1970 Muncie date code question - NCRS Discussion Boards

1970 Muncie date code question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David L.
    Expired
    • July 31, 1980
    • 3310

    1970 Muncie date code question

    I have a Muncie 4-speed M21 transmission with a 1970 Corvette V.I.N. that I bought at a swap meet in Thompson, CT back in the 1990's. I bought the transmission for my 1970 Camaro SS350 project that has since been abandoned. The stamping on the main housing is "P0T30B" (Muncie, 1970 model year, December, 30th, M21) which makes the assembly date as December 30, 1969. The casting numbers on the housing are "3925661", "9", and "12". Does the large "12" represent December and the "9" represent the year 1969?
    Dave

  • Mark F.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • July 31, 1998
    • 1458

    #2
    Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

    Originally posted by David Liukkonen (3775)
    I have a Muncie 4-speed M21 transmission with a 1970 Corvette V.I.N. that I bought at a swap meet in Thompson, CT back in the 1990's. I bought the transmission for my 1970 Camaro SS350 project that has since been abandoned. The stamping on the main housing is "P0T30B" (Muncie, 1970 model year, December, 30th, M21) which makes the assembly date as December 30, 1969. The casting numbers on the housing are "3925661", "9", and "12". Does the large "12" represent December and the "9" represent the year 1969? Dave
    Hi Dave,

    I'm pretty sure the "9" is the casting mold number (not a year code).
    not sure what the 12 is (and notice the "1" is larger font than the "2")...
    thx,
    Mark

    Comment

    • Bill B.
      Very Frequent User
      • August 1, 2016
      • 303

      #3
      Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

      Dave,

      The marking are somewhat confusing to me. The "70S407318" appears to be the VIN from a 1970 Corvette manufactured in March of 1970. The "P0?30B? is strange, where the "?" is expected to be a letter "A" thru "G" for the 1970 Corvette model year. It looks more like a "T" or "F", but if an "F", that wouldn't normally fall in the expected production range (F = June), according to my information. The "30" refers to the day of the month. The 3925661 main case casting code of 3925661 does refer to transmissions of 1970 - 1974 vintage.

      Perhaps others may offer better info on this one.
      Bill Bertelli
      Northeast and Carolinas Chapters Member
      '70 Resto Mod LT-1 w/ partial '70 ZR-1 drivetrain

      Comment

      • Bill B.
        Very Frequent User
        • August 1, 2016
        • 303

        #4
        Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

        Unless I'm wrong, according to a "P0T30B" stamping, the transmission was supposedly manufactured December 30, 1970, which would make it destined to go into a model year 1971 vehicle. I do not believe the "0" was a model year designation, but rather manufacturing year designation, unless someone at the plant started changing the gang stamp incorrectly, and then the transmission was "lost in the system" for a while before being installed in that March '70 Corvette ...

        (edit - Late breaking info - According to an article by Paul Cangialosi, Muncie transmissions with a December build date were marked with a next year ident, for some reason. To quote: One important point is that if you have a Muncie dated with a December build date it was actually built the prior year. An example would be the date code P8T13. This is for a 1968 production car. The T stands for December and 13 is the day.
        So ... with this info, it does make sense and a 2 to 3 month delay from build to vehicle installation does not appear to be out of the ordinary. Also, without knowing the first 4 digits of the VIN known, it might not even be a Corvette partial VIN, but it WAS definitely a St. Louis build vehicle. (Most likely was a Corvette)
        Last edited by Bill B.; July 27, 2022, 04:41 PM. Reason: additional late breaking news ...
        Bill Bertelli
        Northeast and Carolinas Chapters Member
        '70 Resto Mod LT-1 w/ partial '70 ZR-1 drivetrain

        Comment

        • Patrick B.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • August 31, 1985
          • 1985

          #5
          Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

          The digit after the P refers to the model year not the calendar year. Your trans was made in December 1969 for the 1970 model yeay.

          Comment

          • Bill B.
            Very Frequent User
            • August 1, 2016
            • 303

            #6
            Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

            Patrick, thanks for the correction and to Jack Morocco for catching an important typo.

            Further investigation on this provided some additional detail:

            During the 1963 thru 1966 Muncie build period, there was no year info provided. The second and third digits after the "P" represented the month it was assembled and the 4th & 5th digit the day

            Apparently starting around the 1967 model year, they started using a single second digit that represented the model year, not the actual year it was assembled, with the 3rd letter representing the month and the 4th & 5th digits representing the day.

            The letter suffix (A, B, C) was added starting 1969 to indicate M20, M21 or M22.

            Thanks again Patrick & Jack!
            Last edited by Bill B.; July 30, 2022, 12:12 PM. Reason: corrected typos and mistakes (I'm getting old!)
            Bill Bertelli
            Northeast and Carolinas Chapters Member
            '70 Resto Mod LT-1 w/ partial '70 ZR-1 drivetrain

            Comment

            • Tom P.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • March 31, 1980
              • 1814

              #7
              Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

              This is the correct answer.

              Comment

              • David L.
                Expired
                • July 31, 1980
                • 3310

                #8
                Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

                Originally posted by Tom Parsons (3491)
                This is the correct answer.
                Tom,
                What exactly "is the correct answer"?

                The stamping on the main housing is "P0T30B" (Muncie, 1970 model year, December, 30th, M21) which makes the assembly date as December 30, 1969. The casting number on the housing are "3925661". There is no question in my mind that the transmission has a 1970 Corvette partial V.I.N........"70S407318"......where the number "0" is the model year 1970 and the letter "S" is for St. Louis where Corvettes were assembled for many years.

                Here is my question once again:
                Does the large "12" casting number represent December and does the "9" casting number represent the year 1969 on the main housing? I have never seen numbers like this on a Muncie.......but I have not seen every Muncie transmission that was ever built either.

                Dave

                Comment

                • Tom P.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • March 31, 1980
                  • 1814

                  #9
                  Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

                  Originally posted by Patrick Boyd (9110)
                  The digit after the P refers to the model year not the calendar year. Your trans was made in December 1969 for the 1970 model yeay.
                  I failed to quote the above reply, which is correct information.
                  The 9 and 12 in circles, such as on various cast alum parts has been discussed and debated for many years without a definitive conclusion. But as explained above, the P0T30B is valid for Muncie, 1970, Dec 8, M21. Thus, assembled in Dec 69 for installation in a 70 model.

                  Comment

                  • David B.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • February 29, 1980
                    • 686

                    #10
                    Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

                    Looking at earlier Muncie case prints indicates the 9 and l2 are die status & date markers which must appear in that area. The 9 being the status marker. Earlier cases with a circle had the month at top and week below (date marker). In this case I would guess 1 is January and 2 is the second week. Are you sure Stamp #s are not P0130B? Therefore January 30th. ??

                    Comment

                    • Patrick B.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • August 31, 1985
                      • 1985

                      #11
                      Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

                      Originally posted by David Bartush (3288)
                      Looking at earlier Muncie case prints indicates the 9 and l2 are die status & date markers which must appear in that area. The 9 being the status marker. Earlier cases with a circle had the month at top and week below (date marker). In this case I would guess 1 is January and 2 is the second week. Are you sure Stamp #s are not P0130B? Therefore January 30th. ??

                      Comment

                      • Tom P.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • March 31, 1980
                        • 1814

                        #12
                        Re: 1970 Muncie date code question

                        Originally posted by David Bartush (3288)
                        Looking at earlier Muncie case prints indicates the 9 and l2 are die status & date markers which must appear in that area. The 9 being the status marker. Earlier cases with a circle had the month at top and week below (date marker). In this case I would guess 1 is January and 2 is the second week. Are you sure Stamp #s are not P0130B? Therefore January 30th. ??
                        The letter for the Month on Muncie main cases did not follow the same format as it did on other GM castings, such as blocks, heads, etc.
                        I was A-Jan, B-Feb C-Mar, D-Apr, E-May, H-Jun, K-Jul, M-Aug, P-Sep, R-Oct, S-Nov, T-Dec .
                        I don't know why it was different on Muncie cases, you will have to ask GM why it was different (good luck).

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        Searching...Please wait.
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                        Search Result for "|||"