Tung Sol 536? - NCRS Discussion Boards

Tung Sol 536?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike F.
    Expired
    • April 25, 2011
    • 668

    Tung Sol 536?

    Based on the 5th Edition 70-72 TIMJG my Tung Sol #536 hazard flasher is now incorrect for my 1970.

    The #536 that i removed is non-DOT marked and is dated 479 (47th week 1969 or possibly 79(but no DOT)?). My car has a May build date.(23rd week 1970)

    So after buying a #552, was the #536 original after all?



    Last edited by Mike F.; September 24, 2016, 08:19 PM.
  • Dave S.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • August 31, 1992
    • 2924

    #2
    Re: Tung Sol 536?

    Originally posted by Mike Furline (53259)
    Based on the 5th Edition 70-72 TIMJG my Tung Sol #536 hazard flasher is now incorrect for my 1970.

    The #536 that i removed is non-DOT marked and is dated 479 (47th week 1969 or possibly 79(but no DOT)?). My car has a May build date.(23rd week 1970)

    So after buying a #552, was the #536 original after all?



    Mike,
    Isn't the #536 Ideal correct for the hazard flasher and the blue plastic #224 Tung Sol correct for the turn signal flasher.? Don't have my judging guide handy but that's what I recall.

    Comment

    Working...
    Searching...Please wait.
    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
    There are no results that meet this criteria.
    Search Result for "|||"