There was a recent question regarding water pump hubs. So, I thought I'd start a new thread and post some information and thoughts on this subject.
During the 1955-68 period (and through 1970 for Corvettes and some MD/HD truck applicationsonly), all small block waterpumps were "short leg" and used a shaft /bearing assembly with a 5/8" OD shaft, end-to-end. Consequently, all waterpump hubs had a 5/8" shaft orifice. During the period of 1955 to ABOUT 1965, I believe that all Chevrolet applications used a pulley/fan bolt circle of 1-3/4". So, I believe that during this period all SB waterpump hubs, PRODUCTION or SERVICE, had a single, 1-3/4" bolt pattern.
After ABOUT 1965 and through 1968 some Chevrolet applications (but not Corvette) went to a 2-1/8" bolt circle. During this period, PRODUCTION waterpumps for such applications probably used a single 2-1/8" bolt circle hub (I really don't know, for sure, since I don't really study non-Corvette applications). However, SERVICE waterpumps began being fitted with the dual pattern hubs because, except for the hub bolt pattern (and, sometimes, hub spacing), the pumps were otherwise the same.
For 1969-70, things changed. The PRODUCTION use of the short leg waterpumps was drastically reduced as most applications changed to the "long leg" style waterpumps. The only exceptions were Corvette and some MD/HD truck applications. It's during this period that I believe some PRODUCTION waterpumps will be found with dual pattern hubs. Most likely, this occurred because with the drastically reduced requirements for short leg waterpumps, there was much less of a cost savings incentive for different hubs being used for PRODUCTION and SERVICE.
For 1971 things changed again. All Chevrolet SB waterpumps went to a 3/4" shaft bearing assembly. While most applications used a "long leg" style pump with a 5/8" pilot, the shaft through the bearing and through the hub was 3/4". Corvette and some MD/HD trucks were the exception. They used a short leg pump body (but somewhat different than the pre-71 short leg body) and a 3/4" pilot. So, the waterpump hub for all 1971+ Chevrolet applications had a 3/4" orifice for the shaft. So far, I have never seen a hub for a 1971+ Chevrolet waterpump, PRODUCTION or SERVICE, with anything but a single pattern, 2-1/8" bolt circle. Why? Well, I expect it's because there was never ANY Chevrolet application ever made which used a 3/4" shaft waterpump with a 1-3/4" bolt circle. So, why incur the extra cost of manufacturing 3/4" shaft hubs with 4 extra tapped holes?
By the way, while 1955-1970 waterpumps used a 5/8" shaft through the bearing and hub and 1971-82 used a 3/4" shaft through the bearing and hub, ALL 1955-82 waterpumps used a 5/8" shaft inboard of the bearing on the rotor end.
During the 1955-68 period (and through 1970 for Corvettes and some MD/HD truck applicationsonly), all small block waterpumps were "short leg" and used a shaft /bearing assembly with a 5/8" OD shaft, end-to-end. Consequently, all waterpump hubs had a 5/8" shaft orifice. During the period of 1955 to ABOUT 1965, I believe that all Chevrolet applications used a pulley/fan bolt circle of 1-3/4". So, I believe that during this period all SB waterpump hubs, PRODUCTION or SERVICE, had a single, 1-3/4" bolt pattern.
After ABOUT 1965 and through 1968 some Chevrolet applications (but not Corvette) went to a 2-1/8" bolt circle. During this period, PRODUCTION waterpumps for such applications probably used a single 2-1/8" bolt circle hub (I really don't know, for sure, since I don't really study non-Corvette applications). However, SERVICE waterpumps began being fitted with the dual pattern hubs because, except for the hub bolt pattern (and, sometimes, hub spacing), the pumps were otherwise the same.
For 1969-70, things changed. The PRODUCTION use of the short leg waterpumps was drastically reduced as most applications changed to the "long leg" style waterpumps. The only exceptions were Corvette and some MD/HD truck applications. It's during this period that I believe some PRODUCTION waterpumps will be found with dual pattern hubs. Most likely, this occurred because with the drastically reduced requirements for short leg waterpumps, there was much less of a cost savings incentive for different hubs being used for PRODUCTION and SERVICE.
For 1971 things changed again. All Chevrolet SB waterpumps went to a 3/4" shaft bearing assembly. While most applications used a "long leg" style pump with a 5/8" pilot, the shaft through the bearing and through the hub was 3/4". Corvette and some MD/HD trucks were the exception. They used a short leg pump body (but somewhat different than the pre-71 short leg body) and a 3/4" pilot. So, the waterpump hub for all 1971+ Chevrolet applications had a 3/4" orifice for the shaft. So far, I have never seen a hub for a 1971+ Chevrolet waterpump, PRODUCTION or SERVICE, with anything but a single pattern, 2-1/8" bolt circle. Why? Well, I expect it's because there was never ANY Chevrolet application ever made which used a 3/4" shaft waterpump with a 1-3/4" bolt circle. So, why incur the extra cost of manufacturing 3/4" shaft hubs with 4 extra tapped holes?
By the way, while 1955-1970 waterpumps used a 5/8" shaft through the bearing and hub and 1971-82 used a 3/4" shaft through the bearing and hub, ALL 1955-82 waterpumps used a 5/8" shaft inboard of the bearing on the rotor end.
Comment