Re: 1970 Corvette LS5 454 4 speed consumes a lot of oil from day one
Steve-----
Yes, you're correct that the oil has to ultimately enter the combustion chamber through the valve guides or past the piston rings.
I also agree with you that if oil were leaking at the intake manifold gasket bottom there would also be a major vacuum leak. However, I think the oil, itself, would partly ameliorate this. I also agree that it would SEEM LIKE the amount of crush on the intake gaskets would seal even if there was an angularity problem between the manifold and cylinder heads.
However, I can tell you that I tried EVERYTHING to solve this problem on a small block once-upon-a-time. I changed intake manifolds at least twice. I changed reconditioned cylinder heads for brand new GM heads. I used every style valve seal available, from stock 0-ring to all teflon positive seals to Viton positive seals to umbrella seals. I used several different types of manifold gaskets from stock-type GM to several aftermarket types. I used different sealers on the gaskets from RTV to special aerospace sealers not even available in retail stores. NOTHING worked. Each and every time after trying something I got about 300 miles per quart of oil. Each and every time when I removed the intake manifold the intake ports in the heads right from the intake manifold interface were wet with oil and I mean WET. There was also considerable oil in the intake manifold passages. There's just no way I can conceive of that the intake ports could be wet with oil if the source of the oil were the valve guides/seals or the rings.
By the way, in desperation, I finally re-ringed the engine, de-glazing the bores, carefully cleaning them, and installing new rings. I didn't really expect this to work but I was desperate. It did not change anything---right back to 300 miles per quart. Also, this was definitely not a turbo or supercharged engine. It was a naturally aspirated, 4 barrel carb engine which was not even run hard, at all. It was built up from a factory new GM partial engine (short block) assembly.
I'm kind of surprised that you have not encountered this in all your years. Others have reported similar problems here on this board. In fact, at least one I seem to recall, posted pictures of intake ports wet with oil.
So, as I previously mentioned, if one finds the intake ports and manifold runners wet with oil, I do not see how the source could be valve guides/seals or rings. However, if there is no evidence of oil in the intake ports or manifold runners, then the source has to be valve guides/seals or rings.
Steve-----
Yes, you're correct that the oil has to ultimately enter the combustion chamber through the valve guides or past the piston rings.
I also agree with you that if oil were leaking at the intake manifold gasket bottom there would also be a major vacuum leak. However, I think the oil, itself, would partly ameliorate this. I also agree that it would SEEM LIKE the amount of crush on the intake gaskets would seal even if there was an angularity problem between the manifold and cylinder heads.
However, I can tell you that I tried EVERYTHING to solve this problem on a small block once-upon-a-time. I changed intake manifolds at least twice. I changed reconditioned cylinder heads for brand new GM heads. I used every style valve seal available, from stock 0-ring to all teflon positive seals to Viton positive seals to umbrella seals. I used several different types of manifold gaskets from stock-type GM to several aftermarket types. I used different sealers on the gaskets from RTV to special aerospace sealers not even available in retail stores. NOTHING worked. Each and every time after trying something I got about 300 miles per quart of oil. Each and every time when I removed the intake manifold the intake ports in the heads right from the intake manifold interface were wet with oil and I mean WET. There was also considerable oil in the intake manifold passages. There's just no way I can conceive of that the intake ports could be wet with oil if the source of the oil were the valve guides/seals or the rings.
By the way, in desperation, I finally re-ringed the engine, de-glazing the bores, carefully cleaning them, and installing new rings. I didn't really expect this to work but I was desperate. It did not change anything---right back to 300 miles per quart. Also, this was definitely not a turbo or supercharged engine. It was a naturally aspirated, 4 barrel carb engine which was not even run hard, at all. It was built up from a factory new GM partial engine (short block) assembly.
I'm kind of surprised that you have not encountered this in all your years. Others have reported similar problems here on this board. In fact, at least one I seem to recall, posted pictures of intake ports wet with oil.
So, as I previously mentioned, if one finds the intake ports and manifold runners wet with oil, I do not see how the source could be valve guides/seals or rings. However, if there is no evidence of oil in the intake ports or manifold runners, then the source has to be valve guides/seals or rings.
Comment