67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap - NCRS Discussion Boards

67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stephen G.
    Very Frequent User
    • January 1, 2002
    • 304

    67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

    I believe the oil cap on my car to be correct and original. Judges in the past have complained about the lack (or slight size) of the dimple on the bottom of the rivet.

    On a recent trip to LA I looked through a BUCKET of oil caps and found a few indentical to mine. It has the "S" on the top of the rivet and the "SM" mark twice. It appears to be a double strike.

    It has the greenish/blueish color.

    Oil Cap Botton.jpgOil Cap Top.jpg
    Steve Gansky
    Newtown, (Bucks County) PA
  • Ara G.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • January 31, 2008
    • 1108

    #2
    Re: 67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

    Steve, I have seen a few double striked caps, however I would expect to see a much deeper/more pronounced dimple on the underside of the cap. The double strike doesn't bother me, but the width/gerth of the S on the center rivet as well as how shallow the dimple is on the underside would cause me some genuine concern. If I were judging that item, I certainly would bring both of the above to your attention. Regards, and Happy New Year. ARA

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43221

      #3
      Re: 67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

      Originally posted by Stephen Gansky (37182)
      I believe the oil cap on my car to be correct and original. Judges in the past have complained about the lack (or slight size) of the dimple on the bottom of the rivet.

      On a recent trip to LA I looked through a BUCKET of oil caps and found a few indentical to mine. It has the "S" on the top of the rivet and the "SM" mark twice. It appears to be a double strike.

      It has the greenish/blueish color.

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]57187[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]57188[/ATTACH]

      Steve-----


      I think it's original. Anyone that thinks that every one of these caps was exactly the same with respect to every minor nuance is nuts.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Philip A.
        Expired
        • February 26, 2008
        • 329

        #4
        Re: 67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

        Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
        Steve-----


        I think it's original. Anyone that thinks that every one of these caps was exactly the same with respect to every minor nuance is nuts.
        I agree with Joe . Clearly the part is original but a double stamp is NTFP and at judge discretion to deduct or not.

        Comment

        • Ara G.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • January 31, 2008
          • 1108

          #5
          Re: 67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

          Originally posted by Philip Arena (48654)
          I agree with Joe . Clearly the part is original but a double stamp is NTFP and at judge discretion to deduct or not.
          I agree as well - the double stamp of the SM logo does not bother me at all, but the font and size of the S on the rivet as well as the dimple do some.

          Comment

          • Joe R.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • July 31, 1976
            • 4550

            #6
            Re: 67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

            The cap is original to a 67 BB 400HP!!!!

            That's it folks!!!!

            JR

            Comment

            • Robert B.
              Very Frequent User
              • March 1, 1992
              • 265

              #7
              Re: 67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

              nice original cap. can't believe someone would be such and expert and question it.

              Comment

              • Stephen G.
                Very Frequent User
                • January 1, 2002
                • 304

                #8
                Re: 67 BB (400 HP) Oil Cap

                Thanks for the input gents.
                Steve Gansky
                Newtown, (Bucks County) PA

                Comment

                Working...
                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"