C1 Question-Intake Manifold - NCRS Discussion Boards

C1 Question-Intake Manifold

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bruce F.
    Expired
    • December 31, 1990
    • 8

    C1 Question-Intake Manifold

    Hi, My name is Bruce and I'm a First time user. In regards to a 60, 245 HP,2x4 what would be the appropriate intake manifold gasket in terms of a open exhaust cross-over or closed? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
  • John H.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • November 30, 1997
    • 16513

    #2
    Re: C1 Question-Intake Manifold

    Bruce -

    The original gasket had the crossover ports open.

    Comment

    • Clem Z.
      Expired
      • December 31, 2005
      • 9427

      #3
      Re: C1 Question-Intake Manifold

      if you want to have less carb trouble from the fuel boiling i would block the heat riser crossovers and wire open the heat riser valve. JMHO PS it will give you a few more HP !!!

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 31, 1988
        • 43191

        #4
        Re: C1 Question-Intake Manifold

        Originally posted by Clem Zahrobsky (45134)
        if you want to have less carb trouble from the fuel boiling i would block the heat riser crossovers and wire open the heat riser valve. JMHO PS it will give you a few more HP !!!
        clem and bruce-----


        I agree. It's especially do-able with a 1960 application since the choke operation does not depend on the heat cross-over.

        As far as the heat riser is concerned, you must wire it open if you block the cross-over just as clem describes. However, if that concerns you for judging purposes you can do this: remove the heat riser valve and cut out the butterfly valve, leaving the shaft intact. Re-install and you will have a heat riser valve that will operate, from appearances, in a normal manner, but will do nothing functionally.

        One caution: the above is essentially undetectable. However, in an operation check for PV, if a judge were to check the exhaust output from both sides at idle, the change may be discerned.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        • Bruce F.
          Expired
          • December 31, 1990
          • 8

          #5
          Re: C1 Question-Intake Manifold

          Hay Joe --

          Thanks for your advice, I think I will try this technique. I spent all afternoon at the parts store & on the phone trying to find the right gasket for this application to no avail! I'm told that Fel-Pro makes quality gaskets. Would you by chance have a Fel-Pro Gasket number that would be appropriate for this application? I even had the parts man behind the counter call Fel-Pro direct for help. I inquired about #1204 W/blocked crossover and was told that it would not be appropriate with a aluminum intake????? Help...

          Comment

          • Jeff S.
            Very Frequent User
            • July 31, 1984
            • 383

            #6
            Re: C1 Question-Intake Manifold

            #1256 has the embedded port seals vs. the embossed seals on the 1204. They can be configured with the exhaust crossover closed, if desired. The block-off pieces are included in the gasket set.

            Comment

            • Joe L.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • January 31, 1988
              • 43191

              #7
              Re: C1 Question-Intake Manifold

              Originally posted by Bruce Fanzlaw (18538)
              Hay Joe --

              Thanks for your advice, I think I will try this technique. I spent all afternoon at the parts store & on the phone trying to find the right gasket for this application to no avail! I'm told that Fel-Pro makes quality gaskets. Would you by chance have a Fel-Pro Gasket number that would be appropriate for this application? I even had the parts man behind the counter call Fel-Pro direct for help. I inquired about #1204 W/blocked crossover and was told that it would not be appropriate with a aluminum intake????? Help...
              Bruce-----


              You can use the #1204 or the #1256 as Jeff advises. If I recall correctly, the 1204 has no block-off plates; it's just gasket material that forms the block-off. The #1256 has the included block-off plates. I MUCH prefer the plates to the just the gasket material.

              You can also use Mr. Gasket #100. This has the block-off plates included.
              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

              Comment

              Working...
              Searching...Please wait.
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
              There are no results that meet this criteria.
              Search Result for "|||"