63 360 HP fan clutch - NCRS Discussion Boards

63 360 HP fan clutch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Troy P.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • February 1, 1989
    • 1284

    63 360 HP fan clutch

    Which of these two are the correct fan clutch for my 63? In case neither is 100% correct which is the most correct, the newer looking one or the older appearing one I've been using?

    If you need more detailed photos to tell I'd be happy to provide them.

    Thanks in advance for sharing your judging expertise.

    Attached Files
  • Mike M.
    NCRS Past President
    • May 31, 1974
    • 8383

    #2
    Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

    the step in the shaft of the gold cad plated clutch makes it a service replacement. the uniform OD of the used clutch is similar, if not identical to that of an original 63 but go to the 65,66 0r 67 judging manual where the lengths of the shafts of a BBC vs SBC is discussed. i can't tell for sure from your photos but the used one appears to have the BBC length. mike

    Comment

    • Troy P.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • February 1, 1989
      • 1284

      #3
      Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

      Thanks Mike. I have the 63-64 judging guide but not the later one you suggest.

      The shaft length of the one I've been using is 1 3/8" and the flange is 3/16".

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • February 1, 1988
        • 43221

        #4
        Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

        Originally posted by Mike McCagh (14)
        the step in the shaft of the gold cad plated clutch makes it a service replacement. the uniform OD of the used clutch is similar, if not identical to that of an original 63 but go to the 65,66 0r 67 judging manual where the lengths of the shafts of a BBC vs SBC is discussed. i can't tell for sure from your photos but the used one appears to have the BBC length. mike
        Mike and Troy-------


        The new fan clutch pictured is a GM #3916141 or reproduction thereof. That fan clutch was originally used on some 1968 big blocks and continued to be used through 1969 for some big blocks. It has a shaft length originally intended for big blocks. However, over the years all of the other 1960-70 Corvette fan clutches were discontinued and replaced by the 3916141 for SERVICE. So, while the 3916141 does SERVICE all 1960-70 small blocks, it does not actually have the same shaft length as original small block fan clutches.

        The fan clutch on the right could be a GM #3814560 or 3814137 originally used for all 1963 Corvette applications. It definitely has the small block shaft length.

        By the way, GM did away with the different fan clutch shaft lengths after 1970 for both PRODUCTION and SERVICE. So, 1971-74 big blocks and small blocks used the same fan clutches although several different variations were used over the period.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        • David L.
          Expired
          • July 31, 1980
          • 3310

          #5
          Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

          According to my notes the measurement from the fan mounting surface to the water pump hub mounting surface is 1.8" for the 327 fan clutches and 1.4" for the 427 fan clutches.

          Dave

          Comment

          • Troy P.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • February 1, 1989
            • 1284

            #6
            Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

            Since my shaft is 1 3/8" (1.375" or roughly the 1.4" you mention) this would be for a big block per your notes. But Joe says it is the small block shaft length. So I'm confused.

            It is the fan clutch that came on my '63 when I bought it. But of course I can't say if it is the original factory installed part as it may have been replaced over the years.

            Comment

            • Mike M.
              NCRS Past President
              • May 31, 1974
              • 8383

              #7
              Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

              the 65,66 and 67 judging manuals give the specs on the clutch's shaft dimensions. mike

              Comment

              • Joe L.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • February 1, 1988
                • 43221

                #8
                Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

                Originally posted by Troy Pyles (14528)
                Since my shaft is 1 3/8" (1.375" or roughly the 1.4" you mention) this would be for a big block per your notes. But Joe says it is the small block shaft length. So I'm confused.

                It is the fan clutch that came on my '63 when I bought it. But of course I can't say if it is the original factory installed part as it may have been replaced over the years.

                Troy------


                Your existing fan clutch is definitely the small block fan clutch. In fact, you can clearly see the difference in lengths in your photo. The 3916141 is seen with the shorter shaft (since the 3916141 was originally a big block fan clutch) and your original clutch is seen with a longer shaft.That's exactly the difference between the small block and big block fan clutches.
                In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                Comment

                • David L.
                  Expired
                  • July 31, 1980
                  • 3310

                  #9
                  Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

                  Originally posted by Troy Pyles (14528)
                  Since my shaft is 1 3/8" (1.375" or roughly the 1.4" you mention) this would be for a big block per your notes. But Joe says it is the small block shaft length. So I'm confused.

                  It is the fan clutch that came on my '63 when I bought it. But of course I can't say if it is the original factory installed part as it may have been replaced over the years.
                  Troy,

                  Over the past 35 years I have owned many 6" dia. fan clutches similar to your vintage fan clutch. Most of them were identical to yours with many teeth around the perimeter and 2 "flat" areas (about 1/2" long or so) and at the 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock positions. However, I also once owned a fan clutch that was similar but had 4 "flat" areas at the 12 o'clock, 3 o'clock, 6 o'click, and 9 o'clock positions around the perimeter. I suspect that this fan clutch with the 4 "flat" areas was an early version used from 1960 to maybe 1963 or so.

                  Dave

                  Comment

                  • Richard G.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • July 31, 1984
                    • 1715

                    #10
                    Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

                    Below are pictures of the clutch removed from my 1963 340HP. I don't know for sure if it is original to the car.


                    It sure appears similar to the older on pictured above. I have not been able to decode the L7C ink stamp.
                    Attached Files

                    Comment

                    • David L.
                      Expired
                      • July 31, 1980
                      • 3310

                      #11
                      Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

                      Richard,

                      L7C =November 7, 1962

                      The fan clutch appears to be original for your 1963 assuming the date code checks out.

                      I had a similar fan clutch dated "L27G" (November 27, 1966) that came with a 5-blade Schwitzer fan dated "L6" (November 1966).

                      Refer to the link below.

                      Dave

                      showthread.php
                      Last edited by David L.; May 13, 2017, 06:41 PM.

                      Comment

                      • Richard G.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • July 31, 1984
                        • 1715

                        #12
                        Re: 63 360 HP fan clutch

                        thanks Dave.
                        My car has a build data of December 21 1962. Looks like it likely came on the car.
                        My odometer was at 80K but was broken when I purchased the car. I does have the original metallic pads still on the brakes.
                        My best guess is around 100K miles. Zero miles in the last 29 years. This will change soon.
                        Rick

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        Searching...Please wait.
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                        Search Result for "|||"