Gaskets for AFB on '63 340 - NCRS Discussion Boards

Gaskets for AFB on '63 340

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Peter Ansted - #32760

    Gaskets for AFB on '63 340

    The rebuild kit for the AFB carb contains 3 gaskets for use between carb and manifold. The assembly manual is not clear on which gaskets to use. Your suggestions are always appreciated.
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43211

    #2
    Re: Gaskets for AFB on '63 340

    Peter----

    The gasket has 4 equal size holes and NO heat groove (as do the 300 hp gasket). If it's totally of original configuration, it will have a small rectangular "tab" on the front of the gasket.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43211

      #3
      Re: Gaskets for AFB on '63 340

      Peter----

      The gasket has 4 equal size holes and NO heat groove (as do the 300 hp gasket). If it's totally of original configuration, it will have a small rectangular "tab" on the front of the gasket.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Dale Pearman

        #4
        I Disagree

        The secondary holes are a tad larger.

        The 300 Hp gasket set consisted of a galvanized heat shield, chaneled phonelic spacer and chaneled gasket.

        Dale.

        Comment

        • Dale Pearman

          #5
          I Disagree

          The secondary holes are a tad larger.

          The 300 Hp gasket set consisted of a galvanized heat shield, chaneled phonelic spacer and chaneled gasket.

          Dale.

          Comment

          • Duke W.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • January 1, 1993
            • 15660

            #6
            Here's my take on the deal

            The gasket I have for my 340 has slighly larger secondary openings to match the the AFB's larger secondary throttle bores, which are 1 11/16" versus the 1 9/16" primaries. The 340 HP gasket is unique to that engine configuration as it has no heat riser slot.

            As Dale said, the 300 HP configuration consisted of a gasket with a heat riser slot, phenolic insulator (with a heat riser opening, matching the gasket plan form), and a stainless steel shim (without the heat riser slot as it acted at a heat shield to protect the the aluminum carburetor body from direct exhaust gas heat), which should be installed in that order, bottom to top.

            Duke

            Comment

            • Duke W.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • January 1, 1993
              • 15660

              #7
              Here's my take on the deal

              The gasket I have for my 340 has slighly larger secondary openings to match the the AFB's larger secondary throttle bores, which are 1 11/16" versus the 1 9/16" primaries. The 340 HP gasket is unique to that engine configuration as it has no heat riser slot.

              As Dale said, the 300 HP configuration consisted of a gasket with a heat riser slot, phenolic insulator (with a heat riser opening, matching the gasket plan form), and a stainless steel shim (without the heat riser slot as it acted at a heat shield to protect the the aluminum carburetor body from direct exhaust gas heat), which should be installed in that order, bottom to top.

              Duke

              Comment

              • Dale Pearman

                #8
                Re: Here's my take on the deal

                Glad you agree Duke. Are you sure the heat shield was aluminum (good heat conductor)? Mine are galvanized steel.

                Dale.

                Comment

                • Dale Pearman

                  #9
                  Re: Here's my take on the deal

                  Glad you agree Duke. Are you sure the heat shield was aluminum (good heat conductor)? Mine are galvanized steel.

                  Dale.

                  Comment

                  • Dale Pearman

                    #10
                    Correction

                    I meant stainless not aluminum. As I said I've only encountered galvanized steel in my travels.

                    Dale.

                    Comment

                    • Dale Pearman

                      #11
                      Correction

                      I meant stainless not aluminum. As I said I've only encountered galvanized steel in my travels.

                      Dale.

                      Comment

                      • Duke W.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • January 1, 1993
                        • 15660

                        #12
                        Re: Correction

                        Now you've got me thinking, Dale. Back in the seventies I bought a new 3721S carb from a parts store, and it came with the 300 HP gasket and a galvanized steel heat shield. Sometime before that I bought a gasket, insulator, and spacer from GMPD (I was thinking of adapting the insulator to my 340 engine).

                        I'm pretty sure the GMPD spacer was stainless. Unfortunately,I'm not exactly sure wherre it is right now.

                        The insultor won't fit on a 340 due to hood clearance issues.

                        Duke

                        Comment

                        • Duke W.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • January 1, 1993
                          • 15660

                          #13
                          Re: Correction

                          Now you've got me thinking, Dale. Back in the seventies I bought a new 3721S carb from a parts store, and it came with the 300 HP gasket and a galvanized steel heat shield. Sometime before that I bought a gasket, insulator, and spacer from GMPD (I was thinking of adapting the insulator to my 340 engine).

                          I'm pretty sure the GMPD spacer was stainless. Unfortunately,I'm not exactly sure wherre it is right now.

                          The insultor won't fit on a 340 due to hood clearance issues.

                          Duke

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"