Re: nope....
Thx Clem and George....so my polylocks have the set screw head about 1/8" recessed in the body of the polylock. I guess the point you are making is the thread engagement in the polylock for the set screw is too little and the lock screws are too deep in the polylock if you use shorter studs. I honestly can't recall if I used GM studs or ARP studs but I may have used GM. I believe I dressed the face of the studs with a belt sander to obtain a flat face for the setscrew. I will have to check. The only way I could fit the stock covers was to shorten the polylock overall length, to let the hex portion drop down closer to the stud. Again, all the setscrews are recessed in the polylocks. My cam is a stock LS6 3143/4362 GM unit that came in the crate engine, has .496 lift exclusive of the clearance loss, GM specs it at .520 I think. Hopefully this is OK, the engine has two hours of run time and is not installed in a vehicle yet. Thx!....Craig
Thx Clem and George....so my polylocks have the set screw head about 1/8" recessed in the body of the polylock. I guess the point you are making is the thread engagement in the polylock for the set screw is too little and the lock screws are too deep in the polylock if you use shorter studs. I honestly can't recall if I used GM studs or ARP studs but I may have used GM. I believe I dressed the face of the studs with a belt sander to obtain a flat face for the setscrew. I will have to check. The only way I could fit the stock covers was to shorten the polylock overall length, to let the hex portion drop down closer to the stud. Again, all the setscrews are recessed in the polylocks. My cam is a stock LS6 3143/4362 GM unit that came in the crate engine, has .496 lift exclusive of the clearance loss, GM specs it at .520 I think. Hopefully this is OK, the engine has two hours of run time and is not installed in a vehicle yet. Thx!....Craig
Comment