Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971 - NCRS Discussion Boards

Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike E.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • February 28, 1975
    • 5132

    Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

    Too much time on my hands to think (open heart surgery on 1/20). Between 1970 and 1971 the rear bulkhead was moved forward several inches. 4? Can't really go out and measure right now. But dealer album, AMA spec sheets, etc. show no difference between the years. 5.0 cubic feet for the convertible, 6.1 for the coupe. Has anyone ever seen different specs? Like I said, too much time to think.
  • Bob W.
    Very Frequent User
    • November 30, 1977
    • 798

    #2
    Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

    Mike HOPE all went well !!!!!

    Comment

    • Terry M.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • September 30, 1980
      • 15573

      #3
      Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

      Originally posted by Mike Ernst (211)
      Too much time on my hands to think (open heart surgery on 1/20). Between 1970 and 1971 the rear bulkhead was moved forward several inches. 4? Can't really go out and measure right now. But dealer album, AMA spec sheets, etc. show no difference between the years. 5.0 cubic feet for the convertible, 6.1 for the coupe. Has anyone ever seen different specs? Like I said, too much time to think.
      Hey, forget about cargo capacity.

      Best of luck with your surgery. Be sure to stick to the rehab plan. That is best for your long-term recovery. Don't ask how I know.
      You have a lot of people praying for you.
      Terry

      Comment

      • Loren L.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • April 30, 1976
        • 4104

        #4
        Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

        Capacity has nothing to compare to the surgery - I assume the light at the end of the tunnel burns a little brighter and clearer now? Help me plan - is Carlisle on the menu for summer? All the best Mike, and Thank You for past Good Deeds.

        Comment

        • Richard M.
          Super Moderator
          • August 31, 1988
          • 11299

          #5
          Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

          Mike, You already had the surgery on Jan 20th? Thankfully it went well and you're okay.

          Too much time on your hands? When your Dr says it's ok, how 'bout you get outa' the WI cold and come down here for a while. We have plenty of Corvettes to play with.

          Sorry I can't help with the Cargo Capacity query, but I do have a question.....Why did they move the rear bulkhead forward?

          Rich

          Comment

          • Eric E.
            Very Frequent User
            • October 31, 1998
            • 254

            #6
            Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

            Hi Mike,
            cant help you with the cargo question but like the others, hope you are doing well and following the Dr.s orders. Your C3 convert will be there waiting when your ready!
            Take care, Eric

            Comment

            • Rodney R.
              Expired
              • July 8, 2013
              • 58

              #7
              Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

              Mike
              We are all glad you have to much time on your hands!! That is a very painful recovery. Take it easy, even when you think your pain is starting to go away and try to do something, you will set yourself back on the recovery process. Trust me I know.
              Take care, Rodney

              Comment

              • Kenneth B.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • August 31, 1984
                • 2084

                #8
                Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

                Best of luck with your recovery. As Terry said do your rehab. I had a stent put in 2 years ago.
                65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
                What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE

                Comment

                • Mike F.
                  Expired
                  • April 25, 2011
                  • 668

                  #9
                  Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

                  I guess I've been living under a rock, I've never heard that the bulkhead was moved between 70 & 71. Where did you find this information?

                  Comment

                  • William C.
                    NCRS Past President
                    • May 31, 1975
                    • 6037

                    #10
                    Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

                    Best wishes for a speedy recovery Mike!
                    Bill Clupper #618

                    Comment

                    • Mike E.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • February 28, 1975
                      • 5132

                      #11
                      Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

                      Thanks for the good thoughts my friends! One valve and 3 bypasses, and better each day! Mike, if you measure from the rear bulkhead to the back of the luggage retainer (semi-vertical panel behind the seats) on a 70 convertible it is roughly 31 inches, on a 71-72 about 28. The design is also changed so that on 71-72 water into the rear plenum dumps directly from the plenum to the ground, whereas 70 dumps through a pair of rubber tubes that partially intrude into the rear bulkhead, then through the body drains, and then to the ground.

                      Comment

                      • Dave S.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • August 31, 1992
                        • 2918

                        #12
                        Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

                        Originally posted by Mike Ernst (211)
                        Thanks for the good thoughts my friends! One valve and 3 bypasses, and better each day! Mike, if you measure from the rear bulkhead to the back of the luggage retainer (semi-vertical panel behind the seats) on a 70 convertible it is roughly 31 inches, on a 71-72 about 28. The design is also changed so that on 71-72 water into the rear plenum dumps directly from the plenum to the ground, whereas 70 dumps through a pair of rubber tubes that partially intrude into the rear bulkhead, then through the body drains, and then to the ground.
                        Best wishes Reverend. We missed you in Lakeland.

                        Comment

                        • James B.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • February 28, 1985
                          • 217

                          #13
                          Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

                          I was able to locate some excellent information on this topic in the TDB archives. Check out the thread started by Tom Freeman.
                          Subject title: Luggage Compartment Size
                          The thread was started on July 13, 2002.

                          Comment

                          • James G.
                            Extremely Frequent Poster
                            • May 31, 1976
                            • 1556

                            #14
                            Re: Cargo capacity 1970 vs. 1971

                            I am very happy you are on the mend. Too many friends with medical issues. Get well. I never knew the luggage area was different. Must have been for water drainage problems. See you in San Antonio ?
                            Over 80 Corvettes of fun ! Love Rochester Fuel Injection 57-65 cars. Love CORVETTE RACE CARS
                            Co-Founder REGISTRY OF CORVETTE RACE CARS.COM

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            Searching...Please wait.
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                            There are no results that meet this criteria.
                            Search Result for "|||"