Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines - NCRS Discussion Boards

Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard L.
    Very Frequent User
    • November 1, 1984
    • 193

    Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

    I am running approximately 10.5:1 compression in one of my vintage cars and have been advised by the engine builder that it would be good insurance to add a can of VP Racing Fuel Additive 2855 to each full tank of gas, even if it's premium, given the uneven quality of today's gasoline. I trust his advice as well as his technical and mechanical expertise although I wonder if his specific brand recommendation needs to be followed implicitly. VP is a trustworthy brand used nationwide by racers and builder of high- performance engines but are there other brands equally effective in raising octane ratings? I want to stay clear of the fake, snake-oil manufacturers with unsubstantiated claims and shaky reputations. Can anyone here provide some additional expert recommendation and advice.
    Thank you in advance.
    ric
  • Leif A.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • August 31, 1997
    • 3625

    #2
    Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

    Richard,
    If your car is tuned correctly (timing, A/F adjustments, correct vacuum cannister using manifold vacuum, spark plugs, and wires) you don't need any additional additives to your gasoline. If you have 93 octane with no more than 10% alcohol you shouldn't have any issues whatsoever.
    Leif
    '67 Coupe L79, M21, C60, N14, N40, J50, A31, U69, A01, QB1
    Top Flight 2017 Lone Star Regional

    Comment

    • Duke W.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • January 1, 1993
      • 15661

      #3
      Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

      Most original "high compression" engines (and most have been rebuilt with "lower" compression") will operate detonation-free on the highest locally available PON and many will operate on less.

      Each case is unique, so in order to make an educated guess more information is needed about your SPECIFIC engine configuration and operating conditions.

      What's the make, model, year, and engine option? Is it original? Rebuilt? Modified?

      How was the CR arrived at? Was a compression ratio calculator used with all the requisite accurately measured input data like head chamber volume. piston dome or dish volume. deck clearance, and head gasket thickness?

      What is idle vacuum? Measure in neutral if a manual transmission and Drive if an automatic, Report as XX" Hg @ yyy RPM.

      What is the altitude range you drive in and typical highest ambient temperature?

      What are the PON ratings for locally available gasoline and which one are you using.

      Are you hearing any detonation (knock, ping) and if so under what operating conditions?

      If you can report all the above I can give you some guidance, but it ultimately requires some testing and perhaps some modifications to the spark advance map.

      Duke

      Comment

      • Richard L.
        Very Frequent User
        • November 1, 1984
        • 193

        #4
        Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

        Thank you both for your considered replies. The engine in question is far from stock and in high state of tune so none of the usual considerations apply. It needs higher octane fuel than gas pumps provide though not quite the ratings that race gas provides.

        Comment

        • Duke W.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • January 1, 1993
          • 15661

          #5
          Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

          Engines with "big cams" can tolerate higher compression ratios than mild cams. It's not the overlap, but the late closing inlet valve that causes reversion resulting in low VE (and low torque) at lower revs, which is when detonation is most prevalent. Exhaust gas dilution due to the high overlap slows combustion propagation, so they like and can tolerate more low rev spark advance than mild cams. If you don't understand this you will learn more from my tuning seminar, which is attached to the "restoration documents" thread near the end of the sticky section.

          Though specifics apply to Chevrolet small and big block V8s, other American V-8s are pretty much the same having wedge combustion chambers, so optimum spark advance maps aren't that much different. The Chrysler hemis might be one exception.

          ... sounds like you'll have to do your own experimentation, but a lot of so-called "octane boosters" are snake oil and their "points" are 0.1, not 1.0. Good luck!

          Duke

          Comment

          • Joseph W.
            Very Frequent User
            • February 20, 2022
            • 368

            #6
            Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

            I have a buddy that swears by this stuff.
            H runs it in his Hemi Cuda and his 70 Z28
            He buys it by the case
            Anyone on the board ever try it?

            http://www.wildbillscorvette.com/OctaneSupreme01.htm

            Comment

            • Rocco S.
              Very Frequent User
              • December 21, 2013
              • 176

              #7
              Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

              I have been using the Octane Supreme for about 9 years in my original 1967 L79. The engine has 11:1 compression ratio. It seemed to have helped the slight pinging problem I had when climing a hill or when it was extremely hot.

              I am currently working with member, Duke Williams to modify my VAC and distributor mechanical advance springs in the hopes I can run straight 93 octane. He seems very knowledgeble on the subject. I was originally thinking of mixing 50/50 93 octane (10% ethanol) with 100LL aviation fuel which is available locally to eliminate the octane booster. Hopefully things will work out.

              As a side note today a new service center opened in my area offering 3 grades of non-ethanol fuel. 87, 89 and 93. and the price is not bad for the 93. I plan on switching to this non-ethanol in the future.

              Non Ethanol Gas.jpg

              Rocco
              ROCCO SCOTELLARO
              1967 Lynndale Blue/Black Coupe L79, M21, G81 (3.70:1), A31, A82, C60, K66, N11, U69

              Comment

              • Mark E.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • April 1, 1993
                • 4528

                #8
                Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

                Agree with the comments above. Under 11:1 you can tune the engine to work with the fuel available. Select an advance curve and adjust static timing to achieve no detonation at full throttle with VAC disconnected. Then select a VAC that works at cruise and light loads. I recommend a variable VAC for this.
                Mark Edmondson
                Dallas, Texas
                Texas Chapter

                1970 Coupe, Donnybrooke Green, Light Saddle LS5 M20 A31 C60 G81 N37 N40 UA6 U79
                1993 Coupe, 40th Anniversary, 6-speed, PEG 1, FX3, CD, Bronze Top

                Comment

                • Larry E.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • December 1, 1989
                  • 1673

                  #9
                  Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

                  Can not understand why you guys go through all the trouble WITH these "gimmicks".(Changing timing/head gaskets/adding
                  additives and etc.. Just buy the gas that is available now that is the closest gas THAT WAS AVAILABLE WHEN YOUR
                  CHEVROLET ENGINE WAS MADE namely>100LL at your local airport + that fact it last so much longer with out gumming
                  up and getting bad. Of course>JMHO. Larry P.S. Your car will Start/Idle/Run so much better and you keep your engine
                  ALL ORIGINAL
                  Larry

                  LT1 in a 1LE -- One of 134

                  Comment

                  • Mark E.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • April 1, 1993
                    • 4528

                    #10
                    Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

                    Originally posted by Larry Evoskis (16324)
                    Can not understand why you guys go through all the trouble WITH these "gimmicks".(Changing timing/head gaskets/adding
                    additives and etc.. Just buy the gas that is available now that is the closest gas THAT WAS AVAILABLE WHEN YOUR
                    CHEVROLET ENGINE WAS MADE namely>100LL at your local airport + that fact it last so much longer with out gumming
                    up and getting bad. Of course>JMHO. Larry P.S. Your car will Start/Idle/Run so much better and you keep your engine
                    ALL ORIGINAL
                    Gimmick is harsh. I would say "tuning". It’s more convenient than filling up with Jerry cans, less expensive and yields good performance.
                    Plus no lead deposits in the combustion chamber, valves, plugs and exhaust (remember that problem?).
                    Mark Edmondson
                    Dallas, Texas
                    Texas Chapter

                    1970 Coupe, Donnybrooke Green, Light Saddle LS5 M20 A31 C60 G81 N37 N40 UA6 U79
                    1993 Coupe, 40th Anniversary, 6-speed, PEG 1, FX3, CD, Bronze Top

                    Comment

                    • Larry E.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • December 1, 1989
                      • 1673

                      #11
                      Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

                      THAT'S THE WAY CHEVROLET DESIGNED YOUR ENGINE; FOR THE MILES MOST OWNERS PUT ON IN
                      A YEAR THIS PROBLEM IS IRRELEVANT. OF COURSE JMHO

                      Mark: Thanks for your comments; let me respond under your comments above.
                      Larry

                      LT1 in a 1LE -- One of 134

                      Comment

                      • Terry D.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • May 31, 1987
                        • 2691

                        #12
                        Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

                        For those who only put a few miles a month on their car 100 aviation fuel is an easy fix, but for someone like me who puts 5 to 7 thousand miles a year on their car it is not so good. I'm preparing for a fall foilage trip from Ohio to Statesville by way of The Tail of the Dragon. If I had to rely on airport fuel I'd be done for. I agree with Mark and Duke if you take the time to tune your motor correctly there is no need for 100 octane fuel. But that's just my old two cents!

                        Comment

                        • Duke W.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • January 1, 1993
                          • 15661

                          #13
                          Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

                          Originally posted by Rocco Scotellaro (59333)
                          I have been using the Octane Supreme for about 9 years in my original 1967 L79. The engine has 11:1 compression ratio. It seemed to have helped the slight pinging problem I had when climing a hill or when it was extremely hot.

                          I am currently working with member, Duke Williams to modify my VAC and distributor mechanical advance springs in the hopes I can run straight 93 octane. He seems very knowledgeble on the subject. I was originally thinking of mixing 50/50 93 octane (10% ethanol) with 100LL aviation fuel which is available locally to eliminate the octane booster. Hopefully things will work out.

                          As a side note today a new service center opened in my area offering 3 grades of non-ethanol fuel. 87, 89 and 93. and the price is not bad for the 93. I plan on switching to this non-ethanol in the future.

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]123854[/ATTACH]

                          Rocco
                          It's great that you have the three grades of NON-ETHANOL gasoline, but the prices are about as bad as California, especially the 93 PON. The highest PON we have in CA is 91 and non-ethanol is rare.

                          Duke

                          Comment

                          • Patrick H.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • December 1, 1989
                            • 11642

                            #14
                            Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

                            Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
                            It's great that you have the three grades of NON-ETHANOL gasoline, but the prices are about as bad as California, especially the 93 PON. The highest PON we have in CA is 91 and non-ethanol is rare.

                            Duke
                            Those prices seem great to me for non-ethanol, and similar to the usual 10% ethanol swill they sell.
                            Vice-Chairman (West), Michigan Chapter NCRS
                            71 "deer modified" coupe
                            72 5-Star Bowtie / Duntov coupe. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124695...57649252735124
                            2008 coupe
                            Available stickers: Engine suffix code, exhaust tips & mufflers, shocks, AIR diverter valve broadcast code.

                            Comment

                            • Bruce M.
                              Infrequent User
                              • January 9, 2014
                              • 27

                              #15
                              Re: Fuel Additives for High Compression Engines

                              I used the Octane Supreme for years to boost the non-ethanol 91 to 93 in my original, unrestored L36. It's nasty stuff (tetra ethyl lead) but it eliminated the occasional ping on WOT. Now we have the non-ethanol 93 locally and it behaves the same.

                              Bruce

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"