1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285 - NCRS Discussion Boards

1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John C.
    Expired
    • July 11, 2011
    • 122

    1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285

    Interesting:

  • Mark S.
    Very Frequent User
    • July 31, 1983
    • 660

    #2
    Re: 1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285

    I assume that the rubber cover for the solenoid is extra!

    Comment

    • John C.
      Expired
      • July 11, 2011
      • 122

      #3
      Re: 1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285

      No, it's free.....the original 767 solenoid had no rubber cover! This is an original NOS 767 and there are no provisions to retain a boot. The later model 789 solenoid had a boot.
      Last edited by John C.; June 13, 2016, 12:29 PM.

      Comment

      • Edward M.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • November 1, 1985
        • 1916

        #4
        Re: 1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285

        Hmmmmmmmm...
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • John C.
          Expired
          • July 11, 2011
          • 122

          #5
          Re: 1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285

          Hmmmmmmmm... ? Hmmmmmmmm... what?

          Are you suggesting that's not the original stamp?



          Last edited by John C.; June 13, 2016, 01:43 PM.

          Comment

          • Ed S.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • August 6, 2014
            • 1377

            #6
            Re: 1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285

            Originally posted by Edward McComas (9316)
            Hmmmmmmmm...
            Is it my old eyes or do the characters appear to be raised as opposed to stamped into the block pad?
            Ed

            Comment

            • John C.
              Expired
              • July 11, 2011
              • 122

              #7
              Re: 1956 Corvette 225HP RPO 469 Engine - GM-3733285

              Hi Ed,

              Yes, I can relate to that, but they are definitely stamped....1st 5 are gang stamped, next 2 are individuals and the last 5 are ganged.
              .
              John

              Comment

              Working...
              Searching...Please wait.
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
              There are no results that meet this criteria.
              Search Result for "|||"