1966 carpet judging - NCRS Discussion Boards

1966 carpet judging

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jerry C.
    Very Frequent User
    • October 31, 1995
    • 741

    1966 carpet judging

    Customer bought ACC black carpet and wondered how it would judge compared to Al Knoch? Thanks in advance.
  • Donald H.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • November 1, 2009
    • 2580

    #2
    Re: 1966 carpet judging

    I lost 3 points on my 66 coupe at the Altoona Regional. Mine was Al Knoch, but I suspect ACC will probable get the same deduct. I've been told by folks who know that none of the current carpets will get by with no deduct.
    Don Harris
    Current: 67 convertible Marina Blue L79
    Former: 60 Red/Red, 2x4, 245hp (Regional and National Top Flight 2013), 66 coupe Nassau Blue, L79 (Chapter and Regional Top Flight 2017)

    Comment

    • Gary B.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • January 31, 1997
      • 6979

      #3
      Re: 1966 carpet judging

      Several owners who have taken their '66s thru the judging process have told me for years now that there is no correct repro carpet. But those of us needing black are at least lucky to have the color more or less correct with a repro carpet.

      Gary

      Comment

      • Dan T.
        Expired
        • February 28, 1979
        • 42

        #4
        Re: 1966 carpet judging

        I lost 3 points at the Arizona Regional in 2018 as well. The judges stated the "Loop too large, not typical production." Along with the heel pad and switch grommet were not typical production as well. Good luck on that one.

        Comment

        • Jaime G.
          Very Frequent User
          • March 31, 1988
          • 480

          #5
          Re: 1966 carpet judging

          Originally posted by Dan Termeer (2325)
          I lost 3 points at the Arizona Regional in 2018 as well. The judges stated the "Loop too large, not typical production." Along with the heel pad and switch grommet were not typical production as well. Good luck on that one.
          These are standard deductions for reproduction carpet. As stated before, no currently manufactured carpet is 100% correct hence the deduction.
          No big deal in the overall scheme of things for interiors.

          Comment

          • Gary B.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • January 31, 1997
            • 6979

            #6
            Re: 1966 carpet judging

            Jaime,

            Is a standard deduction table for carpet something new? In my edition of the Judging Reference Manual, there is no standard deduction for carpet, like there is for glass, tires, batteries, headlamps, exhaust, etc.

            Gary

            Comment

            • Jaime G.
              Very Frequent User
              • March 31, 1988
              • 480

              #7
              Re: 1966 carpet judging

              Originally posted by Gary Beaupre (28818)
              Jaime,

              Is a standard deduction table for carpet something new? In my edition of the Judging Reference Manual, there is no standard deduction for carpet, like there is for glass, tires, batteries, headlamps, exhaust, etc.

              Gary
              Gary, I mispoke. There is no standard deduction in the Judging Manual, however for as long as I have been judging interiors, most installations
              involving reproduction carpet get a 3 point deduction if installed correctly.

              Comment

              • Gary B.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • January 31, 1997
                • 6979

                #8
                Re: 1966 carpet judging

                Jaime,

                Thanks. It's good to know what I can expect when I get my car judged with its repro carpets.

                Gary

                Comment

                Working...
                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"