C2 Oil pan question - NCRS Discussion Boards

C2 Oil pan question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brian K.
    Expired
    • May 31, 2004
    • 358

    C2 Oil pan question

    Hi, my question is for how many years is the standard 327ci 5 quart oil pan the same? In other words 1963 to 19?? are the same. Thanks sincerely Brian
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43218

    #2
    Re: C2 Oil pan question

    Originally posted by Brian Kotula (42040)
    Hi, my question is for how many years is the standard 327ci 5 quart oil pan the same? In other words 1963 to 19?? are the same. Thanks sincerely Brian

    Brian-----


    The standard capacity small block oil pan, GM #3820000, was used from 1963 through 1974.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Stuart F.
      Expired
      • August 31, 1996
      • 4676

      #3
      Re: C2 Oil pan question

      Brian and Joe;

      Can you clear something up for me; I always thought of the 5 quart pan as the one for the SHP engines, total oil refill of 6 quarts with filter. And, I thought of the standard as the 4 quart pan, total oil refill of 5 quarts with filter. Is the pan capacity actually 6 quarts (SHP) and 5 quarts (std), disregarding the filter??

      Thanks;

      Stu Fox

      Comment

      • John H.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • December 1, 1997
        • 16513

        #4
        Re: C2 Oil pan question

        Originally posted by Stuart Fox (28060)
        Brian and Joe;

        Can you clear something up for me; I always thought of the 5 quart pan as the one for the SHP engines, total oil refill of 6 quarts with filter. And, I thought of the standard as the 4 quart pan, total oil refill of 5 quarts with filter. Is the pan capacity actually 6 quarts (SHP) and 5 quarts (std), disregarding the filter??

        Thanks;

        Stu Fox
        Stu -

        Nope, you have it right. The SHP pan holds 5 quarts (for a 6-quart system), and the standard pan holds 4 quarts (for a 5-quart system).

        Comment

        • Rick A.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • July 31, 2002
          • 2147

          #5
          Re: C2 Oil pan question

          so, Brian was not asking about the "Standard" oil pan he was asking about the oil pan for the SHP
          Rick Aleshire
          2016 Ebony C7R Z06 "ROSA"

          Comment

          • Duke W.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • January 1, 1993
            • 15667

            #6
            Re: C2 Oil pan question

            Originally posted by Stuart Fox (28060)
            Brian and Joe;

            Can you clear something up for me; I always thought of the 5 quart pan as the one for the SHP engines, total oil refill of 6 quarts with filter. And, I thought of the standard as the 4 quart pan, total oil refill of 5 quarts with filter. Is the pan capacity actually 6 quarts (SHP) and 5 quarts (std), disregarding the filter??

            Thanks;

            Stu Fox
            Different people use different conventions. Mine for C2 is as follows:

            Mechanical lifter SB: 5-quart pan, 6-quart system
            Hydraulic lifter SB: 4-quart pan, 5-quart system

            (One exception may be early '65 L-79s that may have had the "big pan" before the power steering option was added as a running change early in the model year, but I've never fully resolved whether this is true or note.)

            The extra quart to achieve "system capacity" is the oil filter, and the actual "pan capacities" are as stated.

            I think the above can also apply to C3s as I recall the only C3 SB to get a 5-quart pan was the LT-1.
            Last edited by Duke W.; August 26, 2008, 06:17 PM.

            Comment

            • Brian K.
              Expired
              • May 31, 2004
              • 358

              #7
              Re: C2 Oil pan question

              Sorry Rick and Stu, I ment 5 quart system 4 quart pan. Thanks for the answer Joe I think your my guardian angel!!!

              Comment

              • Stuart F.
                Expired
                • August 31, 1996
                • 4676

                #8
                Re: C2 Oil pan question

                Brian;

                I wasn't trying to be a smart butt, I was seriously curious because I have seen in threads where these have been referred to as the 5 quart pan (when they probably meant the pan used with the 5 quart system) and the 6 quart pan (when again they probably meant the pan used with the 6 quart system). It got to where I was thinking I just wasn't "HIP". I only learned a while back what they meant by "BTW"!

                Stu Fox

                Comment

                • Brian K.
                  Expired
                  • May 31, 2004
                  • 358

                  #9
                  Re: C2 Oil pan question

                  Hi Stu, I didn't think you were being smart butt at all. I was just sorry for putting up a somewhat confusing question, I'm a newbi at this Corvette stuff but ask me about 67 Camaro's and I can hold my own!

                  Comment

                  • Joe L.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • February 1, 1988
                    • 43218

                    #10
                    Re: C2 Oil pan question

                    [quote=Stuart Fox (28060);365093]Brian;

                    I wasn't trying to be a smart butt, I was seriously curious because I have seen in threads where these have been referred to as the 5 quart pan (when they probably meant the pan used with the 5 quart system) and the 6 quart pan (when again they probably meant the pan used with the 6 quart system). It t[quote]



                    Stu-----


                    I don't like using a "capacity" to describe an oil pan. Here's why: the actual volumetric capacity of a "5 quart" or "6 quart" oil pan is WAY more than either of those figures-----it's probably at least twice that much. It's only at a CERTAIN FILL LEVEL that those capacities apply. That fill level is nowhere near the actual volumetric capacity of the pan. So, when I refer to a "5 quart" or "6 quart" pan, I am referring to SYSTEM CAPACITY.
                    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                    Comment

                    • Terry M.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • September 30, 1980
                      • 15599

                      #11
                      Re: C2 Oil pan question

                      Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
                      Different people use different conventions. Mine for C2 is as follows:

                      Mechanical lifter SB: 5-quart pan, 6-quart system
                      Hydraulic lifter SB: 4-quart pan, 5-quart system

                      I think the above can also apply to C3s as I recall the only C3 SB to get a 5-quart pan was the LT-1.
                      SOME LT-!s and leave it at that because it is way too confusing for this thread.
                      Terry

                      Comment

                      • Duke W.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • January 1, 1993
                        • 15667

                        #12
                        Re: C2 Oil pan question

                        I should know better than to start talking about C3s.

                        Duke

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        Searching...Please wait.
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                        Search Result for "|||"