C2: Rear Sway Bar on 67 Small Block - NCRS Discussion Boards

C2: Rear Sway Bar on 67 Small Block

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gerard F.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • June 30, 2004
    • 3805

    #61
    Re: MPH and RPM calculator

    Scott,

    I don't think that the Michelin 195/70vr15 is the right one. I found my original 1969 receipt and guarantee booklet, and they are shown as Michelin 195-15 XWW. The booklet also shows a 70 series, although the 195-15 XWW is listed under the Metric Radial column.

    The tires I had were actually accepted as snow tires in most states.
    Prices sure change, $282.00 each! I paid $46.00 each in 1969. In 1975, I changed them to the same tire and paid $60.33 each.

    It's interesting that 29 years later, I brought them back to the same shop with less then 3000 miles on them, and they wouldn't honor the 40,000 mile guarantee.
    See what happens when you get married!

    I went to Coker Redline Radials P205/75R15 just recently. They have a 27.1" diameter and are probably near the metric 195-15 tire.

    I'm sure there is an unkown tire inflation and thread factor in RPM vs MPH calculation, so I'll probably never know the true speed. I think the 135 MPH at 5300 RPM is in the ballpark.

    Jerry
    Jerry Fuccillo
    1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968

    Comment

    • Mike Cobine

      #62
      Re: MPH and RPM calculator

      If you still have those tires mounted on wheels, put one on the car, chalk mark it and the ground. Roll the car forward until the mark is on the ground again. Mark the ground and measure between the marks.

      There is fair room for error, but it is close enough. Take that and divide by 3.14159.

      Comment

      • Mike Cobine

        #63
        Re: MPH and RPM calculator

        If you still have those tires mounted on wheels, put one on the car, chalk mark it and the ground. Roll the car forward until the mark is on the ground again. Mark the ground and measure between the marks.

        There is fair room for error, but it is close enough. Take that and divide by 3.14159.

        Comment

        • Gerard F.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • June 30, 2004
          • 3805

          #64
          Re: MPH and RPM calculator

          Mike,

          Never though of that, and I'm an engineer. Simple geometry! Thanks.
          But the tires were gone with the new ones.

          Jerry
          Jerry Fuccillo
          1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968

          Comment

          • Gerard F.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • June 30, 2004
            • 3805

            #65
            Re: MPH and RPM calculator

            Mike,

            Never though of that, and I'm an engineer. Simple geometry! Thanks.
            But the tires were gone with the new ones.

            Jerry
            Jerry Fuccillo
            1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"