Correct Shifter for 67 - NCRS Discussion Boards

Correct Shifter for 67

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve M.
    Frequent User
    • October 22, 2006
    • 88

    Correct Shifter for 67

    I'm looking at a shifter and trying to determine if it is correct for my 67 or not. I found some posts in the archives on this topic which makes me believe this one is wrong for my car. In a post it said the 64-67 shifter was 7 1/2" long from top of thread to center of through hole. And the C-3 shifter is 8 1/2" long. Can someone confirm this for me? I see a number on the bottom of the shifter and it looks like 38(6)336(5). The third and seventh numbers are very hard to read. The third number could be a 5. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 31, 1988
    • 43191

    #2
    Re: Correct Shifter for 67

    Originally posted by Steve McWhirter (46412)
    I'm looking at a shifter and trying to determine if it is correct for my 67 or not. I found some posts in the archives on this topic which makes me believe this one is wrong for my car. In a post it said the 64-67 shifter was 7 1/2" long from top of thread to center of through hole. And the C-3 shifter is 8 1/2" long. Can someone confirm this for me? I see a number on the bottom of the shifter and it looks like 38(6)336(5). The third and seventh numbers are very hard to read. The third number could be a 5. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks
    Steve-----


    The easiest way to differentiate the 64-67 shifter from the later C3 shifters is the configuration of the shifter lever at the base. Look at the intersection of the rectangular base of the lever where the round shaft is welded on. On the 64-67 shifter, the rectangular base and the shaft are virtually "inline". On the 68+ shifters, the base and the shaft are "angled". The attached crude drawing illustrates what I'm talking about.
    Attached Files
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Steve M.
      Frequent User
      • October 22, 2006
      • 88

      #3
      Re: Thanks Joe

      Thanks Joe

      Comment

      Working...
      Searching...Please wait.
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
      There are no results that meet this criteria.
      Search Result for "|||"