Trying to determine if the fuel pump mount plate and the two larger upper bolts used to secure the fuel pump on my car are NCRS correct?
Both upper fuel pump mounting bolts on my car are the same size. My 5th edition NCRS book, P. 149, par. 2 states "one style bolt has a 7/16" hex and another style is a 9/16" hex". If I am interpreting this corectly, the book is saying the two larger upper bolts that hold the fuel pump to the block are 9/16" and the two lower smaller bolts that hold the lower mount plate to the block are 7/16" hex head bolts. I think I have that part right.
The two larger upper bolts are both exactly the same dimensions and type:
9/16" wrench, indented hex head with 3/8" x 3/16" wide integral split ring lock washer, zinc-plated with anchor head mark
3/8" - 16 x 1 1/2" long
Question #1: I thought the foreward bolt was longer so that it could be removed and reinstalled in the front of the block to hold the internal plunger rod for the mechanical fuel pump. Both of my bolts are 1 1/2" long. Seemed odd to me.
On to the mount plate PN 3719599 in my '69 AIM book P. J207 item #10 in detailed parts list. My NCRS 5th edition book says the mount plate is a flat natural-steel unplated plate. Mine is painted. no big deal, I can strip that off. I am not sure that the right mount plate is on the car. Is there a way to tell? Should there be a PN stamp, an embossed number or letter(s) stamped on the mount plate if it is original.
Question #2: Someone along the history of the car globbed on a gray silicone sealant all over the fuel pump mount plate I assume to stop a leak or prevent a leak. Makes me wonder if I have the wrong mount plate on the car. There is a PIERCE "made in USA" aftermarket fuel pump on the car now. It is being replaced with a correct PN 40658 fuel pump for a 350 Hp motor. I want to make sure that I have the right mount plate before I bolt on the NCRS correct fuel pump. I do have two new gaskets that go between the mount plate and the block and between the fuel pump and the mount plate.
Question #3: is it a good idea to put a little bit (of gasket sealant) on each side of the gaskets to help get a better seal or will the gaskets seal just fine all by themselves.
Questiion #4: My AIM book P. J207 shows the torque spec for the larger upper 3/8 - 16 x 1 1/2" fuel pump mounting bolts that secure the fuel pump itself to the block as 25-30 LBS FT. Okay that makes sense to me - they are good size bolts. However, the torque specs for the smaller 1/4" - 20 x 1/2" two bolts that hold the mount plate to the block are shown as 32-40 LBS FT. Is it possible a 1/4" dia. bolt the holds the mount plate has a higher torque spec than the 3/8" dia upper bolts that secure the fuel pump itself to the block. I sure DO NOT want to break off a bolt inside the engine block by following a torque spec that is wrong???
Note: I would normally put orange thread locker on all of these bolts just to help prevent them from loosening over time.
Thanks in advance for your input and observations.
Kevin
Both upper fuel pump mounting bolts on my car are the same size. My 5th edition NCRS book, P. 149, par. 2 states "one style bolt has a 7/16" hex and another style is a 9/16" hex". If I am interpreting this corectly, the book is saying the two larger upper bolts that hold the fuel pump to the block are 9/16" and the two lower smaller bolts that hold the lower mount plate to the block are 7/16" hex head bolts. I think I have that part right.
The two larger upper bolts are both exactly the same dimensions and type:
9/16" wrench, indented hex head with 3/8" x 3/16" wide integral split ring lock washer, zinc-plated with anchor head mark
3/8" - 16 x 1 1/2" long
Question #1: I thought the foreward bolt was longer so that it could be removed and reinstalled in the front of the block to hold the internal plunger rod for the mechanical fuel pump. Both of my bolts are 1 1/2" long. Seemed odd to me.
On to the mount plate PN 3719599 in my '69 AIM book P. J207 item #10 in detailed parts list. My NCRS 5th edition book says the mount plate is a flat natural-steel unplated plate. Mine is painted. no big deal, I can strip that off. I am not sure that the right mount plate is on the car. Is there a way to tell? Should there be a PN stamp, an embossed number or letter(s) stamped on the mount plate if it is original.
Question #2: Someone along the history of the car globbed on a gray silicone sealant all over the fuel pump mount plate I assume to stop a leak or prevent a leak. Makes me wonder if I have the wrong mount plate on the car. There is a PIERCE "made in USA" aftermarket fuel pump on the car now. It is being replaced with a correct PN 40658 fuel pump for a 350 Hp motor. I want to make sure that I have the right mount plate before I bolt on the NCRS correct fuel pump. I do have two new gaskets that go between the mount plate and the block and between the fuel pump and the mount plate.
Question #3: is it a good idea to put a little bit (of gasket sealant) on each side of the gaskets to help get a better seal or will the gaskets seal just fine all by themselves.
Questiion #4: My AIM book P. J207 shows the torque spec for the larger upper 3/8 - 16 x 1 1/2" fuel pump mounting bolts that secure the fuel pump itself to the block as 25-30 LBS FT. Okay that makes sense to me - they are good size bolts. However, the torque specs for the smaller 1/4" - 20 x 1/2" two bolts that hold the mount plate to the block are shown as 32-40 LBS FT. Is it possible a 1/4" dia. bolt the holds the mount plate has a higher torque spec than the 3/8" dia upper bolts that secure the fuel pump itself to the block. I sure DO NOT want to break off a bolt inside the engine block by following a torque spec that is wrong???
Note: I would normally put orange thread locker on all of these bolts just to help prevent them from loosening over time.
Thanks in advance for your input and observations.
Kevin
Comment