C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not? - NCRS Discussion Boards

C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gerard F.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • June 30, 2004
    • 3805

    C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not?

    Do you think the 67 S/B front springs in the picture below are worth refurbing and putting back on the car. I had them replaced with grand touring springs about 2 years ago as the shop thought I had a little sag.


    The springs measure 16 5/8" and seem to have just a light coat of rust on them. I assume they were just natural finish as all I see is rust. Are these springs shorter then new stock ones, and do they lose their resiliency over time. Is there a way of testing them?

    The springs still have the tape tags on them (one is intact).


    The green tape has the part number 3851100 followed by ED and repeated on the tape.

    If it is worth it to reuse these springs, should I just beadblast, wire brush or do something else.

    Having fun,

    Jerry Fuccillo
    #42179
    Attached Files
    Jerry Fuccillo
    1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968
  • Donald T.
    Expired
    • September 30, 2002
    • 1319

    #2
    Re: C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not?

    Jerry,

    They look in very nice condition to me, but I don't know about metal fatigue. I can tell you that I have a set of NOS springs (GM 3851100), and they also measure 16 5/8". So they have not compressed over the years, but I don't know how they would compare under load. I think original springs sit a little lower in front than replacements and that may make someone think they are starting to sag.

    Don Terry

    Comment

    • Kent K.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • December 1, 1982
      • 1139

      #3
      Re: C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not?

      Jerry,

      They appear very much the same as mine did. I bead blasted them, shot them with Coricone, a parafin based clear coating, put the tags on and installed them. My '67 may appear ever so slightly lower in front than stock, but it has its original springs. BTW, our '67s are almost cousins ... same engine, tranny, color and interior ... don't know if yours is A/C.

      Regards,
      Kent #6201
      Kent
      1967 327/300 Convert. w/ Air - Duntoved in 1994
      1969 427/435 Coupe - 1 previous owner
      2006 Coupe - Driver & Fun Car !!!
      NCM Founder - Member #718

      Comment

      • Barbara S.
        Very Frequent User
        • April 30, 1981
        • 599

        #4
        Re: C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not?

        Hey Jerry. Yours look just like mine did. I media blasted mine, cleared them and then reintalled them. They look great and so will yours. You can buy the correct green tags too. Why buy new when yours will look great!

        Tony

        Comment

        • Joe L.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • February 1, 1988
          • 43205

          #5
          Re: C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not?

          Jerry-----

          The GM "convention" used for measuring spring free length changed over the years. So, you will find various specifcations for the GM #3851100. However, using the length measurement protocol that's most intuitive, as you have done, the GM spec for the spring is 16.82". So, you are within less than 1/4" of that. Given the fact that the springs show little corrosion and no damaging corrosion, I would say that the springs are fine for re-use.
          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

          Comment

          • Eugene B.
            Very Frequent User
            • May 31, 1988
            • 710

            #6
            Re: C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not?

            Jerry,
            As a cleaning technique, see if there is a rebuilder in your area that has a shot peen cabinet. I used this machine to do all of my front ended (and everything but the trailing arms in the rear). Shot peening leaves a more natural finish than sand blasting, etc.

            After shot peening, I had the rebuilder dip them in their industrial rust preventive, applied new stickers, and reinstalled them. You can also use a product like PreLube 6.

            I marked mine top and bottom; and left and right, just to be sure that I put them back the way they came out. Be safe when you reinstall.

            Good luck with your restoration.

            Regards,
            Gene

            Comment

            • Bill Stephenson

              #7
              Re: C2:67 Front Springs, Refurb or not?

              -----Whats the problem, Jerry??? Arent all California cars low-riders??? Thats all us easterners ever seem to see in pics almost anywhere........Bill S

              Comment

              • Gerard F.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • June 30, 2004
                • 3805

                #8
                I got gas shocks, too

                on a Pennsylvania car. (but now in CA)

                Actually Bill,

                The reason I changed the suspension in the front was that with new P205/75R15 radials I had a slight tire rub on the front. I eventually found that the rub was more related to a bend in the front bumper brace. Fixed that and no more rub.

                Now I'd like to go back to my original springs, and if I can find some, original spec shocks. Do you know where I can find any, or is there a correct substitute?

                Cheers,

                Jerry Fuccillo
                #42179

                PS How did you like your buckle tops in the Restorer.
                Jerry Fuccillo
                1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968

                Comment

                • Bill Stephenson

                  #9
                  Re: I got gas shocks, too

                  ------Oh, Those were mine??? Well,,,They became yours when they left my doorstep, but they looked OK!!! Im glad they were a help to you.........Bill S

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  Searching...Please wait.
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                  There are no results that meet this criteria.
                  Search Result for "|||"