pump pulley

        John--
        Check the AIM and the judging manual. 250 hp and 340 hp are the same.

        Comment

        • Joe L.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • January 31, 1988
          • 43191

          #5
          Re: 62 water pump pulley

          Originally posted by John Ftacek (48800)
          Mine is just a 250 hp. I may have to try again tomorrow and see what fits.

          John-----


          1962 250 hp used pulley GM #3724816, although some later cars may have used pulley GM #3770245. Both are about the same OD, though. You should also have crank pulley GM #3756328. This pulley is 6-3/4" OD.
          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

          Comment

          • Terry R.
            Expired
            • February 28, 2005
            • 359

            #6
            Re: 62 water pump pulley

            John The flange may have been pressed a little too far when the pump was rebuilt.

            Comment

            • Mike E.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • February 28, 1975
              • 5132

              #7
              Re: 62 water pump pulley

              Joe--
              Contrary to GM documents,I've never found (in 34 years of studying them) anything but the 816 pulley on a 62--and have documented original-owner, high horsepower (and low horse) cars up to the 14,000 VIN range. I'm convinced they never used an idler pulley and never used a dual-groove pulley on a factory-built 62.

              Comment

              • John F.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • March 23, 2008
                • 2395

                #8
                Re: 62 water pump pulley

                Terry, I don't think the flange is the problem. They seem to line up ok (the valleys in the pulley and crankshaft pulley. It's the the two pullies that appear to be touching (lip-to-lip)?? I didn't get a chance to work on it today.

                Comment

                • Joe L.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • January 31, 1988
                  • 43191

                  #9
                  Re: 62 water pump pulley

                  Originally posted by John Ftacek (48800)
                  Terry, I don't think the flange is the problem. They seem to line up ok (the valleys in the pulley and crankshaft pulley. It's the the two pullies that appear to be touching (lip-to-lip)?? I didn't get a chance to work on it today.
                  John-----


                  Do you have the waterpump pulley actually bolted to the waterpump flange or is it just being supported by the pilot shaft? If it's the latter, it may "tip" enough to contact the crank pulley. When it's bolted up, though, this will correct itself.

                  If you have the correct crank and waterpump pullies, I don't see how you could end up with contact between them. Even if the engine had been excessively line-bored (unlikely), I still don't think it would change things enough to cause pulley contact.
                  In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                  Comment

                  • Terry R.
                    Expired
                    • February 28, 2005
                    • 359

                    #10
                    Re: 62 water pump pulley

                    Originally posted by John Ftacek (48800)
                    Terry, I don't think the flange is the problem. They seem to line up ok (the valleys in the pulley and crankshaft pulley. It's the the two pullies that appear to be touching (lip-to-lip)?? I didn't get a chance to work on it today.
                    John I reread your post. I missread it I thought that the pully was hitting the pump. If it cleared with those pullys before i'm at a loss.

                    Comment

                    • John F.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • March 23, 2008
                      • 2395

                      #11
                      Re: 62 water pump pulley

                      The pump is bolted and torqued to the block. Since I never took the shroud off when I removed, I took the fan blade off of the flange then the pulley, then the the pump. I am re-assembling in the same manner. Maybe I should have the whole assembly bolted together before placing over the pilot bolts and bolting to the block. Anybodys thoughts?

                      Comment

                      • Joe L.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • January 31, 1988
                        • 43191

                        #12
                        Re: 62 water pump pulley

                        Originally posted by John Ftacek (48800)
                        The pump is bolted and torqued to the block. Since I never took the shroud off when I removed, I took the fan blade off of the flange then the pulley, then the the pump. I am re-assembling in the same manner. Maybe I should have the whole assembly bolted together before placing over the pilot bolts and bolting to the block. Anybodys thoughts?
                        John----


                        I don't see how the order of assembly should affect the final clearance between the pullies. The order of assembly might be important for ease of assembly but it should not affect issue under discussion here.

                        The distance between the waterpump shaft centerline and the centerline of the crankshaft is fixed and constant. It can only change SLIGHTLY due to line boring of the crankshaft bearing journals and, as I've previously mentioned, even if this occurred, I can't see enough resultant reduction in clearance to cause pulley contact.

                        Also, it should not matter what waterpump casting you use. All small block waterpump castings will produce an identical shaft centerline position relative to the block. Even considering manufacturing tolerances, I cannot see enough difference to cause the problem you describe.
                        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                        Comment

                        • John F.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • March 23, 2008
                          • 2395

                          #13
                          Re: 62 water pump pulley

                          As best as I can measure, the crank pulley is 6 3/4 and the pump pulley is

                          7 1/8". Do I need to get a new pump pulley?

                          Comment

                          • Joe L.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • January 31, 1988
                            • 43191

                            #14
                            Re: 62 water pump pulley

                            Originally posted by John Ftacek (48800)
                            As best as I can measure, the crank pulley is 6 3/4 and the pump pulley is

                            7 1/8". Do I need to get a new pump pulley?
                            John----


                            Your pulley dimensions sound correct to me. The waterpump shaft centerline-to-crank centerline dimension on a small block is 7.1". The radius of your waterpump pulley is 3.56"; the radius of your crank pulley is 3.375". The total of this is 6.935". So, there should be 0.165" clearance between the 2 pullies, as installed. Certainly, that's not a lot of clearance, but it should be sufficient.
                            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                            Comment

                            • Christopher R.
                              Extremely Frequent Poster
                              • March 31, 1975
                              • 1599

                              #15
                              Re: 62 water pump pulley

                              When finally installed, the two pullies will be very close to each other. But they shouldn't touch. Before they are bolted up, it may seem that they will touch because the clearance is so small. If one of the pullies is misaligned, because it is not fully seated, they will touch. But after you get both of them bolted up, you should be OK.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"