I'm looking at a 66 427 425HP conv to buy from a local guy. The engine appears original to me. The VIN is clearly correct on the front pad. The cars birthday was oct 12 65. The block was cast I2265(sept) and assembled Sept 28 65. Does this sound OK or are the dates to close? The car is a total basket case now needing total restoration. I think this is the original engine. What are your thoughts on the dates?
66 427 dates
Collapse
X
-
65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE- Top
Comment
-
- Top
Comment
-
Re: 66 427 dates
If you're about to pay the 'original engine surcharge' for this car, best have someone like Al Grenning look at the pad.- Top
Comment
-
Re: 66 427 dates
NCRS uses that six month rule and I think most of us have not seen such a spread. I can attest to a 67 435 coupe in my town in the hands of the original owner, and a car I have known since new, that has a block casting date of September xx (can't remember), 1966 and an assembly date of Feb 10, 1967...close to 5 months. This is an original motor car and will show up on the judging field in another year or so for the very first time.Avatar--My first ever vette, owned 3X since 1977, restored 1993-2024. Top Flight Award 9/14/24- Top
Comment
-
Re: 66 427 dates
The real issue is the "last in first out" inventory control when blocks were delivered to the engine plants from the foundries. If production was "normal" 24-72 hours from casting to finished engine was likely the norm, but if there was a problem at the foundry and the inventory got low, the blocks from the "back of the pile" started being used to maintain production. The only real attempt to "clear" the system would have been at model change when the next model required a different block. That's also when some factory altered casting numbers (ground off and stamped) are (very occasionally) seen.Bill Clupper #618- Top
Comment
Comment