1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure - NCRS Discussion Boards

1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Daniel S.
    Very Frequent User
    • July 25, 2017
    • 117

    1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

    Hi,

    I just installed the driveshaft in my 1960 after having my Borg Warner rebuilt. The actual yoke shaft exposure is 2 inches showing - is that correct. I have the 4 and 3/4 inch yoke which is supposed to be correct. Also does anyone have the drive shaft length - I bought this car in pieces - no engine or transmission and was wondering if it is the right driveshaft?.

    Thanks

    Dan
  • Kent S.
    Very Frequent User
    • January 31, 1993
    • 203

    #2
    Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

    Are the rear wheels on the ground (or ramps) rather than hanging? I've always thought 3/4" was the correct "exposure" but others may have a different opinion.

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • January 31, 1988
      • 43191

      #3
      Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

      Originally posted by Daniel Stairiker (63817)
      Hi,

      I just installed the driveshaft in my 1960 after having my Borg Warner rebuilt. The actual yoke shaft exposure is 2 inches showing - is that correct. I have the 4 and 3/4 inch yoke which is supposed to be correct. Also does anyone have the drive shaft length - I bought this car in pieces - no engine or transmission and was wondering if it is the right driveshaft?.



      Thanks

      Dan
      Daniel------


      Driveshaft length was 34-35/64" end-to-end.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Daniel S.
        Very Frequent User
        • July 25, 2017
        • 117

        #4
        Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

        Thanks Joe I will measure the drive shaft tomorrow .

        Comment

        • Daniel S.
          Very Frequent User
          • July 25, 2017
          • 117

          #5
          Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

          HI Kent,

          I have the car up on blocks but simulating like it would be on wheels. I will measure the driveshaft per Joe's measurements.

          Comment

          • Daniel S.
            Very Frequent User
            • July 25, 2017
            • 117

            #6
            Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

            Hi Joe,

            I assume that when you say end to end it is from center of u joint to center of u joint which it looks like is the correct length.

            Thank you

            Comment

            • Joe L.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • January 31, 1988
              • 43191

              #7
              Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

              Originally posted by Daniel Stairiker (63817)
              Hi Joe,

              I assume that when you say end to end it is from center of u joint to center of u joint which it looks like is the correct length.

              Thank you
              Daniel-------


              Well, according to GM it's end-to-end. However, I have found in the past that when they say end-to-end they actually mean center-to-center.
              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

              Comment

              • Joe R.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • February 28, 2002
                • 1356

                #8
                Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

                Originally posted by Daniel Stairiker (63817)
                Hi,

                I just installed the driveshaft in my 1960 after having my Borg Warner rebuilt. The actual yoke shaft exposure is 2 inches showing - is that correct. I have the 4 and 3/4 inch yoke which is supposed to be correct. Also does anyone have the drive shaft length - I bought this car in pieces - no engine or transmission and was wondering if it is the right driveshaft?.

                Thanks

                Dan
                Last year I did some internet research on this topic (recommended amount of yoke shaft free play), and the consensus was that 3/4" to 1" is recommended for solid axle cars where movement of the rear suspension causes the yoke to move in and out of the transmission.

                Note that the key factor is free play, the distance that the yoke has available to move in and out. This is not the same as yoke exposure, because the maximum travel distance of the yoke into the transmission might be limited by the length of the transmission output shaft rather than the yoke itself.

                Even if your yoke has 2" of free play, I don't think that's a disaster. You can still drive the car that way, even if it is not optimal. Take your time to figure out whether your driveshaft is the stock length.

                Comment

                • David B.
                  Very Frequent User
                  • February 29, 1980
                  • 686

                  #9
                  Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

                  The correct yolk for all 55-62 Corv. (8 cyl) is PN 3712379 Grp. 5.555. It measures 6.17 from end to center opening. The finished surface is 4.93 long. As previously mentioned the driveshaft is 34 35/64 long. It is a type F. Parts books show it measured from end to end.

                  Comment

                  • Daniel S.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • July 25, 2017
                    • 117

                    #10
                    Re: 1960 - Transmission yoke shaft exposure

                    Originally posted by Joe Randolph (37610)
                    Last year I did some internet research on this topic (recommended amount of yoke shaft free play), and the consensus was that 3/4" to 1" is recommended for solid axle cars where movement of the rear suspension causes the yoke to move in and out of the transmission.

                    Note that the key factor is free play, the distance that the yoke has available to move in and out. This is not the same as yoke exposure, because the maximum travel distance of the yoke into the transmission might be limited by the length of the transmission output shaft rather than the yoke itself.

                    Even if your yoke has 2" of free play, I don't think that's a disaster. You can still drive the car that way, even if it is not optimal. Take your time to figure out whether your driveshaft is the stock length.
                    Hi Joe,
                    I measured the drive shaft and apparently it is the right length - I went and measured the free play again and it is about 1 3/4 inch . I am with you that it should be ok I should have at least minimum of 2 inches where the yoke overlaps the transmission shaft.

                    thanks for the info.

                    Dan

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    Searching...Please wait.
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                    There are no results that meet this criteria.
                    Search Result for "|||"