1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences - NCRS Discussion Boards

1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Matthew L.
    Very Frequent User
    • August 29, 2010
    • 187

    1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

    Has anyone seen other 1971 March assembly date stamps that have 2 different style 3 characters.
    Attached Files
  • Edward J.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • September 15, 2008
    • 6940

    #2
    Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

    Matt, its very common to see different letter and number stamps.
    New England chapter member, 63 Convert. 327/340- Chapter/Regional/national Top Flight, 72 coupe- chapter and regional Top Flight.

    Comment

    • Dick W.
      Former NCRS Director Region IV
      • June 30, 1985
      • 10483

      #3
      Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

      Don't think I would have a problem with the characters on the judging field.
      Dick Whittington

      Comment

      • Don H.
        Moderator
        • June 16, 2009
        • 2235

        #4
        Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

        How about the two very different 0 s? John Hinckley would be a good one to address this question.

        Comment

        • Michael H.
          Very Frequent User
          • November 30, 1987
          • 724

          #5
          Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

          Look good to me. Like the broach marks.

          Mike

          Comment

          • Bill M.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • July 31, 1989
            • 1316

            #6
            Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

            Would like to see what an 8 looks like. The second 3 looks like an incomplete 8.

            Comment

            • Edward M.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • October 31, 1985
              • 1916

              #7
              Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

              I have seen this many times, and on many engines besides Corvette engines. I would not have an issue with it.

              Comment

              • Dick W.
                Former NCRS Director Region IV
                • June 30, 1985
                • 10483

                #8
                Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

                Originally posted by Don Hooper (50543)
                How about the two very different 0 s? John Hinckley would be a good one to address this question.
                Very common occurrence
                Dick Whittington

                Comment

                • Jack M.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • March 1, 1991
                  • 1133

                  #9
                  Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

                  Here's a 'mirrored' sample of some potential stamp pad characters (from JohnZ)...
                  I also lined up a few similar characters on the pad in question.



                  Attached Files

                  Comment

                  • Don H.
                    Moderator
                    • June 16, 2009
                    • 2235

                    #10
                    Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

                    Originally posted by Dick Whittington (8804)
                    Very common occurrence
                    I too have seen different 0s many times, just not that square 0. But I see it in the stamp holder. And the 3. Thanks Jack.
                    It looks like the guy who filled the gang that day was having some fun with oddball stamps.

                    Comment

                    • Matthew L.
                      Very Frequent User
                      • August 29, 2010
                      • 187

                      #11
                      Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

                      Thanks you for all the responses.

                      Comment

                      • Tim G.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • February 28, 1990
                        • 1358

                        #12
                        Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

                        Good work, Jack. I like how you reconstructed the stamp.

                        Comment

                        • Richard F.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • September 30, 1981
                          • 498

                          #13
                          Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

                          Jack, excellent contribution, well done!

                          Rich

                          Comment

                          • Jack M.
                            Extremely Frequent Poster
                            • March 1, 1991
                            • 1133

                            #14
                            Re: 1971 LT1 stamp pad character differences

                            THANX for your kind words... I'm just an idiot with an old version of Photoshop, allowing me to recreate the pad stamp.
                            As mentioned previously, the gang holder photo credit goes to John Hinckley (JohnZ).
                            On CorvetteForum, he also posted this additional info:

                            That's my photo of a utilityman's stamp setup block on Line #2 at Flint V-8, and it shows exactly what this thread is all about. The engine plants bought their gang stamp holders from the George T. Schmidt Co. in Chicago (or made them in their toolroom), and bought the individual stamping dies from five different stamp die vendors, depending on price and delivery (there were slight differences in similar fonts across the different stamp die vendors, and no attempt was made to commonize the font appearance where the same character was used more than once in a given stamp). The VIN derivative was stamped at the car assembly plant, and those individual stamping dies were one size smaller than the ones used at the engine plants for the plant, date, and suffix.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            Searching...Please wait.
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                            There are no results that meet this criteria.
                            Search Result for "|||"