LS-5 shroud extension #3956089 - NCRS Discussion Boards

LS-5 shroud extension #3956089

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tom L.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • October 17, 2006
    • 1439

    LS-5 shroud extension #3956089

    My '72 LS-5 has been missing it's shroud extension for the #3956119 shroud in the car. I have searched for quite a while for one to help with cooling, especially with the a/c on. it requires the GM #3956089 extension and seems to be quite elusive. I've gotten to the point where I'm considering a reproduction extension. The Doc and others have them listed but have read comments about poor fit. Has anyone had experience with one of these? And do they have the correct part number molded into them. Thanks!
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43220

    #2
    Re: LS-5 shroud extension #3956089

    Originally posted by Tom Larsen (46337)
    My '72 LS-5 has been missing it's shroud extension for the #3956119 shroud in the car. I have searched for quite a while for one to help with cooling, especially with the a/c on. it requires the GM #3956089 extension and seems to be quite elusive. I've gotten to the point where I'm considering a reproduction extension. The Doc and others have them listed but have read comments about poor fit. Has anyone had experience with one of these? And do they have the correct part number molded into them. Thanks!

    Tom------


    My vague recollection is that the original 3956089 extensions didn't fit very well, either. As I recall, many cars may have left the factory without one installed.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Tom L.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • October 17, 2006
      • 1439

      #3
      Re: LS-5 shroud extension #3956089

      My brother in law has a '69 with the extension in question and his fits perfectly, is that odd? Also, in judging the words "Typical factory production" keep coming up. Since you mention that many cars left the factory left without one, is the extension judged or penalized if missing? Would a missing extension be considered TFP? Thanks!

      Comment

      Working...
      Searching...Please wait.
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
      There are no results that meet this criteria.
      Search Result for "|||"