Oil Pool in Top Recess on Intake Manifold - NCRS Discussion Boards

Oil Pool in Top Recess on Intake Manifold

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mark F.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • July 31, 1998
    • 1517

    #16
    Re: Oil Pool in Top Recess on Intake Manifold

    I've also had this problem almost the entire time I have owned my car (22 years) - '67 400HP (3894382 aluminum intake)
    I also thought it was carburetor-shaft-related, but after all three were rebuilt, a milder level of pooling/puddling returned even after carefully re-torquing in proper sequence...

    I guess now I have two questions:
    1. Is there any concern with loosening only one out of the 16 intake bolts (removing it; cleaning etc. as noted above) then re-torquing it back in place - adjacent to others that have been torqued for many years (20 yrs. in my case)? These puppies are notorious for cracked tabs and '67 400 intakes are a one-year-only part.

    2. If I re-check torque on the remaining 15 bolts, now that I've been made aware oil may be lubricating them from the underside, should I be concerned that I may over-torque them because some (maybe not all) of the bolts may still be dry; but others may be "lubed" and there's no way to tell which is which?

    I have no upcoming plans for re-judging my car and I do drive it (not as much as I'd like to), but I'd rather not have this puddle on my intake. I also don't want to risk cracking a tab for a mildly unsightly condition.

    DSCN6524.jpg
    Attached Files
    thx,
    Mark

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43209

      #17
      Re: Oil Pool in Top Recess on Intake Manifold

      Originally posted by Mark Francis (30800)
      I've also had this problem almost the entire time I have owned my car (22 years) - '67 400HP (3894382 aluminum intake)
      I also thought it was carburetor-shaft-related, but after all three were rebuilt, a milder level of pooling/puddling returned even after carefully re-torquing in proper sequence...

      I guess now I have two questions:
      1. Is there any concern with loosening only one out of the 16 intake bolts (removing it; cleaning etc. as noted above) then re-torquing it back in place - adjacent to others that have been torqued for many years (20 yrs. in my case)? These puppies are notorious for cracked tabs and '67 400 intakes are a one-year-only part.

      2. If I re-check torque on the remaining 15 bolts, now that I've been made aware oil may be lubricating them from the underside, should I be concerned that I may over-torque them because some (maybe not all) of the bolts may still be dry; but others may be "lubed" and there's no way to tell which is which?

      I have no upcoming plans for re-judging my car and I do drive it (not as much as I'd like to), but I'd rather not have this puddle on my intake. I also don't want to risk cracking a tab for a mildly unsightly condition.

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]100433[/ATTACH]

      Mark-------


      There is no problem, whatsoever, in removing a bolt, cleaning, applying sealer and re-torquing.

      It's not a bad idea to check the torque on all the manifold bolts using the torque sequence found in the SERVICE manual. The SERVICE manual spec for the bolts is 30 lb/ft. However, the PRODUCTION spec was 25-35 ft/lbs. So, if you torque the bolts to the SERVICE spec, you will have 5 ft/lbs of allowable "leeway". I don't think that any torque error due to lubricated bolts will exceed that. As a practical matter, I do not think that even if the error was 10 ft/lbs, which I doubt, there would be any problem.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Mark F.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • July 31, 1998
        • 1517

        #18
        Re: Oil Pool in Top Recess on Intake Manifold

        thanks much, Joe.

        My recollection is that I torqued them to 30 ft/lbs in multiple, gradual steps - and I definitely used the service manual sequence.

        So, as you point out, the +/- extra 5 ft/lbs makes me feel better about doing it.

        I do have a backup, original 382 intake - I just happen to like the one I have in the car now better...

        thx,
        Mark
        thx,
        Mark

        Comment

        Working...
        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"