65 pulleys - NCRS Discussion Boards

65 pulleys

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ed P.
    Very Frequent User
    • July 31, 2002
    • 270

    65 pulleys

    65 250hp with power steering. I have crank pulley 3744043 and add on pulley 3751232. They do not fit together correctly. I think I need 3850838 instead of 3744043. Can anyone confirm. Thanks Ed
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43219

    #2
    Re: 65 pulleys

    Originally posted by Ed Pearce (38494)
    65 250hp with power steering. I have crank pulley 3744043 and add on pulley 3751232. They do not fit together correctly. I think I need 3850838 instead of 3744043. Can anyone confirm. Thanks Ed

    Ed------



    I do not understand why the 3744043 and 3751232 do not fit together. The 3751232 should "nest" in the 3744043. You will note that the 3744043 has two raised, circular extensions. These should mate with holes on the 3751232.

    The 3850838 has the same extensions and will also mate with the 3751232. However, I don't think it was the pulley originally used for your application.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Ed P.
      Very Frequent User
      • July 31, 2002
      • 270

      #3
      Re: 65 pulleys

      Looks like previous owner may have tried to bolt pulley on misaligned. They dimpled the bolt holes. I straighten out holes and fit looks better. Curios should there be a gap between the crank pulley and the add on pulley at the v belt slot outside diameter. I have none.

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • February 1, 1988
        • 43219

        #4
        Re: 65 pulleys

        Originally posted by Ed Pearce (38494)
        Looks like previous owner may have tried to bolt pulley on misaligned. They dimpled the bolt holes. I straighten out holes and fit looks better. Curios should there be a gap between the crank pulley and the add on pulley at the v belt slot outside diameter. I have none.

        Ed------


        No gap as I recall. However, the rear of the 3751232 needs to be in complete contact with the mating surface of the 3744043. If you can see no gap between the pulleys at any point of their circumference the chances are good that you have it right.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        Working...
        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"