1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date? - NCRS Discussion Boards

1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dan H.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • July 31, 1977
    • 1365

    1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

    Just wondering how long an engine would sit after being assembled and stamped until it was painted. Minutes, hours, days? On FI engines, was the FI unit installed at engine assembly time or later prior to painting operation? Thanks for any insight from you 'old' guys!
    Dan
    1964 Red FI Coupe, DUNTOV '09
    Drove the 64 over 5000 miles to three Regionals and the San Jose National, one dust storm and 40 lbs of bugs!
  • William C.
    NCRS Past President
    • May 31, 1975
    • 6037

    #2
    Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

    Based on a tour of the plant I took about 1964, Minutes...Can't speak to FI, but I believe the baseplate had a mask over it (like the 340-365-350hp) engines.
    Bill Clupper #618

    Comment

    • Dan H.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • July 31, 1977
      • 1365

      #3
      Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

      Thanks Bill, guess my next question would be were they then pushed off to waiting storage areas and for how long? Already on order from St. Louis or just stockpiled? I went on a tour of the Mustang plant in Detroit in 1964, they really crank those components out. Walked next to a bare frame and saw them start it and drive it out of the plant. Maybe took an hour.
      1964 Red FI Coupe, DUNTOV '09
      Drove the 64 over 5000 miles to three Regionals and the San Jose National, one dust storm and 40 lbs of bugs!

      Comment

      • John H.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • November 30, 1997
        • 16513

        #4
        Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

        Originally posted by Dan Holstein (1440)
        guess my next question would be were they then pushed off to waiting storage areas and for how long? Already on order from St. Louis or just stockpiled? I went on a tour of the Mustang plant in Detroit in 1964, they really crank those components out. Walked next to a bare frame and saw them start it and drive it out of the plant. Maybe took an hour.
        Dan -

        Nothing was "stockpiled" at Flint V-8; 300 engines per hour (one every 12 seconds) came out the end, 18 hours a day, and they all went into racks that then went into rail cars. F.I. units were installed after engine painting. In contrast to the cabureted engines, St. Louis only installed a few small parts on F.I. engines.

        Comment

        • Terry M.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • September 30, 1980
          • 15573

          #5
          Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

          Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
          Dan -

          Nothing was "stockpiled" at Flint V-8; 300 engines per hour (one every 12 seconds) came out the end, 18 hours a day, and they all went into racks that then went into rail cars. F.I. units were installed after engine painting. In contrast to the cabureted engines, St. Louis only installed a few small parts on F.I. engines.
          John,
          Your Flint numbers are for both assembly lines, right?
          When I first visited, in the mid-1980s, they were running two V8 engine assembly lines. One was for injected engines and one for carbureted engines. Did they do it that way with the 1957 to 1965 injected engines?
          Terry

          Comment

          • Dan H.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • July 31, 1977
            • 1365

            #6
            Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

            Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
            Dan -

            Nothing was "stockpiled" at Flint V-8; 300 engines per hour (one every 12 seconds) came out the end, 18 hours a day, and they all went into racks that then went into rail cars. F.I. units were installed after engine painting. In contrast to the cabureted engines, St. Louis only installed a few small parts on F.I. engines.
            Thanks John, was the engine test run after the painting process? I'm under the impression the FI unit was installed for the test run. What all was on the engine for the test? Wish there was a picture of this proceedure. Thanks,
            Dan
            1964 Red FI Coupe, DUNTOV '09
            Drove the 64 over 5000 miles to three Regionals and the San Jose National, one dust storm and 40 lbs of bugs!

            Comment

            • Bob J.
              Very Frequent User
              • November 30, 1977
              • 713

              #7
              Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

              I don't claim to know originality on pre 63 cars but I've seen and owned 63s that had dull aluminum paint on nozzle blocks,idle tube hoses, FM pumps and on the very lowest portion of the fuel meter.
              In the 70s this was not a uncommon sight while judging Bloomington.
              Its usually never present on restored cars today.
              I asked Michael Hanson and he stated that he thought units were on and many times oversprayed with dull aluminum paint.
              Hanson went on to say that he has many parts showing the aluminum paint that were removed from low mileage 63-64 cars in the 70s.
              Bob J

              Comment

              • Dan H.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • July 31, 1977
                • 1365

                #8
                Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

                Thanks Bob, I know of another 64 owner who had silver over spray on his nozzle blocks. Looking at the AIM, it appears the distributor and its oil line to it, and drive cable were included in the Flint assembly due to no part numbers showing up as later St Louis assembly pieces.
                Dan
                1964 Red FI Coupe, DUNTOV '09
                Drove the 64 over 5000 miles to three Regionals and the San Jose National, one dust storm and 40 lbs of bugs!

                Comment

                • Alan D.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • December 31, 2004
                  • 2026

                  #9
                  Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

                  Just to support what Bob and Michael have said, my 64 FI has silver over spray on the nozzle blocks also. Do have some pictures but not available at present. Recall - I purchased my car around Aug 1967 and have talked to original owner (NCRS member) to confirm what had and had not been done - no repaint of silver paint.

                  Comment

                  • John H.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • November 30, 1997
                    • 16513

                    #10
                    Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

                    Originally posted by Terry McManmon (3966)
                    John,
                    Your Flint numbers are for both assembly lines, right?
                    When I first visited, in the mid-1980s, they were running two V8 engine assembly lines. One was for injected engines and one for carbureted engines. Did they do it that way with the 1957 to 1965 injected engines?
                    Terry -

                    In the 60's, there were two assembly lines at Flint V-8;, Line #1 ran at 170 per hour, and Line #2 ran at 130 per hour. Machining ran three shifts, assembly ran two. A buddy of mine ran the Piston Department, and I spent time at V-8 in '66 and '67, after Rochester F.I. had gone out of production - I never got to see the unique Rochester F.I. assembly and test process.

                    F.I. was a miniscule portion of daily production in '65 (3 per day out of 5,500 per day), and F.I. wasn't seen there again until the 80's.

                    Comment

                    • Terry M.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • September 30, 1980
                      • 15573

                      #11
                      Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

                      Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
                      Terry -

                      In the 60's, there were two assembly lines at Flint V-8;, Line #1 ran at 170 per hour, and Line #2 ran at 130 per hour. Machining ran three shifts, assembly ran two. A buddy of mine ran the Piston Department, and I spent time at V-8 in '66 and '67, after Rochester F.I. had gone out of production - I never got to see the unique Rochester F.I. assembly and test process.

                      F.I. was a miniscule portion of daily production in '65 (3 per day out of 5,500 per day), and F.I. wasn't seen there again until the 80's.
                      Thanks John.
                      I have read your posts about the piston department and the select fitting of pistons and rod bearings. The synchronicity of the select fit process in those pre-computer days was a remarkable achievement.
                      Terry

                      Comment

                      • Rick A.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • July 31, 2002
                        • 2147

                        #12
                        Re: 1963, 64 HP engine build date lag to painting date?

                        Agree with Messrs Hanson and Jorjorian - many of the unrestored/unmolested/original cars noted to-date show evidence of aluminum paint on nozzle blocks, idle tube hoses, pumps
                        Rick Aleshire
                        2016 Ebony C7R Z06 "ROSA"

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        Searching...Please wait.
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                        Search Result for "|||"