Opinion on Engine stamp - NCRS Discussion Boards

Opinion on Engine stamp

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Raymond H.
    Expired
    • September 18, 2015
    • 12

    Opinion on Engine stamp

    I would like your opinion on this pad.....The Cummings part of the stamp is interesting anyone know what that is. Thanks in advance for your help.
    Attached Files
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 31, 1988
    • 43191

    #2
    Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

    Originally posted by Raymond Huffer (61620)
    I would like your opinion on this pad.....The Cummings part of the stamp is interesting anyone know what that is. Thanks in advance for your help.

    Raymond-------

    From what I can see of it, I think the engine stampings are OK. The stamping above them is almost certainly the stamping of a shop that rebuilt the engine at some point in the car's history.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Michael J.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • January 26, 2009
      • 7066

      #3
      Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

      I usually don't comment on these, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it appears NTFP.
      Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

      Comment

      • Raymond H.
        Expired
        • September 18, 2015
        • 12

        #4
        Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

        Thanks Joe

        Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
        Raymond-------

        From what I can see of it, I think the engine stampings are OK. The stamping above them is almost certainly the stamping of a shop that rebuilt the engine at some point in the car's history.

        Comment

        • Raymond H.
          Expired
          • September 18, 2015
          • 12

          #5
          Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

          Hey Michael thanks for the response but I don't know what that means NTFP

          Comment

          • Michael J.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • January 26, 2009
            • 7066

            #6
            Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

            Originally posted by Raymond Huffer (61620)
            Hey Michael thanks for the response but I don't know what that means NTFP
            Standard NCRS acronym for "Not Typical Factory Production". Which in judging would garner a deduction of points.
            Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

            Comment

            • Raymond H.
              Expired
              • September 18, 2015
              • 12

              #7
              Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

              Thanks I learn something everyday....appreciate the help

              Comment

              • Michael J.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • January 26, 2009
                • 7066

                #8
                Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

                You're welcome. Not being a mechanical judge (the ones who judge stamp pads, among other things) I don't know how much deduction it would be. As Joe says, most of the pad appears fine, but it is surprising a rebuilder would do such a thing to a valuable area like the stamp pad of a Corvette. Must have been done long ago when these were just another used car.
                Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

                Comment

                • Patrick B.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • August 31, 1985
                  • 1985

                  #9
                  Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

                  Raymond ---- I agree with Joe. The VIN and Flint stamps look completely original, and the grain is also good. The Cummings part is certainly a shop that rebuilt the engine before anyone cared about stamping pads. At least they left the GM stamping alone which is better than most rebuilders who would have decked it even if it wasn't necessary.

                  Comment

                  • Raymond H.
                    Expired
                    • September 18, 2015
                    • 12

                    #10
                    Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

                    Thanks Patrick

                    Comment

                    • David H.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • June 30, 2001
                      • 1481

                      #11
                      Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

                      Raymond,

                      Welcome to the Forum.

                      The engine casting number, casting date, plant assembly stamping/partial VIN, and engine pad factory machining marks are all judged by Standard Deduction Guideline #1 found on page 29 of the current Judging Reference Manual. I don't see where any points would be deducted using SDG presuming the casting number/date/assembly date/VIN are also appropriate for your car.

                      The JRM is available (inexpensive) from the NCRS bookstore.

                      Dave
                      Last edited by David H.; October 15, 2016, 03:28 PM. Reason: Spelling
                      Judging Chairman Mid-Way USA (Kansas) Chapter

                      Comment

                      • Raymond H.
                        Expired
                        • September 18, 2015
                        • 12

                        #12
                        Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

                        Thanks David

                        Comment

                        • Michael W.
                          Expired
                          • March 31, 1997
                          • 4290

                          #13
                          Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

                          I agree with David H in that NO points should be deducted. The rules for the pad surface do not require that the entire surface be 'original' just that some traces remain.

                          Comment

                          • Philip A.
                            Expired
                            • February 25, 2008
                            • 329

                            #14
                            Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

                            Originally posted by Michael Ward (29001)
                            I agree with David H in that NO points should be deducted. The rules for the pad surface do not require that the entire surface be 'original' just that some traces remain.
                            I would tend to disagree. I do not believe any of the judging rules specify "entire"; it would be naturally presumed anything additional is NTFP. Applying a standard of the word "entire" being absent from the judging standard would allow all kinds of addition modifications, such as pin striping, racing stripes, etc

                            Comment

                            • David H.
                              Extremely Frequent Poster
                              • June 30, 2001
                              • 1481

                              #15
                              Re: Opinion on Engine stamp

                              Originally posted by Philip Arena (48654)
                              I would tend to disagree. I do not believe any of the judging rules specify "entire"; it would be naturally presumed anything additional is NTFP. Applying a standard of the word "entire" being absent from the judging standard would allow all kinds of addition modifications, such as pin striping, racing stripes, etc
                              Philip,

                              There is no NTFP provision for judging engine cases, only the Standard Deduction Guideline #1. Matrix judging (CDCIF) only comes into play when there is no Standard Deduction Guideline for an area.

                              Dave
                              Judging Chairman Mid-Way USA (Kansas) Chapter

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"