Th-200 R4 - NCRS Discussion Boards

Th-200 R4

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul J.
    Expired
    • June 30, 1999
    • 83

    Th-200 R4

    We decided we are going to install a stock Th-200 R4 transmission into our 1961 Corvette with the stock 283 engine. Can anyone point me to any technical threads or readings on the conversion? I know the TV cable is very important, and We have selected a TV cable for an Edelbrock 4 barrel. There doesn't appear to be one available for the stock Carter carburetor.

    Paul
    Parker, CO
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • December 31, 1992
    • 15627

    #2
    Re: Th-200 R4

    Originally posted by Paul Jarrett (32495)
    We decided we are going to install a stock Th-200 R4 transmission into our 1961 Corvette with the stock 283 engine. Can anyone point me to any technical threads or readings on the conversion? I know the TV cable is very important, and We have selected a TV cable for an Edelbrock 4 barrel. There doesn't appear to be one available for the stock Carter carburetor.

    Paul
    Parker, CO
    There were five "stock 283" configurations in 1961, so I hope you are talking about one of the three that doesn't have a Duntov cam.

    Duke

    Comment

    • Paul J.
      Expired
      • June 30, 1999
      • 83

      #3
      Re: Th-200 R4

      We have a 3:55 rear end.

      Comment

      • Terry D.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • May 31, 1987
        • 2690

        #4
        Re: Th-200 R4

        Duke
        Could you expand on your statement about not having a Duntov came with the automatic in a 61?

        Terry

        Comment

        • Duke W.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • December 31, 1992
          • 15627

          #5
          Re: Th-200 R4

          High overlap cams yield a rough idle and need much higher idle speed than the base engine cam, and the effect of a given high overlap is exacerbated by shorter strokes, so a high overlap cam like the Duntov is not at all friendly to automatic transmissions, especially in a 283. That's why GM never offered Powerglide on OE Duntov-cam engines.

          Notwithstanding the handfull of L-88/TH400 combinations, which were meant for serious drag racing, the first time GM offered an auto trans with a SHP engine was the L-82/TH400 and the L-82 cam has less overlap than the Duntov, so GM was able to engineer an acceptable auto trans configuration on the longer stroke 350 with a "moderate overlap" cam for retail sale to the general public.

          Well engineered combinations of high overlap cams and automatics incorporate "high stall" converters - typically 3000-3500 RPM versus the typical 1800-2000 on OE engines with low overlap cams. This can make for a good drag racing combination, but it will have really atrocious fuel economy in normal road driving, which is something to consider at today's fuel prices.

          A few years ago I helped out an owner of a '62 with overheating and idle stability problems. It turned out the cam was a 30-30 with a 700R4. Some spark advance map modifications helped (It had a "B1" VAC and I replaced it with a "B28), but it was still a cantakerous beast in normal driving and the owner eventually followed my advice and installed a base engine cam, which made it a much more pleasant cruiser, which was his primary use.

          Duke
          Last edited by Duke W.; July 20, 2008, 11:22 AM.

          Comment

          • Paul J.
            Expired
            • June 30, 1999
            • 83

            #6
            Re: Th-200 R4

            I don't believe the new cam is to the spec of a Duntov cam. At least I never selected anything like that.

            I am researching the Tru-Shift solution for my project from Bowletransmissions.com. They claim that it is the simplest setup you can purchase and requires no pressure testing when installing. I have not found a solution for my stock Carter carb, it appears I need to install a Edelbrock or Holley.

            Can someone tell me if you need to change the whole stock 'rod' throddle mechanism? It appears that the TV set-up that I read from Bowtie Overdrives uses a cable system from the pedal to the carb, and from the carb to the tranny. Is there any connection from the TV cable the the shift linkage on the TH-200 RV?

            Paul

            Comment

            • Michael S.
              Expired
              • March 31, 1987
              • 364

              #7
              Re: Th-200 R4

              Originally posted by Paul Jarrett (32495)
              Is there any connection from the TV cable the the shift linkage on the TH-200 RV?

              Paul
              Makes no sense?

              Call a company called Lokar out of Knoxville Tennessee. They make aftermarket throttle cables for all sorts of applications including old Corvettes that are modified with new engines or transmissions. They will have something that works with your gas pedal.

              Talk with Bowler Transmissions as they have a new bolt on system for carbs that allows the installation of a throttle cable and TV cable to several different types of carbs. You will need to call Bowler and talk to them not look on their website. Bowler definetly has a carburetor throttle cable/TV cable adapter for the Carter type of carb as produced by Edelbrock. Depending on the configuration of the butterfly arm where your current rod attaches, their kit may also fit an early Carter 4 jet.

              Comment

              • John H.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • November 30, 1997
                • 16513

                #8
                Re: Th-200 R4

                If they don't have a bracket arrangement for the stock Carter WCFB and you decide to use the Edelbrock AFB clone instead, you'll also need a new intake manifold, as the one you have will ONLY accept a WCFB.

                Comment

                • Paul J.
                  Expired
                  • June 30, 1999
                  • 83

                  #9
                  Re: Th-200 R4

                  A new intake manifold is NOT an option. I need a carb that will work for the stock one.

                  Comment

                  • John H.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • November 30, 1997
                    • 16513

                    #10
                    Re: Th-200 R4

                    Originally posted by Paul Jarrett (32495)
                    A new intake manifold is NOT an option. I need a carb that will work for the stock one.
                    Then you'll have to fabricate a TV cable bracket arrangement (possibly using some Lokar parts) that will work with the WCFB you have, as that's the ONLY carburetor that will fit on your existing intake manifold - it won't accept an AFB, Edelbrock, Holley, or anything else.

                    Comment

                    • Paul J.
                      Expired
                      • June 30, 1999
                      • 83

                      #11
                      Re: Th-200 R4

                      I think a manifold is now an option. Any recommendations on a stock carb and manifold setup to look as original as possible?

                      Paul
                      Parker, CO

                      Comment

                      • Paul J.
                        Expired
                        • June 30, 1999
                        • 83

                        #12
                        Re: Th-200 R4

                        Dave,

                        It sounds like you have done this conversion before. I sent you a message with our plans. Does anyone else have first hand experience (successful experience) with this conversion?

                        Paul

                        Comment

                        • Edward M.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • October 31, 1985
                          • 1916

                          #13
                          Re: Th-200 R4

                          Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
                          If they don't have a bracket arrangement for the stock Carter WCFB and you decide to use the Edelbrock AFB clone instead, you'll also need a new intake manifold, as the one you have will ONLY accept a WCFB.
                          Rochester 4GC will also bolt on, won't it? Does that help the situation any?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"