-65 shielding

[Michael G.]

I'm trying to figure out a scribble on a judging sheet that I didn't ask about at judging a couple of years ago. It refers to the shielding on my '65 saying what seems to be:

"STD (scribble) NON-Magnetic"

I have no clue what this refers to, but am guessing something in my shielding system is supposed to be magnetic, but isn't.

Any '65 judges out there to help decipher?

Thanks,

[Peter H.]

Re: -65 shielding

Hi Michael. There Should Be Two Names On Your Mechanical Judging Section. Your Could Drop Them A PM Asking For An Explanation
Hopefully There Signatures Are Legible. Good Luck. Peter 🇨🇦

[David H.]

Re: -65 shielding

I'm trying to figure out a scribble on a judging sheet that I didn't ask about at judging a couple of years ago. It refers to the shielding on my '65 saying what seems to be:

"STD (scribble) NON-Magnetic"

I have no clue what this refers to, but am guessing something in my shielding system is supposed to be magnetic, but isn't.

Any '65 judges out there to help decipher?

Thanks,

Michael

Curious, what, if any, Originality deduction was made?

"STD" would refer to Standard Deduction Guidelines" - again curious, can you decipher what number was used?

Dave

[Michael G.]

Re: -65 shielding

David,

It was three points, plus 1 condition, but included a couple of other minor problems with the shielding, so I don't know what applied to what. I don't have any complaints, the distributor shield was a repro. I've got an original now.

I've asked the judge involved what the deduction meant. I think he must've explained it back then, but I don't recall, so, if he doesn't mind helping, maybe I'll know soon.

[Michael G.]

[Ronald L.]

Re: -65 shielding

Non magnetic is for sure a stainless grade that won't hold a magnet, and for that particular part is NTFP, not typical factory Production, i.e. cheaper repro.

[Michael G.]