Technical Question..
65 350HP engine - Presently set up with a Lazer Cam installed. Lazer Cams is a division of Campower Inc. out of Memphis, TN. Have a cut sheet on the specific cam and it reads as follows:
Engine Chevy 262-400 V8
Grind----2700116
Duration: Intake Exhaust
adv. @ .006 270 275
@ .050 T.L. 220 225
Lobe Lift .310 .307
Gross Lift .465 .460
Valve Lash .000 .000
Lobe Center Separation 108
Install Cam at Intake Lobe Centerline of 104
Would appreciate it if someone could tell me how this cam profile stacks up against the original cam that came in an L-79. Is this a good cam, bad cam, average cam, not wurfa, etc. Would like to determine if this is a radical change/departure from the original cam that came in the car.
If it's a "not wurfa" it's not gonna impact anything, just interested in why this particular cam might have been chosen over original. Compression Ratio is also lowered to 10.5-1 with hardened valve seats.
Thanks,
Rick #13174
65 350HP engine - Presently set up with a Lazer Cam installed. Lazer Cams is a division of Campower Inc. out of Memphis, TN. Have a cut sheet on the specific cam and it reads as follows:
Engine Chevy 262-400 V8
Grind----2700116
Duration: Intake Exhaust
adv. @ .006 270 275
@ .050 T.L. 220 225
Lobe Lift .310 .307
Gross Lift .465 .460
Valve Lash .000 .000
Lobe Center Separation 108
Install Cam at Intake Lobe Centerline of 104
Would appreciate it if someone could tell me how this cam profile stacks up against the original cam that came in an L-79. Is this a good cam, bad cam, average cam, not wurfa, etc. Would like to determine if this is a radical change/departure from the original cam that came in the car.
If it's a "not wurfa" it's not gonna impact anything, just interested in why this particular cam might have been chosen over original. Compression Ratio is also lowered to 10.5-1 with hardened valve seats.
Thanks,
Rick #13174
Comment