1964 roadster, camshaft condition - NCRS Discussion Boards

1964 roadster, camshaft condition

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Donald B.
    Expired
    • June 30, 2006
    • 5

    1964 roadster, camshaft condition

    I have a GM camshaft stamped 2182 which I have never used. I removed it from the short block #3959512 pad CE5N2 99 I bought in 1975 along with heads 3991492 and i want to put the cam back in. Im assuming that this cam is a LT1 which i want to use in this engine. It's not rusty but has some marks on the bearing surface that i can feel with my fingernail. Any advice on whether to use this cam (31 yrs old) or purchase a Sealed Power or Crane grind. Also, Ive read that there is a method to set the lash for the camshaft, and what intake would be a good match, dual plane or single plane? I know this is not the correct engine for my car, its a driver. This site has been a tremendous help in bringing my car back alive after sitting way too long. thanks
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 1, 1993
    • 15645

    #2
    Re: 1964 roadster, camshaft condition

    Yes, that's a LT-1 cam. You can polish the journals to remove any upset material. If the defects are below the surface, they should not be a problem.

    Single plan manifolds don't make road friendly torque bandwidth. Use a dual plane.

    I don't have access to the Hinckley/Williams paper on adjusting valves right now. Perhaps someone who has it handy can volunteer to e-mail it to you.

    The latest revision is December, 2005.

    Duke

    Comment

    • Duke W.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • January 1, 1993
      • 15645

      #3
      Re: 1964 roadster, camshaft condition

      Yes, that's a LT-1 cam. You can polish the journals to remove any upset material. If the defects are below the surface, they should not be a problem.

      Single plan manifolds don't make road friendly torque bandwidth. Use a dual plane.

      I don't have access to the Hinckley/Williams paper on adjusting valves right now. Perhaps someone who has it handy can volunteer to e-mail it to you.

      The latest revision is December, 2005.

      Duke

      Comment

      Working...
      Searching...Please wait.
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
      There are no results that meet this criteria.
      Search Result for "|||"