1972 CORVETTE CO1 BUILD DATE - NCRS Discussion Boards

1972 CORVETTE CO1 BUILD DATE

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Don C.
    Expired
    • July 31, 2005
    • 20

    1972 CORVETTE CO1 BUILD DATE

    TRIM TAG SHOWS CAR BUILD DATE IS CO1. WHAT WOULD BE THE LATEST ACCEPTABLE CASTING DATE FOR THE ENGINE TO MEET NCRS STANDARDS?
  • Michael W.
    Expired
    • April 1, 1997
    • 4290

    #2
    Re: 1972 CORVETTE CO1 BUILD DATE

    NO NEED TO SHOUT, we're all not deaf

    If by 'latest' you mean closest to car trim tag date, it would be difficult to explain an engine cylinder case that was cast, assembled, shipped from either Flint or Tonawanda and then installed in less than a few days time.

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43209

      #3
      Re: 1972 CORVETTE CO1 BUILD DATE

      Don-----

      I would say March 31, 1972 would be the latest date for either the casting or the engine assembly date.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Michael W.
        Expired
        • April 1, 1997
        • 4290

        #4
        Re: 1972 CORVETTE CO1 BUILD DATE

        Joe,

        'C' is October 1971 for 1972 M/Y cars. Did you mean Sept. 30th 1971 instead?

        Comment

        • Harmon C.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • August 31, 1994
          • 3228

          #5
          Re: 1972 CORVETTE CO1 BUILD DATE

          For this model year I would say Sept 23 would be the last I would use. I have seen very few less than seven days from casting to instalation.
          Lyle
          Lyle

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43209

            #6
            Re: 1972 CORVETTE CO1 BUILD DATE

            Mike------

            Yes, I blew it entirely. I did recognize C as being October, 1971 for the 1972 models. Why on earth I said March 1972 for the engine is beyond me; it's utterly absurd. Anyway, what I should have said was a date as EARLY as April 1, 1971 would be acceptable under the "6 month rule". However, they would not have been building 1972 model year engines that early, so I don't know how that would figure into it all.

            As far as I know, an engine assembly date as LATE as the day prior to the car's build date (not necessarily the same as the body build date) would conform to the guidelines, but I'm certainly not well versed on these sorts of things. The norm would be an engine assembled 2-4 weeks prior to the car's build date.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"