66 L79 belt question. How many? - NCRS Discussion Boards

66 L79 belt question. How many?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gary B.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • February 1, 1997
    • 7014

    #16
    Patrick; I think outside is where...

    the captive belt should be. I believe it's the only way the alternator pulley will line up correctly. So that's why I said something is fishy about the photo in Noland's book. I agree that in the Noland photo the captive belt looks to be on the block-side set of pulleys, not the radiator side as is shown in the other photo.

    Gary

    Comment

    • Gary B.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • February 1, 1997
      • 7014

      #17
      Meant to say "Wayne's photo from Noland" for

      the block side captive belt config. What year car is the engine in the photo you posted? It has the engine disp on the air cleaner lid, so it's not a '66 (or '67?).

      Gary

      Comment

      • Patrick T.
        Expired
        • September 30, 1999
        • 1286

        #18
        Re: Meant to say "Wayne's photo from Noland" for

        Gary, the picture is of a '67 L-79 in Noland Adams Volume II on page 421. PT

        Comment

        • Gary B.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • February 1, 1997
          • 7014

          #19
          '67 L79 with captive belt

          Patrick,

          So why doesn't that photo suggest to the revision team that two belts were used on L79 cars with no other options that influenced the number of V belts? A question with no answer perhaps.

          Gary

          Comment

          • Patrick T.
            Expired
            • September 30, 1999
            • 1286

            #20
            Re: '67 L79 with captive belt

            Gary, the '67 Judging Manual states that all L-79 crankshaft and water pump pulley's shall be double groove. I don't know what the '66 JM says, but Noland says in his book the '66 and '67 L-79's were basically the same. PT

            Comment

            • Gary B.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • February 1, 1997
              • 7014

              #21
              Patrick; pulleys aren't the issue

              Patrick,

              No on disputes the fact that '66 and '67 L79 cars w/o PS or A/C used double pulleys. The only question is was there one V belt or two, i.e., was one pulley track empty. I and others don't think so, but we can't "prove" it to everyone's satisfaction.

              Gary

              Comment

              • Brian G.
                Infrequent User
                • May 31, 2006
                • 19

                #22
                Based on what I've read here....

                I'm leaving the 2 belts on and will see how it judges. I printed that pic from Noland's book showing the captive belt on the outside, thats how my car is configured. If I do not succeed in convincing (if necessary), then I'll take the point hit and go from there. It appears to be worth 4 and 4 for a total of 8pts. Hopefully would get at least some credit.

                Thanks, Brian

                Comment

                • Gary B.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • February 1, 1997
                  • 7014

                  #23
                  Brian; please let us know how it judges

                  Are you talking about the National in Boston this summer?

                  Comment

                  • Mark G.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • March 1, 2001
                    • 227

                    #24
                    (Message Deleted by Poster)

                    Message Deleted by Poster

                    Comment

                    • Jean C.
                      Expired
                      • June 30, 2003
                      • 688

                      #25
                      Re: 66 L79 belt question. How many?

                      Looking at the one belt/two belt, inner pulley/outer pulley scenario, it is agreed that the captive belt is a back up to the belt driving the alternator and water pump. Strictly from a design standpoint, on which pulley would it be best for the captive belt to run; i.e., less chance of getting kicked off the pulleys by a broken alternator belt.
                      Charlie

                      Comment

                      • Gary B.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • February 1, 1997
                        • 7014

                        #26
                        Mark, it's so small I can read anything

                        Is there anyway you can post a large, higher resolution image?

                        Comment

                        • Joe L.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • February 1, 1988
                          • 43205

                          #27
                          Re: Joe....

                          Brian-----

                          That's it.
                          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                          Comment

                          • Mark G.
                            Very Frequent User
                            • March 1, 2001
                            • 227

                            #28
                            This may be better *NM*

                            Comment

                            • Joe L.
                              Beyond Control Poster
                              • February 1, 1988
                              • 43205

                              #29
                              Re: Joe, where does GM say "two belts were used"?

                              Gary-----

                              The 1967 and subsequent P&A Catalogs are some of the places. Don't forget, these catalogs are developed using PRODUCTION information.
                              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                              Comment

                              • Gary B.
                                Extremely Frequent Poster
                                • February 1, 1997
                                • 7014

                                #30
                                It looks the same to me. Can anyone else view it? *NM*

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                Searching...Please wait.
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                Search Result for "|||"