CE Block - NCRS Discussion Boards

CE Block

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dan A.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • May 31, 1974
    • 1074

    #16
    Re: CE Block

    If you were to look into it further I think you are likely to find that the the last three digits of the block casting number are 512 rather than 870 if it is a small block car. The 512 casting cylinder case was only used to service replacements for the no longer produced 327 when the CE program began in 68 or 69.

    To confuse the issue there was also a big block casting number ending in 512 that was used in production somewhere around late '69 to transition from the 427 to the 454 for 1970. The 454 required more cylinder wall clearance.

    Comment

    • Jim T.
      Expired
      • March 1, 1993
      • 5351

      #17
      Re: CE Block

      My 1970 Corvette is a original owner bought new from the show room floor of a Chevrolet dealership.
      It has a CE engine short block because the original engine did not last 10 minutes driving from the dealership. I have over 150,000 miles on the replacement engine.

      Comment

      • Robert D.
        Expired
        • September 11, 2016
        • 8

        #18
        Re: CE Block

        So maybe having a CE block is not necessarily a bad thing.
        Thanks, Jim.

        Comment

        • Mark E.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • April 1, 1993
          • 4528

          #19
          Re: CE Block

          Originally posted by Larry Evoskis (16324)
          Just a guess and JMHO>Small Blocks 65%---Big Blocks 35%>Comments? Larry
          This would be an interesting factoid to know, if it was knowable.

          Judging from eBay cars for sale, it seems virtually 100% have their OM.
          Mark Edmondson
          Dallas, Texas
          Texas Chapter

          1970 Coupe, Donnybrooke Green, Light Saddle LS5 M20 A31 C60 G81 N37 N40 UA6 U79
          1993 Coupe, 40th Anniversary, 6-speed, PEG 1, FX3, CD, Bronze Top

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43211

            #20
            Re: CE Block

            Originally posted by Robert Dilliplane (62787)
            So maybe having a CE block is not necessarily a bad thing.
            Thanks, Jim.
            Robert------

            It's not as good as having an original engine. But, it's way better than having a Pontiac engine.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Wayne H.
              Expired
              • August 19, 2018
              • 58

              #21
              Re: CE Block

              Originally posted by Larry Evoskis (16324)
              Just a guess and JMHO>Small Blocks 65%---Big Blocks 35%>Comments? Larry
              I would guess less than that.

              Comment

              • Domenic T.
                Expired
                • January 29, 2010
                • 2452

                #22
                Re: CE Block

                I have a CE big block in my 67. I don't have the #s in front of me but the casting # said it was a late 67 early 68 block. I will have to get the #s off
                the pad and date off the engine.

                Dom

                Comment

                • Domenic T.
                  Expired
                  • January 29, 2010
                  • 2452

                  #23
                  Re: CE Block

                  Originally posted by Domenic Tallarita (51287)
                  I have a CE big block in my 67. I don't have the #s in front of me but the casting # said it was a late 67 early 68 block. I will have to get the #s off
                  the pad and date off the engine.

                  Dom
                  Robert,
                  I would like the guys that posted a answer as the group here on your thread to see what they think as this block had CE on it in 67, but obvious for a early 68.
                  My CE Big Block is 3916321 which says late 67 early 68. H 15 7 = August 15, 1967. From what I can read on the pad
                  is is CE 51463. Doesn't make sense.

                  Dom

                  Comment

                  • Terry M.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • September 30, 1980
                    • 15595

                    #24
                    Re: CE Block

                    Originally posted by Domenic Tallarita (51287)
                    Robert,
                    I would like the guys that posted a answer as the group here on your thread to see what they think as this block had CE on it in 67, but obvious for a early 68.
                    My CE Big Block is 3916321 which says late 67 early 68. H 15 7 = August 15, 1967. From what I can read on the pad
                    is is CE 51463. Doesn't make sense.

                    Dom
                    Dom
                    Actually it does make sense if you know what blocks of numbers were assigned to which engine plant. We placed the Chevrolet Information Bulletins with those numbers in the chrome bumper C3 TIM&JG in the earlier editions, but we have been told we are no longer to include those as new editions are produced.
                    Terry

                    Comment

                    • Joe L.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • February 1, 1988
                      • 43211

                      #25
                      Re: CE Block

                      Originally posted by Terry McManmon (3966)
                      Dom
                      Actually it does make sense if you know what blocks of numbers were assigned to which engine plant. We placed the Chevrolet Information Bulletins with those numbers in the chrome bumper C3 TIM&JG in the earlier editions, but we have been told we are no longer to include those as new editions are produced.
                      Terry------


                      That information can be found in post #6, above.
                      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                      Comment

                      • Terry M.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • September 30, 1980
                        • 15595

                        #26
                        Re: CE Block

                        Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
                        Terry------


                        That information can be found in post #6, above.
                        So it is. Mystery solved.
                        Terry

                        Comment

                        • Domenic T.
                          Expired
                          • January 29, 2010
                          • 2452

                          #27
                          Re: CE Block

                          Thanks for post #6. I am missing a number on my pad. I will have to look harder as it should be a 7 or possibly a 8 following the CE. CE ?51743

                          Dom

                          Comment

                          • Darryl D.
                            Very Frequent User
                            • February 7, 2017
                            • 386

                            #28
                            Re: CE Block

                            Originally posted by Robert Dilliplane (62787)
                            Thank you, Robert! Very helpful. It almost sounds like this could have been an honest exchange by GM. What are the thoughts out there about a car's value if it has a CE block?

                            Robert
                            Since you are asking these questions on the NCRS forum I am assuming you are looking for the best block for your car for judging/value. Most CE blocks have the wrong casting number and date to be anywhere close to being correct for your car. Judging allows for the least number of points lost when the original engine is gone, with a date code correct engine with the correct casting number block built in the right plant for your car and the time your car was built.

                            Comment

                            • Cecil L.
                              Very Frequent User
                              • May 31, 1980
                              • 449

                              #29
                              Re: CE Block

                              The program actually began before 68 with the CE numbers being stamped on the warranty and service replacements using the current production blocks before they stopped using 327's in production. After the small journal 327 was out of production they cast the special retrofit replacement blocks :
                              2959512 car and truck 327 both small journal and journal
                              3959532 car and truck 283 SJ
                              3950534 Chevy II 283
                              3959538 Chevy II 327

                              Most online sources mistakenly list these implying that they were used (cast) for 62-67 production but they were for service replacement application for out of production engines/blocks.

                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              • Jim T.
                                Expired
                                • March 1, 1993
                                • 5351

                                #30
                                Re: CE Block

                                REF my previous post above my CE engine has CEOA 47538 on the block front engine pad. The rear of the engine block on the drivers side has 3970010 and the right side rear of the block has D 26 0 stamping.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                Searching...Please wait.
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                Search Result for "|||"