69 frame stencil , vehicle was produced via build plate D25.
i read this as a car produced November 68 on the 25th day.
this is a convertable 435,427 , stick car
the frame stencil was not legible
now after referring to a book by bizzoco , he states in the frame section that a car from this date should have a 3973880 - ? is this correct and he states it should be 3/4 in # is this correct and what should - aos # be or the lot # to be correct.
Next Joseph a Tripoli Jr states that the # should read 3973880- ?
and the # S SHOULD be 1"
How do you find out the correct #s , from a judge
I would think that both these gentleman have a great knowledge of the cars
i just have not yet found all the answers.
i have recently seen a vehicle with 3949093- 63 and was not able to find this # in either of these books but did see something in the assembly manual for 69
this particular car had a build of 2.10.69
next how is the stencil printed 3949093-69
2.10.69
or 3949093-63
2.10.69
i read this as a car produced November 68 on the 25th day.
this is a convertable 435,427 , stick car
the frame stencil was not legible
now after referring to a book by bizzoco , he states in the frame section that a car from this date should have a 3973880 - ? is this correct and he states it should be 3/4 in # is this correct and what should - aos # be or the lot # to be correct.
Next Joseph a Tripoli Jr states that the # should read 3973880- ?
and the # S SHOULD be 1"
How do you find out the correct #s , from a judge
I would think that both these gentleman have a great knowledge of the cars
i just have not yet found all the answers.
i have recently seen a vehicle with 3949093- 63 and was not able to find this # in either of these books but did see something in the assembly manual for 69
this particular car had a build of 2.10.69
next how is the stencil printed 3949093-69
2.10.69
or 3949093-63
2.10.69
Comment