Bellhousing Depth - NCRS Discussion Boards

Bellhousing Depth

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Joe C.
    Expired
    • August 31, 1999
    • 4598

    Bellhousing Depth

    Does any one know the depth of a "403" bellhousing?
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43211

    #2
    Re: Bellhousing Depth

    Originally posted by Joe Ciaravino (32899)
    Does any one know the depth of a "403" bellhousing?

    Joe-------


    6.29" from the block mating surface to the transmission mounting surface. This dimension is the same for the "383", "403", "444" and "621" bellhousings.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Hugh G.
      Expired
      • January 14, 2015
      • 64

      #3
      Re: Bellhousing Depth

      Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
      Joe-------


      6.29" from the block mating surface to the transmission mounting surface. This dimension is the same for the "383", "403", "444" and "621" bellhousings.
      Would the 6.29" measurement be true for a "421" bellhousing??

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • February 1, 1988
        • 43211

        #4
        Re: Bellhousing Depth

        Originally posted by Hugh Gregan (60832)
        Would the 6.29" measurement be true for a "421" bellhousing??

        Hugh------


        Yes.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        • Hugh G.
          Expired
          • January 14, 2015
          • 64

          #5
          Re: Bellhousing Depth

          Thanks for the infor. I'm using a 383 on my 63 and hoping for not unforeseen problems.

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43211

            #6
            Re: Bellhousing Depth

            Originally posted by Hugh Gregan (60832)
            Thanks for the infor. I'm using a 383 on my 63 and hoping for not unforeseen problems.

            Hugh------


            There will be no problem as long as you use the 64+ front bearing retainer. However, the 1963 transmission cases were not designed for the use of this retainer.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Joe C.
              Expired
              • August 31, 1999
              • 4598

              #7
              Re: Bellhousing Depth

              Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
              Joe-------


              6.29" from the block mating surface to the transmission mounting surface. This dimension is the same for the "383", "403", "444" and "621" bellhousings.

              Thanks Joe.

              Comment

              • Tom P.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • April 1, 1980
                • 1814

                #8
                Re: Bellhousing Depth

                Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
                Hugh------


                There will be no problem as long as you use the 64+ front bearing retainer. However, the 1963 transmission cases were not designed for the use of this retainer.
                Well, sorta.
                In 1963 ONLY, the front bearing retainer on 4spds was smaller than 55-62 and 64-later transmissions---------------------EXCEPT, EXCEPT, EXCEPT on 409 cars!!!! The 1963 ONLY 409 cars with a 4sp used the SAME front bearing retainer as was used on 55-62 3sp transmissions. SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, all that is needed to be done to fit a 63 only transmission into a 64-later bell housing is to round up a 55-62 3sp front bearing retainer and install it on a 63 4sp. TOOOOOOOOOOOO EASY!

                Oh ya, also, beginning with 1955 cars (pass car, Corvette, doesn't matter), all bell housings (cast iron or alum) are the SAME depth. Think about it------------from the front face of the transmission case to the pilot on the end of the input shaft, the dimension on ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Chevy manual transmissions (3sp, 4sp, doesn't matter) is the same dimension. Thus, the dimension from the front to the rear of all bell housings has to be the same----------------and that includes truck bell housings which were used for 12in clutches.

                Comment

                • Hugh G.
                  Expired
                  • January 14, 2015
                  • 64

                  #9
                  Re: Bellhousing Depth

                  Originally posted by Tom Parsons (3491)
                  Well, sorta.
                  In 1963 ONLY, the front bearing retainer on 4spds was smaller than 55-62 and 64-later transmissions---------------------EXCEPT, EXCEPT, EXCEPT on 409 cars!!!! The 1963 ONLY 409 cars with a 4sp used the SAME front bearing retainer as was used on 55-62 3sp transmissions. SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, all that is needed to be done to fit a 63 only transmission into a 64-later bell housing is to round up a 55-62 3sp front bearing retainer and install it on a 63 4sp. TOOOOOOOOOOOO EASY!

                  Oh ya, also, beginning with 1955 cars (pass car, Corvette, doesn't matter), all bell housings (cast iron or alum) are the SAME depth. Think about it------------from the front face of the transmission case to the pilot on the end of the input shaft, the dimension on ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Chevy manual transmissions (3sp, 4sp, doesn't matter) is the same dimension. Thus, the dimension from the front to the rear of all bell housings has to be the same----------------and that includes truck bell housings which were used for 12in clutches.
                  Thanks guys. Sadly my 63 has a t10-C that has the larger front bearing retainer plus the wrong bellhousing (1958) and a 163 (higher tooth count) flywheel (1959). I did not know I had the incorrect trannie till I tried to fit a "421" on the it. Luckily I did fit check on the bench prior to attempting to install it. As I stated I just bought a "383" and it fits fine and matches up with the correct flywheel. I'm now looking for a 1962 July-Aug t10-D trannie to mate with my "421".

                  Comment

                  • Joe L.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • February 1, 1988
                    • 43211

                    #10
                    Re: Bellhousing Depth

                    Originally posted by Hugh Gregan (60832)
                    Thanks guys. Sadly my 63 has a t10-C that has the larger front bearing retainer plus the wrong bellhousing (1958) and a 163 (higher tooth count) flywheel (1959). I did not know I had the incorrect trannie till I tried to fit a "421" on the it. Luckily I did fit check on the bench prior to attempting to install it. As I stated I just bought a "383" and it fits fine and matches up with the correct flywheel. I'm now looking for a 1962 July-Aug t10-D trannie to mate with my "421".

                    Hugh------

                    By "...wrong bellhousing (1958)" do you mean that you have a 1958 bellhousing on your 1963? The 1958 bellhousings were cast iron and used a bellhousing-mounted starter.

                    There was no 163 tooth flywheel. All 1956-62 Corvettes used a 14", 168 tooth flywheel. All 1963-68 Corvette small blocks used a 12-3/4", 153 tooth flywheel.
                    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                    Comment

                    • Hugh G.
                      Expired
                      • January 14, 2015
                      • 64

                      #11
                      Re: Bellhousing Depth

                      You are correct I had a 58 bellhousing and my starter mounted to it. The bellhousing was cast and the flywheel was the 168 tooth. This particular flywheel took a 10.3(?) inch {small} but I replaced the clutch and the starter along with the flywheel and bellhousing.

                      Comment

                      • Tom D.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • September 30, 1981
                        • 2132

                        #12
                        Re: Bellhousing Depth

                        In addition, I believe the '65 big block Corvettes also had the 153 tooth flywheel.
                        https://MichiganNCRS.org
                        Michigan Chapter
                        Tom Dingman

                        Comment

                        • Joe L.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • February 1, 1988
                          • 43211

                          #13
                          Re: Bellhousing Depth

                          Originally posted by Tom Dingman (4889)
                          In addition, I believe the '65 big block Corvettes also had the 153 tooth flywheel.


                          Tom-------

                          Yes, 1965 L-78 did use a 12-3/4", 153 tooth flywheel. 1967-69 L-88/ZL-1 did, too. However, the flywheel used for all of these applications was not the same as the one used for 63-68 small blocks. The flywheel was a "lightweight" 12-3/4", 153 tooth flywheel. No other Corvette big blocks used a 12-3/4" flywheel.
                          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                          Comment

                          • Joe L.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • February 1, 1988
                            • 43211

                            #14
                            Re: Bellhousing Depth

                            Originally posted by Tom Parsons (3491)
                            Well, sorta.
                            In 1963 ONLY, the front bearing retainer on 4spds was smaller than 55-62 and 64-later transmissions---------------------EXCEPT, EXCEPT, EXCEPT on 409 cars!!!! The 1963 ONLY 409 cars with a 4sp used the SAME front bearing retainer as was used on 55-62 3sp transmissions. SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, all that is needed to be done to fit a 63 only transmission into a 64-later bell housing is to round up a 55-62 3sp front bearing retainer and install it on a 63 4sp. TOOOOOOOOOOOO EASY!

                            Oh ya, also, beginning with 1955 cars (pass car, Corvette, doesn't matter), all bell housings (cast iron or alum) are the SAME depth. Think about it------------from the front face of the transmission case to the pilot on the end of the input shaft, the dimension on ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Chevy manual transmissions (3sp, 4sp, doesn't matter) is the same dimension. Thus, the dimension from the front to the rear of all bell housings has to be the same----------------and that includes truck bell housings which were used for 12in clutches.

                            Tom-------


                            Like this one [not for sale]



                            Attached Files
                            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                            Comment

                            • Tom P.
                              Extremely Frequent Poster
                              • April 1, 1980
                              • 1814

                              #15
                              Re: Bellhousing Depth

                              Joe,
                              That looks like the one!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"