Double Stamped Pad - NCRS Discussion Boards

Double Stamped Pad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scott P.
    Very Frequent User
    • April 30, 1992
    • 177

    Double Stamped Pad

    IMG_9224(1).jpg

    Gentlemen, this exercise to for you to decide what the last two numbers of this blocks VIN
    are. The 64 300hp Corvette is long gone with the answer to this question so we need for
    you to solve the mystery for us.
    The engine will be rebuilt and ready for another 64 Corvette.
    Thanks Scott
  • Jimmy G.
    Very Frequent User
    • October 31, 1979
    • 975

    #2
    Re: Double Stamped Pad

    this happened more often than you think I think 10 was changed to 09 Friend of mine had a c3 the same way
    Founder - Carolinas Chapter NCRS

    Comment

    • Leif A.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • August 31, 1997
      • 3601

      #3
      Re: Double Stamped Pad

      I concur with Jimmy. My '67 has a double stamped VIN.
      Attached Files
      Leif
      '67 Coupe L79, M21, C60, N14, N40, J50, A31, U69, A01, QB1
      Top Flight 2017 Lone Star Regional

      Comment

      • Mike M.
        NCRS Past President
        • May 31, 1974
        • 8363

        #4
        Re: Double Stamped Pad

        big difference I Leif's pad( the double set of numerals are the same numerals, ie , its a bounce back stamping. the OP's pad stamping consists of a different set of numerals. its been y experience that an incorrect vin stamping in st Louis would have resulted in a grind out, which isn't the case with the OP'S PAD. MIKE

        Comment

        • Mark E.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • March 31, 1993
          • 4497

          #5
          Re: Double Stamped Pad

          Originally posted by Mike McCagh (14)
          big difference I Leif's pad( the double set of numerals are the same numerals, ie , its a bounce back stamping. the OP's pad stamping consists of a different set of numerals. its been y experience that an incorrect vin stamping in st Louis would have resulted in a grind out, which isn't the case with the OP'S PAD. MIKE
          So a mistake by a factory worker who didn't grind first? Or maybe the mistake was found and corrected after the car shipped?
          Mark Edmondson
          Dallas, Texas
          Texas Chapter

          1970 Coupe, Donnybrooke Green, Light Saddle LS5 M20 A31 C60 G81 N37 N40 UA6 U79
          1993 Coupe, 40th Anniversary, 6-speed, PEG 1, FX3, CD, Bronze Top

          Comment

          • Larry E.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • November 30, 1989
            • 1643

            #6
            Re: Double Stamped Pad

            Even though the below is not an engine block it shows a "bounce back" double stamp. I think this
            is fairly common on GM components. I remember talking to the Late John Pirkle on this subject and
            he indicated he did see many on these through out his rebuilding years. Picture Below>(Lower Left "6")
            Attached Files
            Larry

            LT1 in a 1LE -- One of 134

            Comment

            • Mark F.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • July 31, 1998
              • 1458

              #7
              Re: Double Stamped Pad

              Originally posted by Larry Evoskis (16324)
              Even though the below is not an engine block it shows a "bounce back" double stamp. I think this is fairly common on GM components. I remember talking to the Late John Pirkle on this subject and
              he indicated he did see many on these through out his rebuilding years. Picture Below>(Lower Left "6")
              Larry,

              If I am not mistaken, I believe some of the round cast parts like that were "roll-stamped"...meaning they were place in a fixture and the "stamp" characters were rolled-in (pressed or crimped) into the round part being "stamped" (alternator; starter housing; etc.).

              I don't believe they were hand stamped w/ a gang stamp like the PAD and trans were.

              Anyhow, with wear and slight movement of the part or the character within its' holder could make the defect you show.
              Others may have more info on that - I know I've seen that somewhere - dunno if it's here on TDB or somewhere else.
              thx,
              Mark

              Comment

              • Joe R.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • July 31, 1976
                • 4547

                #8
                Re: Double Stamped Pad

                Both of the above pads are missing something. Maybe it's just the light!

                Then again?????

                JR

                Comment

                • Leif A.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • August 31, 1997
                  • 3601

                  #9
                  Re: Double Stamped Pad

                  Originally posted by Joe Ray (1011)
                  Both of the above pads are missing something. Maybe it's just the light!

                  Then again?????

                  JR
                  JR,
                  Does this one give you any more confidence? I've never had anyone question this stamp pad before.
                  Attached Files
                  Leif
                  '67 Coupe L79, M21, C60, N14, N40, J50, A31, U69, A01, QB1
                  Top Flight 2017 Lone Star Regional

                  Comment

                  • Owen L.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • September 30, 1991
                    • 828

                    #10
                    Re: Double Stamped Pad

                    Originally posted by Scott Pfuehler (20940)
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]118801[/ATTACH]
                    I'm no expert, but I play one on the internet...
                    I'm inclined to believe this is a factory anomaly. It looks to me like 4121010 was overstamped with 009. What are the odds that the owner of #009 needed a replacement block and found #010?!? And, knew the value of the VIN sequence on the block but didn't bother to hide the previous number before putting his own VIN on there? AND didn't think anyone down the road would notice? (The pad background looks very good too with no rotary machining marks that I can see.)

                    I think someone loading the gang holder jumped the gun on what number had just been used and what the next # should be.

                    Comment

                    • Jack M.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • March 1, 1991
                      • 1132

                      #11
                      Re: Double Stamped Pad

                      Because of the various stamp pad images and discussions, I thought this repeat contribution might be helpful.

                      Whatz the possibility that the double strike/ghost image/second stamp/rebound/bounce was actually performed FIRST... and on purpose? Visualize a line worker holding the gang stamp, placing it on the block, raising the hammer slightly and giving it a 'slight' tap (almost in a setting/adjusting/practice motion) before raising the hammer higher and firmly striking the final stamp. Could the stamp move slightly between the first and final blow? And if the LIGHTER stamp appears UNDER the final stamp... wouldn't that support a theory, that it occurred FIRST?

                      In this animation (NOT my engine), I isolated the date stamp and moved it over to show the exact correlation of the stamped characters.
                      Double_Strike-1b.gif

                      If the photos are taken at hi-resolution, and then zoomed in, you observe a few cases (certainly not all), what appears to be the faint/rebound/bounce stamp carried thru to the DEEPER stamp. It could be a shadow or illusion... I'm not certain. Neither am I a metallurgist, but I can't see how a light 'bounce' (or second stamp) could possibly penetrate to the BOTTOM of the deeper stamp (especially on cast iron). To me, I'd surmise it could occur if the engine pad was initially deformed FIRST by the light/setup tap. That slightly deformed metal, could then cast a different appearance at the base of the SECOND/DEEPER/FINAL stamp.
                      Double_Strike-1c.jpg

                      Double_Strike-1d.jpg

                      Just one additional suggestion... and for you older folks, remember back to the old 'Dragnet' TV series. When they hit the 'Mark VII Limited' logo, it was indeed a DOUBLE STRIKE of the hammer:

                      Comment

                      • James G.
                        Very Frequent User
                        • August 22, 2018
                        • 783

                        #12
                        Re: Double Stamped Pad

                        FWIW
                        I can see the faint indent of a couple of charcters on a third impression at about the same interval and angle down as the very visible 2nd.
                        James A Groome
                        1971 LT1 11130 - https://photos.app.goo.gl/zSoFz24JMPXw5Ffi9 - the black LT1
                        1971 LT1 21783 - 3 STAR Preservation.- https://photos.app.goo.gl/wMRDJgmyDyAwc9Nh8 - Brandshatch Green LT1
                        My first gen Camaro research http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.p...owposts;u=4337
                        Posts on Yenko boards... https://www.yenko.net/forum/search.php?searchid=826453

                        Comment

                        • Mark F.
                          Extremely Frequent Poster
                          • July 31, 1998
                          • 1458

                          #13
                          Re: Double Stamped Pad

                          Originally posted by Jack Morocco (18851)
                          ...Just one additional suggestion... and for you older folks, remember back to the old 'Dragnet' TV series. When they hit the 'Mark VII Limited' logo, it was indeed a DOUBLE STRIKE of the hammer:
                          Mr. Morocco,
                          you have amazing talents !
                          thx,
                          Mark

                          Comment

                          • Jaime G.
                            Very Frequent User
                            • March 31, 1988
                            • 480

                            #14
                            Re: Double Stamped Pad

                            Originally posted by Joe Ray (1011)
                            Both of the above pads are missing something. Maybe it's just the light!

                            Then again?????

                            JR
                            Could it be that neither pad shows an original pad surface? The surface is always present before any stamping occurs.

                            Comment

                            • Jack M.
                              Extremely Frequent Poster
                              • March 1, 1991
                              • 1132

                              #15
                              Re: Double Stamped Pad

                              Originally posted by Mark Francis (30800)
                              Mr. M,
                              you have amazing talents !
                              Naaa... just too much spare time (and a better alternative to doing laundry or cleaning the house). LOL

                              BTW- I can clearly see the broach marks in the top (1st) image... the other image is at an acute angle, with a little harsher lighting.
                              I seriously doubt that the pad surface was totally consistent... would new blades leave the same surface texture as worn blades?
                              Were all Corvettes stored in a hermetically sealed environment? Itz just one aspect of an evaluation... also called, a best guess.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"