Rear Crossmember Mount bushings 63 - NCRS Discussion Boards

Rear Crossmember Mount bushings 63

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike M.
    Expired
    • September 30, 1999
    • 710

    Rear Crossmember Mount bushings 63

    They usually take a prybar to get the crossmember down. Would some grease on the cups work to make removal easier when installing or would something else work better? Any sugestions?
    Thanks Mike
  • Chuck R.
    Expired
    • April 30, 1999
    • 1434

    #2
    Re: Rear Crossmember Mount bushings 63

    I contacted a Permatex rep who confirmed that their anti seize compounds would not degrade the rubber mounts if applied liberally on them.

    Chuck

    Comment

    • John H.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • December 1, 1997
      • 16513

      #3
      Re: Rear Crossmember Mount bushings 63

      Mike -

      Not a problem - I use anti-seize on the steel cup in the new bushings before bolting it back up so they'll separate easily the next time it has to come apart. Not an issue, as the contact between the bushing cup and the "sombrero" formation on the frame is metal-to-metal; no rubber involved in that joint.




      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Wayne M.
        Expired
        • March 1, 1980
        • 6414

        #4
        TSB on this subject

        Link to 2nd page with installation notes for Diff X-member.


        Note # 2 says to use chassis grease on the sombreros. Anti-seize should be OK; I've used (electrical) silicone grease.

        BTW, do torque to the revised higher values (Note # 4: 55-65 ft.lbs), and not the earlier published numbers found in the AIM and service manuals.

        Im curious to know if the '67 AIM finally had the correct higher numbers.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • John H.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • December 1, 1997
          • 16513

          #5
          Re: TSB on this subject

          Wayne -

          The torque on those bolts shows as 55-65 in the '67 A.I.M., and was changed from 20-30 to 55-65 on 9/65 in the '66 A.I.M.

          Comment

          • Wayne M.
            Expired
            • March 1, 1980
            • 6414

            #6
            Thanks, John ....

            ... glad they got that passed on to assembly line without delay.

            I suppose, theoretically, you could even leave the bolts out entirely, as long as you didn't get airborne, or jack the rear up with the diff unsupported.

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"