64 vette 365 horse has original date coded rear diff cover that someone installed the long bolts in the front holes and cracked the end of the hole on one side causing gear oil to leak. Can this be safely repaired by a welder with cast iron know how. Ed
64 rear diff cover
Collapse
X
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Ed-------
Theoretically, yes. However, personally, I'd never be confident in the durability of such a repair. If you don't plan on driving the car much and don't plan on any long trips, it might be worth a chance, though.
One thing to keep in mind: if the damage is nothing more than a hole without an adjacent crack, it can be repaired by brazing and I think this would be very durable. However, if a crack is present, that's when I would not be comfortable with any repair.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Thirty years ago I broke an ear off my diff cover when changing a spring. I welded the ear back on with the diff still in the car. I have changed spring once since then and the weld is still holding great.- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Russ------
Welds in cast iron usually do hold up very well. The main problem is usually cracks developing in areas of the native cast iron adjoining the weld. You may have gotten lucky, but this sort of thing is a very common problem with cast iron welds. Keep in mind that the rear cover is an integral part of the rear suspension of 63-82 Corvettes. The rear suspension is definitely a highly safety-related component of the car. I don't believe in compromising that safety for the sake of retaining an original component.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Ed,
A couple of thoughts; to repair the damage so it has a chance to hold, the cover has to be removed so it can be cleaned properly. A contaminated surface will never give you a usable weld.
it is my understanding, that date codes on rear end covers didn't exist until the 1970's. Not certain, that your cover is original to your car.
Marco- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
The early covers had a part number cast into them. I don't recall it but show it in my Diff rebuilding threads. The fill plug was different, it was larger and had machine threads. I believe '65 they switched to 3/4 npt plugs. I checked my stock but don't see any 63-64 covers left. A vette parts company will charge more then it's worth- IMO- so if you are going to drive the car and numbers are not that important buy a Muskegon HD cover and be done with it. I would be more concerned with the internals on that 64 diff. If original they were pretty sad, DANA posi's were bad, the pinions were also poorly designed and sheared. Now some one could have gone through it by now but if you drop the diff for the cover take a close look inside, if you're not sure what to look for again look up my thread or contact me and I'll go over it with you.
Gary- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
I think the 63-65 covers had a part # that ended with 303. Also, (not 100% sure) the 63 had a fine thread fill plug and the coarse thread plug was used on the 64-5 cover.- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Timothy------
Yes, the 63 to very early 65 cover was GM casting #3830303. All of these covers used a plug with a machine thread. Later cover used a plug with NPT thread.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
v
c
a
s- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Wayne------
Are you sure that plug is NPT thread? From what I can see of it, it looks more like machine thread to me.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Joe --- Did you have a chance to check the 3rd pic that I added in an edit ? Shows a mid-'64 cover with fine thread hole and plug (at the top), with the NPT plug from my late '65 "375" cover below it.- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Wayne------
Yes, I see it now; you must have added it after I posted. However, the very first picture you posted of the 3830303 cover looks to me like it has a machine thread plug, not an NPT. If so, I don't understand how it would be a hybrid.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: 64 rear diff cover
Hi Gary,
There has to be a sealing washer, on mine I had to buy a repro washer that in no way seals. If you have seen the correct washer in your comings and goings post it's size and material so I know what the original looks like.- Top
Comment
Comment