55-62 Differential Pinion Seal - Which is correct? - NCRS Discussion Boards

55-62 Differential Pinion Seal - Which is correct?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bob B.
    Very Frequent User
    • February 28, 2003
    • 831

    55-62 Differential Pinion Seal - Which is correct?

    Hi all,

    First time I've needed to replace a pinion seal on a C1 differential. The replacements offered by more than one source do not match what came off. The replacement (l) is just a stamped cup with a rubber seal in the middle, whereas the original (r) has a raised stamped area and the seal is rubber with tiny springs encircling to provide pressure for better sealing.

    Moreover, the second pic shows where the old seal came off shows and you can see how the raised metal area has polished the part of the face of the bearing, which seems to be there to help hold the bearing??

    So I'm just not seeing how the replacement can be correct. If not, anyone know of a source for the one that came off?

    Thanks,

    Bob
    Attached Files
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 31, 1988
    • 43193

    #2
    Re: 55-62 Differential Pinion Seal - Which is correct?

    Originally posted by Bob Baird (39424)
    Hi all,

    First time I've needed to replace a pinion seal on a C1 differential. The replacements offered by more than one source do not match what came off. The replacement (l) is just a stamped cup with a rubber seal in the middle, whereas the original (r) has a raised stamped area and the seal is rubber with tiny springs encircling to provide pressure for better sealing.

    Moreover, the second pic shows where the old seal came off shows and you can see how the raised metal area has polished the part of the face of the bearing, which seems to be there to help hold the bearing??

    So I'm just not seeing how the replacement can be correct. If not, anyone know of a source for the one that came off?

    Thanks,

    Bob

    Bob-------


    The new seal is the design that replaced the original seal design MANY years ago. I believe that all of the major seal manufacturers use this design now. If there are exceptions I don't know of them. The current design works well, though.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Richard G.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • July 31, 1984
      • 1715

      #3
      Re: 55-62 Differential Pinion Seal - Which is correct?

      Seals are never designed to help retrain the bearing.
      The pinion nut transfers the axial forces along with the crush sleeve. The bearing's interference fit supports the radial force.

      The polished are of the inner race is from the yolk pressing on the bearing. The seal never touches this area, if we are referencing the same spot.
      It appears to me the bearing has possibility been rotating on the shaft. I would lightly tap the end with a small rubber hammer to see if it moves in the axial direction. If it does the bearing fit is out of specification.

      I have never heard of a judge deducting points for the seal type.
      However, I believe am sure their would be deductions if it leaked.
      Rick

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 31, 1988
        • 43193

        #4
        Re: 55-62 Differential Pinion Seal - Which is correct?

        Originally posted by Bob Baird (39424)
        Hi all,

        First time I've needed to replace a pinion seal on a C1 differential. The replacements offered by more than one source do not match what came off. The replacement (l) is just a stamped cup with a rubber seal in the middle, whereas the original (r) has a raised stamped area and the seal is rubber with tiny springs encircling to provide pressure for better sealing.

        Moreover, the second pic shows where the old seal came off shows and you can see how the raised metal area has polished the part of the face of the bearing, which seems to be there to help hold the bearing??

        So I'm just not seeing how the replacement can be correct. If not, anyone know of a source for the one that came off?

        Thanks,

        Bob

        Bob------


        I should also have mentioned, the new seal you picture, while of the newer bonded design, is a rather "el-cheapo". The better bonded seals still have a small, circumferential spring which increases tension. So, if it were me, I'd use a name brand seal. For example, the Timken 6818 is such a seal for your application.

        If you want a totally original configuration seal, you could look for an NOS GM #3776800 or GM #3865358. I don't really think you need to, though.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        Working...
        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"