C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump - NCRS Discussion Boards

C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve F.
    Expired
    • December 9, 2020
    • 38

    C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

    Im going to need a waterpump soon. So my journey starts here to find the proper innards.

    We know that these castings are what was used for the 65 327 engines.
    3782608 - 250 & 300Hp engines
    3859326 - 350,365, & 375Hp engines

    But are the 65 SHP pump impellers different from the base models?

    Steve
  • Larry M.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • January 1, 1992
    • 2688

    #2
    Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

    No.

    Larry

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43211

      #3
      Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

      Originally posted by Steve Finigian (67536)
      Im going to need a waterpump soon. So my journey starts here to find the proper innards.

      We know that these castings are what was used for the 65 327 engines.
      3782608 - 250 & 300Hp engines
      3859326 - 350,365, & 375Hp engines

      But are the 65 SHP pump impellers different from the base models?

      Steve

      Steve------


      The only functional difference between 250/300 HP and SHP small block waterpumps for the 1963-67 period was the pump body casting. The 250/300 HP has no upper boss for external bypass whereas the SHP pumps have an upper boss for external bypass. The impellers, bearing/shaft assembly, seals, rear plate and hubs are the same.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Duke W.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 1, 1993
        • 15661

        #4
        Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

        Wasn't the hub that the pulley attaches to pressed on to a slightly different position on the shaft due to the dual belt arrangement on mechanical lifter engines?

        Duke

        Comment

        • Larry M.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • January 1, 1992
          • 2688

          #5
          Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

          Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
          Wasn't the hub that the pulley attaches to pressed on to a slightly different position on the shaft due to the dual belt arrangement on mechanical lifter engines?

          Duke
          As far as I know, it was only different for those small block cars with factory AC and Power Steering (in 67 model year).

          Larry

          Comment

          • Larry E.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • December 1, 1989
            • 1673

            #6
            Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

            Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
            Wasn't the hub that the pulley attaches to pressed on to a slightly different position on the shaft due to the dual belt arrangement on mechanical lifter engines?

            Duke
            Since I have switched several of my vehicles to use the "captured" belt for safety/reliability and have never had to adjust the
            the hub on the pump itself; I believe the pulley(the way it is made) itself does all the adjustment for use of two belts. Picture below
            is a LS9 for my pick-up. All I did was to install LT-1 pulleys and went right in using the same water pump/hub setup. JMHO>Larry
            Attached Files
            Larry

            LT1 in a 1LE -- One of 134

            Comment

            • Steve F.
              Expired
              • December 9, 2020
              • 38

              #7
              Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

              Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
              Steve------
              The only functional difference between 250/300 HP and SHP small block waterpumps for the 1963-67 period was the pump body casting. The 250/300 HP has no upper boss for external bypass whereas the SHP pumps have an upper boss for external bypass. The impellers, bearing/shaft assembly, seals, rear plate and hubs are the same.
              Joe, Thanks for the confirmation. I did do some salvaging and concluded the same.

              Comment

              • Chris D.
                Very Frequent User
                • November 1, 2002
                • 198

                #8
                Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

                Steve,

                While the internal components are identical, the hubs are indeed set to different dimensions on the shaft. '63 shop manual specifies tool J-9608 as the fixture to set this dimension except for F.I. engines which are to use J-9648. Different tools, different dimensions.

                Chris Davies

                Comment

                • Alan D.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • January 1, 2005
                  • 2038

                  #9
                  Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

                  The 3859326 has a drawing date of 5-18-65 so assure you're in the 6 month time frame

                  Comment

                  • Joe R.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • March 1, 2002
                    • 1356

                    #10
                    Re: C2 SHP Small Block Waterpump

                    Originally posted by Larry Mulder (20401)
                    As far as I know, it was only different for those small block cars with factory AC and Power Steering (in 67 model year).

                    Larry
                    To clarify the situation with the water pump flange placement, there were two types of pulleys used on C2 small blocks:

                    1) "Standard groove" pulleys used primarily on base engines
                    2) "Deep groove" pulleys used primarily on the high-hp SHP engines

                    The deep groove pulley sets required setting the pulley flange 1/8" farther out (toward the radiator) to line up with the corresponding deep groove pulley on the balancer.

                    The face of the balancer is in the same position on all C2 small blocks, so the face of the balancer is "ground zero" for pulley alignment. The center lines of the deep groove pulleys are 1/8" farther apart compared to the centerlines of the standard-groove pulleys, so the hub on the water pump has to be 1/8" farther out than the hub for the standard-groove pump.

                    What makes this confusing is that when a '66-'67 C2 small block SHP engines had BOTH air conditioning and power steering, GM used the standard-groove pulley set. So, these SHP engines (and only these SHP engines) had the standard-groove pulley set and the base engine placement for the water pump flange.

                    If you have alignment problems with your pulleys, it is usually because your water pump flange is in the wrong location and/or you have a mix of standard-groove and deep-groove pulleys. After a considerable amount of work, I think we have the pulley tables correct in the 7th edition of the 1967 JG.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    Searching...Please wait.
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                    There are no results that meet this criteria.
                    Search Result for "|||"