1967 427/435 and F-41 Suspension - NCRS Discussion Boards

1967 427/435 and F-41 Suspension

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard J.
    Frequent User
    • August 31, 2005
    • 83

    1967 427/435 and F-41 Suspension

    I need to know the facts about the F-41 Suspension... Was the F-41 suspension required on L-71 equipped cars? I don't think so because the numbers in the black book don't add up the same and I have seen a car's tank sheet and it was a 435hp car and no F-41 was on the build sheet. I have several people telling me that F-41 was required like the K-66 when L-71 was ordered... I don't believe it and would like to hear from you all. Thanks, Rick
    Rick Jones
    Albuquerque, NM
    Member #44319
  • William L.
    Very Frequent User
    • December 1, 1988
    • 944

    #2
    Re: 1967 427/435 and F-41 Suspension

    Rick
    It was not required. My L71 does not have F-41 and I have the paper work to back it up.
    Bill
    Bill Lacy
    1967 427/435 National Top Flight Bloomington Gold
    1998 Indy Pacecar

    Comment

    • Robert K.
      Very Frequent User
      • June 30, 2001
      • 212

      #3
      Re: 1967 427/435 and F-41 Suspension

      Rick,

      I have a L-71 with the F-41 suspension but it was an option that was ordered. It was not required.

      Bob

      Comment

      • Duke W.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 1, 1993
        • 15643

        #4
        Re: 1967 427/435 and F-41 Suspension

        F-41 was not required on L-71 or L-71/L-89. Same goes for J-56, and M-22. Together these are the "Heavy Duty Options" that were intended for serious racers.

        However, F-41, J-56, and M-22 were ONLY AVAILABLE with the above engine options and REQUIRED on L-88 along with C-48 Heater Delete. L-88 was referred to as the Heavy Duty 427.

        K-66 was not a HD option. It was required with all SHP and HD 427s and was also available with all Corvette engine options in those two years. The operative word here being "options". I was not available with the base 300 HP engine.

        Same in '66 - the HD options were only available with L-72.

        ...made it pretty clear where the new racing emphasis was, and L-88 was not meant to be your daily commuter car.

        The other options associated with racing were C-48 Heater Delete and N-03 36.5 gallon gasoline tank. AFAIK C-48 could be ordered on any Corvette except C-60, and N-03 was available on any Coupe without restriction.

        No radio option was available with L-88, but this is NOT "radio delete" because base models did not have a radio as standard equipement, so a no-radio Corvette of this era is simply "no radio option" , not "radio delete".

        The other question this raises is: Could a radio be ordered with L-71 or L-71/89 that had the HD options?

        Anyone care to take this one on?

        Duke

        Comment

        • Kent K.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • December 1, 1982
          • 1139

          #5
          OK, I'll bite. The answer is YES

          A radio could be ordered with L-71 or L-71/89 that had the HD options.
          Kent #6201
          Kent
          1967 327/300 Convert. w/ Air - Duntoved in 1994
          1969 427/435 Coupe - 1 previous owner
          2006 Coupe - Driver & Fun Car !!!
          NCM Founder - Member #718

          Comment

          • Duke W.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • January 1, 1993
            • 15643

            #6
            Re: OK, I'll bite. The answer is YES

            I agree. L-88 was intended specifically for racing, so Chevrolet did not design a RFI package for the L-88, which precluded installation of a radio as a factory option. There was a RFI package for SHP, so there was no technical reason why a radio could not be ordered with L-72, L-71 or L-71/89 regardless of the presence of the HD options.

            Duke

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"