1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad - NCRS Discussion Boards

1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard J.
    Frequent User
    • August 31, 2005
    • 83

    1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

    Hello all... I am wanting to verify an engine stamping as being correct for a 1970 but am unfamiliar with 1970 VIN stampings on the big block engine stamping pad. I have been told I should see several different things and all I can say for sure is 1970, and some 71's may be alike, the rest of 1971 is different and 1972 different again??? Can I please git some confirmation from a 70 to 72 Shark expert or two? If anyone has a picture or two they would care to share that would be great too!! Thanks Rick
    Rick Jones
    Albuquerque, NM
    Member #44319
  • Kenneth B.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • August 31, 1984
    • 2084

    #2
    Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

    Originally posted by Richard Jones (44319)
    Hello all... I am wanting to verify an engine stamping as being correct for a 1970 but am unfamiliar with 1970 VIN stampings on the big block engine stamping pad. I have been told I should see several different things and all I can say for sure is 1970, and some 71's may be alike, the rest of 1971 is different and 1972 different again??? Can I please git some confirmation from a 70 to 72 Shark expert or two? If anyone has a picture or two they would care to share that would be great too!! Thanks Rick
    OK
    Post a picture or at least let us know what #'S are on the pad now. I doubt any one else has a picture of your pad.
    KEN
    65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
    What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE

    Comment

    • Richard J.
      Frequent User
      • August 31, 2005
      • 83

      #3
      Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

      Hello again... The car has a P.O.P. and that number matches the Tonawanda Stamp. I do not have a picture that is clear but the number are as follows... T0I08CZU and in very small type is either a 70S4059XX or 10S4059XX, the picture is unclear. My question is what format is correct or are they both wrong? I want to know what it should be before I have this person verify what is stamped there and I ask for a better picture. Thanks, Rick
      Rick Jones
      Albuquerque, NM
      Member #44319

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 31, 1988
        • 43194

        #4
        Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

        Originally posted by Richard Jones (44319)
        Hello again... The car has a P.O.P. and that number matches the Tonawanda Stamp. I do not have a picture that is clear but the number are as follows... T0I08CZU and in very small type is either a 70S4059XX or 10S4059XX, the picture is unclear. My question is what format is correct or are they both wrong? I want to know what it should be before I have this person verify what is stamped there and I ask for a better picture. Thanks, Rick

        Rick-----


        The stampings sound ok to me. The VIN derivative stamping which is the smaller font size series and stamped at St. Louis should begin with "7". The last 5 digits should match the last 5 digits of the car's VIN number.

        The larger font size stamping is the engine assembly code. The "T0I08" indicates it was assembled at Tonawanda, NY on January 8. The year has to be determined by referring to the engine casting date. In your case, the last digit of the casting date should be "0", indicating 1970. The suffix code of "CZU" is correct for a 1970 LS-5 with 4 speed transmission.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        • Tom L.
          Expired
          • May 7, 2007
          • 438

          #5
          Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

          Wouldn't you expect to see a very late 69 casting date with a January 8, 1970 build date?

          Comment

          • Tom L.
            Expired
            • May 7, 2007
            • 438

            #6
            Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

            I have an additional question. Based on the VIN, the car should have a body build date of March 9th or 10th. I understand the NCRS six month rule, however, I've also heard that the typical gap between the engine build date and the body build date was between one to six weeks in big blocks of this era. I don't mean to suggest that there is an issue with the car Rick is looking at, rather, I' trying to get an understanding of how much of a gap should raise suspicion. Thanks.

            Comment

            • Joe L.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • January 31, 1988
              • 43194

              #7
              Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

              Originally posted by Tom Lynam (47343)
              Wouldn't you expect to see a very late 69 casting date with a January 8, 1970 build date?
              Tom-----


              There is often a very short time between engine cast date and engine machine/assembly date. In fact, it's even more likely for Tonawanda engines since the foundry was right next door to the engine plant. However, some big block castings do show a fairly long time between casting and machining/assembly. Certainly, this was not the general rule. It's very possible, though, that the block was cast in late 1969. I should have mentioned that in my previous post rather than saying that the block cast date should end with a "0".
              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

              Comment

              • Joe L.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • January 31, 1988
                • 43194

                #8
                Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

                Originally posted by Tom Lynam (47343)
                I have an additional question. Based on the VIN, the car should have a body build date of March 9th or 10th. I understand the NCRS six month rule, however, I've also heard that the typical gap between the engine build date and the body build date was between one to six weeks in big blocks of this era. I don't mean to suggest that there is an issue with the car Rick is looking at, rather, I' trying to get an understanding of how much of a gap should raise suspicion. Thanks.
                Tom-----


                At St. Louis the engines were not necessarily dispatched to the assembly line on the basis of first in, first out. Very often, it was last in, first out. So, an engine could remain in the engine bay for quite awhile if it was towards the rear of the bay. That's one of the reasons that I believe NCRS uses the "6 month rule".
                In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                Comment

                • Richard J.
                  Frequent User
                  • August 31, 2005
                  • 83

                  #9
                  Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

                  1970 is a very funny year for big blocks, I already know this... It is not uncommon to see a September/October Casting Date with a January build in an Early March car. My question is about the VIN derivative that is stamped on the engine pad. 70 is unique and I want information on EXACTLY what the format is before I look any further into this issue with the fellow I am talking with. Should I see a 70S4XXXXX or 10S4XXXXX? I think it is the 70S4XXXX. I know engine assembly dates.... I know what is acceptable for spans between casting dates, assembly dates and when they were installed in the cars. 1970, especially early in 1970, was a real learning curve for St. Louis as the 454 was new, production stated 4 months late and there was a big strike that had just come to an end... I know this all, I would like some proof of how the VIN derivative should be stamped into the block on the engine pad. Thanks
                  Rick Jones
                  Albuquerque, NM
                  Member #44319

                  Comment

                  • Tom L.
                    Expired
                    • May 7, 2007
                    • 438

                    #10
                    Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

                    My June of 1970 LS-5 VIN stamp is 70S412XXX. It is identical to the VIN stamp on the transmission. The same stamping tool was used on the block and transmission.

                    Comment

                    • Joe L.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • January 31, 1988
                      • 43194

                      #11
                      Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

                      Originally posted by Richard Jones (44319)
                      1970 is a very funny year for big blocks, I already know this... It is not uncommon to see a September/October Casting Date with a January build in an Early March car. My question is about the VIN derivative that is stamped on the engine pad. 70 is unique and I want information on EXACTLY what the format is before I look any further into this issue with the fellow I am talking with. Should I see a 70S4XXXXX or 10S4XXXXX? I think it is the 70S4XXXX. I know engine assembly dates.... I know what is acceptable for spans between casting dates, assembly dates and when they were installed in the cars. 1970, especially early in 1970, was a real learning curve for St. Louis as the 454 was new, production stated 4 months late and there was a big strike that had just come to an end... I know this all, I would like some proof of how the VIN derivative should be stamped into the block on the engine pad. Thanks
                      Rick-----


                      That kind of "proof", I don't think that anyone is going to be able to give you here. For one thing, these stampings were never done in a precise sort of manner. Your best bet if you want to verify the stamping is original is to consult with Al Grenning. Al has done a long-term, major study of block stampings. I'd say he's the one that's in the best position to render an opinion on the authenticity of the stamping in question.
                      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                      Comment

                      • D S.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • February 28, 2005
                        • 1551

                        #12
                        Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

                        First, I wold like to encourage you to register your '70 with the 1970 Corvette Registry. It has a photographic library and there are three or four clear photos of what the engine pad shows as far as stamping.



                        Comment

                        • Warren F.
                          Expired
                          • November 30, 1987
                          • 1516

                          #13
                          Re: 1970 Corvette Big Block Engine Pad

                          Rick,

                          Good to hear, that you frequent this board, now and then.

                          I had 3 '70 LS5 Corvettes, vin#'s 6664, 7272, & 8373. All had the vin sequencing as 70S406664, 70S407272, & 70S408373 as stamped on the engine pad area.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"