I've decided on 205/75-15 tires for my 1962. I don't need to revisit that decision. So, seeing that I'm stuck with a low performance tire, which one to buy?
The best 205/75 seems to be the Michelin. This week, Sears has the Michelin "Weatherwise" on sale. They advertise it as, "Made alongside the famous Michelin RainForce MX4." My natural inclination is to buy the best. But why? The claim to fame for this tire seems to be its ability in the rain and its long wear. Neither of which my 1962 will much see.
So, why don't I buy the cheapest, seeing that it's low performance anyway? I don't care about tread life. The things will rot before the tread wears out. I don't care about its ability in rain, snow, and mud. And I know it's not a performance tire. So, why not buy the $25 apiece ones? Both the Michelins and the cheapest are "S" speed rated, which is about the best you can get in this size.
I'd probably spend over $200/tire if I could get a high performance "H" or higher rated. I'm sitting on the fence, and looking for some definitive reason to go one way or the other.
The best 205/75 seems to be the Michelin. This week, Sears has the Michelin "Weatherwise" on sale. They advertise it as, "Made alongside the famous Michelin RainForce MX4." My natural inclination is to buy the best. But why? The claim to fame for this tire seems to be its ability in the rain and its long wear. Neither of which my 1962 will much see.
So, why don't I buy the cheapest, seeing that it's low performance anyway? I don't care about tread life. The things will rot before the tread wears out. I don't care about its ability in rain, snow, and mud. And I know it's not a performance tire. So, why not buy the $25 apiece ones? Both the Michelins and the cheapest are "S" speed rated, which is about the best you can get in this size.
I'd probably spend over $200/tire if I could get a high performance "H" or higher rated. I'm sitting on the fence, and looking for some definitive reason to go one way or the other.
Comment