Frame pull date - NCRS Discussion Boards

Frame pull date

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gary B.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • February 1, 1997
    • 7053

    #16
    Originally posted by Mark Francis (30800)

    Joe,

    An H9 Body Build Date (BBD) for both St. louis and AOS bodies is March 9, 1965
    Mark,

    Is the body build date code system different for ‘66 from ‘65? For ‘66, a St Louis bodied car with an H9 code would decode to April 9, whereas for an AO Smith bodied car H9 in ‘66 would be March. 9. That’s not the case for ‘65?

    Gary

    Comment

    • Mark F.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • July 31, 1998
      • 1570

      #17
      Originally posted by Gary Beaupre (28818)
      Mark, Is the body build date code system different for ‘66 from ‘65? Apparently For ‘66, a St Louis bodied car with an H9 code would decode to April 9, whereas for an AO Smith bodied car H9 in ‘66 would be March. 9. Yes, that's what I see in a '66 TIMJG I have. That’s not the case for ‘65? see below... Gary
      Hi Gary,

      I got my info from an older version of the '65 TIMJG off of the 1965 Body Build Date Codes and Final Monthly Serial Numbers Table.

      Unlike the '66 TIMJG, that Table does not discriminate between St. Louis and AOS bodies - August 1964 is listed as month "A" with a final serial of 100227 (IOW only 227 cars produced, which by my guess is roughly 2 days production).

      It might even be only 1 day of production if AOS made 1/2 of those bodies...
      All supposition on my part, but somebody out there knows
      thx,
      Mark

      Comment

      • Jack M.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • March 1, 1991
        • 1177

        #18
        Herez a handy C2 Trim Plate Guide from Mid America (see ATTACHED).

        I've also been searching the archives for pertinent data on the 'pull date'.
        Lotza conflicting info to sort thru... I hope to post a summary, in the near future.

        1963-1967 Corvette Trim Plate Guide.pdf

        Comment

        • Gary B.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • February 1, 1997
          • 7053

          #19
          Jack, Mark,

          I wish they had kept the unified ‘65 build date code system for ‘66. It would have been less confusing.

          Gary

          Comment

          • Mark F.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • July 31, 1998
            • 1570

            #20
            Originally posted by Gary Beaupre (28818)
            Jack, Mark, I wish they had kept the unified ‘65 build date code system for ‘66. It would have been less confusing. Gary
            Hi Gary,

            Yeah, I agree.
            The '67 TIMJG parallels the '65 in that St. Louis vs AOS (DowSmith) bodies are not broken out with different codes.
            Either no cars made it to the roll off in Aug 1966 - or the serials for those that did are not known for August of 1966.
            image.png

            However, i just noticed in my copy of the '65, the last two months of production have the same body build date code "L" - actually looks like only 2 cars (23563 and 23564) lopped over into August 1966...

            There's a reason out there somewhere, but we'll probably never know what it is

            image.png
            thx,
            Mark

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"