087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor - NCRS Discussion Boards

087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kent S.
    Very Frequent User
    • January 31, 1993
    • 203

    087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

    I've read several posts on the subject of coil/resistors and understand that there was a change mid-63. I have an 087 coil and the black dot .3 resistor. Will these work together without causing burned points and/or performance issues? Thanks in advance for your advice.
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • December 31, 1992
    • 15611

    #2
    Re: 087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

    All early '63 engines utilized the 0.3 ohm ballast mated with the 091 coil. When the 1.8 ohm ballast was implemented with the 250/300 HP engines, it was mated with the 087 coil. I don't know the differences in resistance values. I recall the '63 Corvette Shop manual lists values for the 091.

    I can't say how the 0.3 ohm ballast with the 087 coil will perform other than the 0.3 ohm ballast with any coil will increase the change of burned points due to the higher primary current.

    It happened to my 340 HP SWC back in the sixties. I would suggest using the point set with the larger contact surface... don't remember the NAPA number, but I wrote an article about it that was published in The Corvette Restorer. You can probably find it with a Web search and I know it's posted on the Corvette Forum in a thread started by me.

    Duke

    Comment

    • Kent S.
      Very Frequent User
      • January 31, 1993
      • 203

      #3
      Re: 087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

      Appreciate the help, Duke.

      Comment

      • Dick W.
        Former NCRS Director Region IV
        • June 30, 1985
        • 10483

        #4
        Re: 087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

        Napa ECH CS 786
        Dick Whittington

        Comment

        • Kent S.
          Very Frequent User
          • January 31, 1993
          • 203

          #5
          Re: 087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

          Originally posted by Dick Whittington (8804)
          Napa ECH CS 786
          Good to know - thanks.

          Comment

          • John D.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • November 30, 1979
            • 5507

            #6
            Re: 087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

            Scroll down the bottom of the page or do an advance search of this subject. We have covered it over the years. I just read a post by Dale Pearman from 2000.
            Basically a 087 coil uses a D1110 Ballast resistor.
            The '091 uses a D1111 BR. The 62 dated '63 shop manual ( only one printed) states '091 BR: 1.4-1.62 Resistance-ohms.
            No mention of a '087 coil or the D1110 BR that was used later in some applications.
            I remember when my '63 FI car was first restored I had the wrong coil on it. I had a '087 coil with a D1111-the real deal with the cut off rounded end. I was told I was going to fry my points.
            What is the ohms resistance of the D1110 BR.. I had the info but lost it. Thanks. John

            Comment

            • Frank D.
              Expired
              • December 26, 2007
              • 2703

              #7
              Re: 087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

              Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
              All early '63 engines utilized the 0.3 ohm ballast mated with the 091 coil. When the 1.8 ohm ballast was implemented with the 250/300 HP engines, it was mated with the 087 coil. I don't know the differences in resistance values. I recall the '63 Corvette Shop manual lists values for the 091.

              I can't say how the 0.3 ohm ballast with the 087 coil will perform other than the 0.3 ohm ballast with any coil will increase the change of burned points due to the higher primary current.

              It happened to my 340 HP SWC back in the sixties. I would suggest using the point set with the larger contact surface... don't remember the NAPA number, but I wrote an article about it that was published in The Corvette Restorer. You can probably find it with a Web search and I know it's posted on the Corvette Forum in a thread started by me.

              Duke
              Isn't there a TSB in the back of the 63/64 JG concerning this changeover ? Or am I mistaken ?

              Comment

              • Duke W.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • December 31, 1992
                • 15611

                #8
                Re: 087 Coil with .3 Ballast resistor

                A TSB was written by Chevrolet on the subject. I presented a photo copy to the powers that be back in 2001, but don't know if the bulletin or the requisite info is in the current version of the 63-64 JG.

                Perhaps someone who has a copy can check.

                Duke

                Comment

                Working...
                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"