Help with this engine pad authenticity - NCRS Discussion Boards

Help with this engine pad authenticity

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gary J.
    Very Frequent User
    • April 3, 2008
    • 153

    Help with this engine pad authenticity

    pad pic.jpg
    This pad is on ebay currently, I notice a double hit on the seven (probably not an issue) and an upside down 8 in the vin sequence.
    Also is it the light in the shot or do the engine build date numbers seem to be raised and not recessed?
    Thanks for your thoughts
    New England Chapter NCRS
  • Patrick B.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • August 31, 1985
    • 1995

    #2
    Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

    This is a good original stamp with nice grain. The extra 7 is just the tool bouncing back onto the pad after the hammer blow.

    Comment

    • Gene M.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • April 1, 1985
      • 4232

      #3
      Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

      Gary,
      IMO the O in the build and the vin first 1 are not typical of small blocks assembled a day before and day after this pad. The 17,000 build in my collection do not have a "lower" position first 1 in the vin. This was well done.

      Comment

      • Mike E.
        Very Frequent User
        • June 24, 2012
        • 920

        #4
        Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

        I don't really like the paint on the car. It looks to me the front fenders are a different shade of rally red perhaps it's just the way it was photographed. I would like to see a few shots of the frame to how good the cars bones are. I realize your asking about the pad, sorry about changing the subject.

        Mike

        Comment

        • John D.
          Very Frequent User
          • June 30, 1991
          • 875

          #5
          Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

          Originally posted by Gene Manno (8571)
          Gary,
          IMO the O in the build and the vin first 1 are not typical of small blocks assembled a day before and day after this pad. The 17,000 build in my collection do not have a "lower" position first 1 in the vin. This was well done.
          gene

          Dunno...I have a pic of a pad 700 cars from that with the same spacing between the 7 and the 1 and the very same upside down 8.

          Comment

          • Michael H.
            Very Frequent User
            • December 1, 1987
            • 726

            #6
            Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

            Originally posted by Patrick Boyd (9110)
            This is a good original stamp with nice grain. The extra 7 is just the tool bouncing back onto the pad after the hammer blow.
            I agree with Pat.

            Mike

            Comment

            • Gene M.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • April 1, 1985
              • 4232

              #7
              Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

              Originally posted by John Daly (19684)
              gene

              Dunno...I have a pic of a pad 700 cars from that with the same spacing between the 7 and the 1 and the very same upside down 8.
              The space looks fine but is that it is lower. But that's not what got my attention as much as the build O is different in the day before and days after. Yes, it looks good unless you compare to numbers just before and just after the build.

              Comment

              • Loren L.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • April 30, 1976
                • 4104

                #8
                Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

                Would someone explain to me "how" you get a double hit on just one of the 7s?

                Comment

                • Stewart L.
                  Very Frequent User
                  • March 1, 1980
                  • 353

                  #9
                  Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

                  The car is in Mass, an area known for rusty cars. In looking at the photos and blowing up the the engine compartment photo, look at the rust on the upper control arm and other parts in the engine area and compare it to the fresh engine pad, to me that raises a flag. Even if the block has been cleaned during a rebuild, it should show some patina IMO.
                  And has been pointed out previously, the doors and front end are a different color but that's as easy fix if everything else is good.
                  I also would wonder if the control arm looks like that, what does the frame and other suspension look like? I say whether the stamp is original or not, there are probably more problems with this car. You can do better.

                  Comment

                  • Edward J.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • September 15, 2008
                    • 6941

                    #10
                    Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

                    Gary, Mistakes happen in the process of engine stamps , My take is it appears to look like a untampered with and the broach marks are good, I would get all the casting dates and see how they line up with the assy. date of the engine.I have seen a few ghost stamps on the pads here on the TDB.
                    New England chapter member, 63 Convert. 327/340- Chapter/Regional/national Top Flight, 72 coupe- chapter and regional Top Flight.

                    Comment

                    • Michael W.
                      Expired
                      • April 1, 1997
                      • 4290

                      #11
                      Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

                      Originally posted by Loren Lundberg (912)
                      Would someone explain to me "how" you get a double hit on just one of the 7s?
                      Possibly the ghost 7 is an image of the first 7 in the VIN derivative. The tool landed at an angle during the bounce.

                      Comment

                      • Donald O.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • May 31, 1990
                        • 1585

                        #12
                        Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

                        Originally posted by Loren Lundberg (912)
                        Would someone explain to me "how" you get a double hit on just one of the 7s?
                        Did you get your copy of the Driveline and Restorer yet?
                        Just wondering out loud.

                        DonO
                        The light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.

                        Comment

                        • Patrick T.
                          Expired
                          • September 30, 1999
                          • 1286

                          #13
                          Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

                          Originally posted by Patrick Boyd (9110)
                          This is a good original stamp with nice grain. The extra 7 is just the tool bouncing back onto the pad after the hammer blow.
                          Here is my '67 L-79 pad which I had both John Hinckley and Al Grenning look at. They both agreed that it was a real factory stamp and John said the 6 had a rebound hit like yours. You can see it faintly under the 1.

                          Comment

                          • Jack M.
                            Extremely Frequent Poster
                            • March 1, 1991
                            • 1150

                            #14
                            Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

                            Originally posted by Loren Lundberg (912)
                            Would someone explain to me "how" you get a double hit on just one of the 7s?

                            Initially, I had a similar concern... but an enlargement shows an additional/faint number (1) between the 1 and 7.
                            7117846.jpg

                            Comment

                            • Joseph T.
                              Very Frequent User
                              • March 1, 1986
                              • 169

                              #15
                              Re: Help with this engine pad authenticity

                              I agree with Pat-No doubt that is an OEM stamp from the General

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"