C2 Camshaft Pricing - NCRS Discussion Boards

C2 Camshaft Pricing

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mark H.
    Very Frequent User
    • July 31, 1998
    • 384

    C2 Camshaft Pricing

    I've been pricing out the components for the rebuild of my engine ('64 327/300)and am puzzled by some camshaft prices. On the GM site a camshaft kit is listed, bluprinted cam made by Crane with 16 tappits for about $120 (part #12364051). When I price the lifters alone, though, the price is over $70 (part #12371044). Are they different lifters than come with the kit? If not, something seems wrong to me - that would make the cam only $50. The cheepest I've seen it for alone is aobut $100. What am I missing?
  • John H.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • December 1, 1997
    • 16513

    #2
    Re: C2 Camshaft Pricing

    The cam number comes up for me as just the camshaft (no "kit" with lifters); the lifters show separately under their own number for about $60.00.

    Comment

    • Tom B.
      Very Frequent User
      • March 1, 1978
      • 720

      #3

      Comment

      • Mark H.
        Very Frequent User
        • July 31, 1998
        • 384

        #4
        Re: C2 327/300 Camshaft

        Thanks for the info. I've never seen a 3733431 cam for sale. Is there a source for this or is 3896929 the way to go?

        Comment

        • John H.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • December 1, 1997
          • 16513

          #5
          Re: C2 327/300 Camshaft

          I'd use the "929" - it was used from '67 through at least '81, has great low-end torque.

          Comment

          • Duke W.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • January 1, 1993
            • 15649

            #6
            Re: C2 327/300 Camshaft

            The 929 has been the service replacement for the 3733431 as long as I can remember and should essentially duplicate the characteristicc of the 431, but is probably an improvement as Chevrolet learned a lot about valve train dynamics and volumetric efficiency in the sixties. A dual pattern design is proper for a SB because of the relatively restrictive exhaust relative to the inlet port. A bit more exhaust duration usually works better.

            Like John said, it has gobs of low end torque and a silky smooth 500 RPM idle and is considered "The 300 HP cam."

            Duke

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"