Source for flat capped u-joints - NCRS Discussion Boards

Source for flat capped u-joints

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • William B.
    Very Frequent User
    • April 30, 1975
    • 939

    Source for flat capped u-joints

    Looking for a source for flat capped u-joints , like the original equipment was. judging manuals call for these on rear half shafts and driveshaft.
  • Brian M.
    Very Frequent User
    • October 31, 1994
    • 119

    #2
    Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

    Originally posted by William Bryan (291)
    Looking for a source for flat capped u-joints , like the original equipment was. judging manuals call for these on rear half shafts and driveshaft.
    Bill,

    I was able to source flat cap universal joints w/o grease fittings for the half shafts from Paragon (#5728). I called them and had the customer service person pull them to confirm.

    I was unable to get flat cap universal joints w/o grease fittings for the drive shafts, so I settled for the Paragon (#5724). The customer service person did look.

    See you in June!
    Regards,
    Brian McIntyre

    Comment

    • Tony S.
      NCRS Vice President, Director Region VII & 10
      • April 30, 1981
      • 975

      #3
      Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

      William, we really can't see the U-joints in the drive shaft, so just get the U-joints for the half shafts. There are 16 caps in the half shafts, so it is a meaningful part of the half shaft judging (configuration). Stepped caps get a 1-point deduction from the 65 and 66 chassis judges. I can't speak for the 63, 64 or 67 teams. Hope that helps. Tony
      Region VII Director (serving members in Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas).
      Original member of the Kansas City Chapter, est'd 07/11/1982.
      Member: 1965 and 1966 National Judging Teams
      Judging Chairman--Kansas City Chapter.
      Co-Editor of the 1965 TIM and JG, 6th and 7th editions.

      Comment

      • Joseph S.
        National Judging Chairman
        • February 28, 1985
        • 847

        #4
        Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

        Let's do the math. 5 points for Driveshaft and Half Shaft assemblies. How are we splitting up the points between 2 1/2 shafts, 2 Yokes, 1 Drive shaft. 6 UJoints, 52 pieces of hardware(nuts, straps, locks)?

        Comment

        • Tony S.
          NCRS Vice President, Director Region VII & 10
          • April 30, 1981
          • 975

          #5
          Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

          1 point Joe. Some features have greater weight than others. It is not just 52 divided by whatever. You have to weigh the importance of the components. U-Joints aren't just "hardware". There are 16 caps and make up a pretty major part of the line item.

          Let me make my point by this example: how many components in a 5-point lower A-arm? You have the large steel A-arm itself, the cross shaft, the two bushings, the ball joint, the cotter pin, the nut and washer on top of the ball joint, the zerk, the two rivets, the rubber bumper, the two bolts that attach the bumper to the A-arm. Did I miss anything? That's about 12 items. So each of these represents 1 of 12. The ball joint rivets should be natural, right? If the two rivets are painted black, that is only a minor finish deviation but too small to deduct for a 1-point finish deduction on a 5-point item. Right? Change the example: let's say that everything is typical factory, but the steel A-arm itself is unpainted (should be gloss black). The steel A-arm itself is still only 1/12 of the line item by your analysis. But if the steel A-arm itself is unpainted, then the proper deduction is 1 for finish because that one item is the major component even though it is 1/12 of the entire assembly by your math analysis.

          The point is this: sometimes you have to weigh the components by importance. It isn't always just add up the components and divide. It often is, but not always.
          Region VII Director (serving members in Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas).
          Original member of the Kansas City Chapter, est'd 07/11/1982.
          Member: 1965 and 1966 National Judging Teams
          Judging Chairman--Kansas City Chapter.
          Co-Editor of the 1965 TIM and JG, 6th and 7th editions.

          Comment

          • Joseph S.
            National Judging Chairman
            • February 28, 1985
            • 847

            #6
            Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

            We've taken this thread off the intended path. The original thread was for a source for flat caps. I was just trying to show Bill that there is not that much weight given to "just the Caps" on the entire 1/2 shaft assembly. Most judges will just write him a note and let him know about the proper caps.

            Comment

            • Harry S.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • July 31, 2002
              • 5267

              #7
              Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

              Yep, write a note, slash the box and move along!
              Last edited by Harry S.; March 8, 2023, 05:15 AM.


              Comment

              • William B.
                Very Frequent User
                • April 30, 1975
                • 939

                #8
                Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

                Thanks everyone, calling Paragon tomorrow. my 66 judged in 2017 regional never received a deduct for u-joints, my 65 judged last year regional received the 1 point deduction, both have stepped u-joints.
                Restoring a 67 now and want to be more correct.

                Comment

                • Joseph S.
                  National Judging Chairman
                  • February 28, 1985
                  • 847

                  #9
                  Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

                  Originally posted by Tony Stein (4600)
                  1 point Joe. Some features have greater weight than others. It is not just 52 divided by whatever. You have to weigh the importance of the components. U-Joints aren't just "hardware". There are 16 caps and make up a pretty major part of the line item.

                  Let me make my point by this example: how many components in a 5-point lower A-arm? You have the large steel A-arm itself, the cross shaft, the two bushings, the ball joint, the cotter pin, the nut and washer on top of the ball joint, the zerk, the two rivets, the rubber bumper, the two bolts that attach the bumper to the A-arm. Did I miss anything? That's about 12 items. So each of these represents 1 of 12. The ball joint rivets should be natural, right? If the two rivets are painted black, that is only a minor finish deviation but too small to deduct for a 1-point finish deduction on a 5-point item. Right? Change the example: let's say that everything is typical factory, but the steel A-arm itself is unpainted (should be gloss black). The steel A-arm itself is still only 1/12 of the line item by your analysis. But if the steel A-arm itself is unpainted, then the proper deduction is 1 for finish because that one item is the major component even though it is 1/12 of the entire assembly by your math analysis.

                  The point is this: sometimes you have to weigh the components by importance. It isn't always just add up the components and divide. It often is, but not always.
                  Tony, I feel I need to correct your math. If you take a 20% Configuration for the U joints, by taking a 1 point deduction you are placing 5 points value on the UJoints alone and 0 points value on the rest of what is there. You need to assign a value to the Drive shaft & Yokes, a value to the 1/2 shafts and a value to the 52 Hardware items. The UJoints alone can not be valued at 5 points.

                  Comment

                  • Stewart L.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • February 29, 1980
                    • 351

                    #10
                    Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

                    Mike at Americas Finest is the manufacturer/importer and the other vendors source them from him.

                    Comment

                    • Joseph T.
                      Very Frequent User
                      • February 28, 1986
                      • 169

                      #11
                      Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

                      William
                      The 1967 Judging team has discussed the "U-joint flat cap" subject on numerous occasions and felt that it doesn't warrant a deduction with only 5 points assigned to both half shafts and drive shaft. We will make a note about them and move on. Good luck with your restoration

                      Comment

                      • Joseph S.
                        National Judging Chairman
                        • February 28, 1985
                        • 847

                        #12
                        Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

                        Originally posted by Stewart Lowe (3422)
                        Mike at Americas Finest is the manufacturer/importer and the other vendors source them from him.
                        Hmmm! I think I'll stay with a Spicer or MOOG part!

                        Comment

                        • Joseph S.
                          National Judging Chairman
                          • February 28, 1985
                          • 847

                          #13
                          Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

                          Originally posted by Tony Stein (4600)
                          1 point Joe. Some features have greater weight than others. It is not just 52 divided by whatever. You have to weigh the importance of the components. U-Joints aren't just "hardware". There are 16 caps and make up a pretty major part of the line item.

                          Let me make my point by this example: how many components in a 5-point lower A-arm? You have the large steel A-arm itself, the cross shaft, the two bushings, the ball joint, the cotter pin, the nut and washer on top of the ball joint, the zerk, the two rivets, the rubber bumper, the two bolts that attach the bumper to the A-arm. Did I miss anything? That's about 12 items. So each of these represents 1 of 12. The ball joint rivets should be natural, right? If the two rivets are painted black, that is only a minor finish deviation but too small to deduct for a 1-point finish deduction on a 5-point item. Right? Change the example: let's say that everything is typical factory, but the steel A-arm itself is unpainted (should be gloss black). The steel A-arm itself is still only 1/12 of the line item by your analysis. But if the steel A-arm itself is unpainted, then the proper deduction is 1 for finish because that one item is the major component even though it is 1/12 of the entire assembly by your math analysis.

                          The point is this: sometimes you have to weigh the components by importance. It isn't always just add up the components and divide. It often is, but not always.
                          Tony, We shouldn't be breaking an A Arm into components. The rule is that a component should be assessed as it is retrieved from the parts shelf. Since the A Arm is assembled and painted as a unit the entire A Arm should have a value of 2.5 points each side. This has been and will again be discussed during the CDCIF class at the Judges Training Retreat.

                          Comment

                          • Tim L.
                            Infrequent User
                            • September 4, 2013
                            • 11

                            #14
                            Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

                            I bought all the flat cap u joints that Paragon had about 6 months ago. I have 4 that I will sell if you can't find them, PM me.

                            Comment

                            • Tony S.
                              NCRS Vice President, Director Region VII & 10
                              • April 30, 1981
                              • 975

                              #15
                              Re: Source for flat capped u-joints

                              Joe: I suspect I will be participating as an instructor there in some capacity per our mutual friend.
                              Region VII Director (serving members in Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas).
                              Original member of the Kansas City Chapter, est'd 07/11/1982.
                              Member: 1965 and 1966 National Judging Teams
                              Judging Chairman--Kansas City Chapter.
                              Co-Editor of the 1965 TIM and JG, 6th and 7th editions.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"