66 427 dates - NCRS Discussion Boards

66 427 dates

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeff D.
    Expired
    • April 30, 1995
    • 95

    66 427 dates

    I'm looking at a 66 427 425HP conv to buy from a local guy. The engine appears original to me. The VIN is clearly correct on the front pad. The cars birthday was oct 12 65. The block was cast I2265(sept) and assembled Sept 28 65. Does this sound OK or are the dates to close? The car is a total basket case now needing total restoration. I think this is the original engine. What are your thoughts on the dates?
  • Wayne W.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • April 30, 1982
    • 3605

    #2
    Re: 66 427 dates

    I would expect that number to be I225 not I2265. But Six days to assemnly from casting is normal.

    Comment

    • Joseph T.
      Very Frequent User
      • March 1, 1986
      • 169

      #3
      Re: 66 427 dates

      Jeff,
      I owned a 1966 427/390 HP convertible with original casting date E106 (May 10,1966) and engine assembly date of TO518IL (May 18,1966). The block should be original.Good Luck.

      Comment

      • Kenneth B.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • August 31, 1984
        • 2088

        #4
        Re: 66 427 dates

        Originally posted by Wayne Womble
        I would expect that number to be I225 not I2265. But Six days to assemnly from casting is normal.
        I agree date tag would be I 22 5. Months were letters IE. A is JAN
        KEN BARRY 7808
        65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
        What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE

        Comment

        • John K.
          Expired
          • December 2, 2010
          • 24

          #5
          Re: 66 427 dates

          Could a casting date of C96 with a assembly date of T0513 be correct with car bulid date of June 9th?

          Comment

          • John H.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • December 1, 1997
            • 16513

            #6
            Re: 66 427 dates

            Originally posted by John Kohler (52520)
            Could a casting date of C96 with a assembly date of T0513 be correct with car bulid date of June 9th?
            Yes, it could; it's not uncommon to see a month or two between big-block casting dates and engine assembly dates.

            Comment

            • John K.
              Expired
              • December 2, 2010
              • 24

              #7
              Re: 66 427 dates

              Thanks John

              Comment

              • Michael W.
                Expired
                • April 1, 1997
                • 4290

                #8
                Re: 66 427 dates

                If you're about to pay the 'original engine surcharge' for this car, best have someone like Al Grenning look at the pad.

                Comment

                • Gary S.
                  Super Moderator
                  • February 1, 1984
                  • 457

                  #9
                  Re: 66 427 dates

                  Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
                  Yes, it could; it's not uncommon to see a month or two between big-block casting dates and engine assembly dates.

                  NCRS uses that six month rule and I think most of us have not seen such a spread. I can attest to a 67 435 coupe in my town in the hands of the original owner, and a car I have known since new, that has a block casting date of September xx (can't remember), 1966 and an assembly date of Feb 10, 1967...close to 5 months. This is an original motor car and will show up on the judging field in another year or so for the very first time.
                  Avatar--My first ever vette, owned 3X since 1977, restored 1993-2024. Top Flight Award 9/14/24

                  Comment

                  • William C.
                    NCRS Past President
                    • May 31, 1975
                    • 6037

                    #10
                    Re: 66 427 dates

                    The real issue is the "last in first out" inventory control when blocks were delivered to the engine plants from the foundries. If production was "normal" 24-72 hours from casting to finished engine was likely the norm, but if there was a problem at the foundry and the inventory got low, the blocks from the "back of the pile" started being used to maintain production. The only real attempt to "clear" the system would have been at model change when the next model required a different block. That's also when some factory altered casting numbers (ground off and stamped) are (very occasionally) seen.
                    Bill Clupper #618

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    Searching...Please wait.
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                    There are no results that meet this criteria.
                    Search Result for "|||"